With Chinese-owned factories torched and workers hunkered down under martial law, Beijing is being pulled into the ulcerous crisis in Myanmar, an unraveling country it had carefully stitched into its big plans for Asia.
During a visit to Myanmar in January last year, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) elevated the Southeast Asian neighbor to “country of shared destiny” status, Beijing’s highest diplomatic stripe.
The aim was to nudge Myanmar decisively toward China — and away from the US — and drive through billions of dollars of projects under the Belt and Road Initiative, including an oil and gas pipeline, and an Indian Ocean port.
Photo: AP
Fast-forward one year, and the strategically located country has tipped into bloody chaos after the Burmese military, or Tatmadaw, in a coup took out the civilian government of Burmese State Counselor Aung San Suu Kyi.
The democracy movement which has since unfurled accuses China of waving through the generals’ power grab and trading Myanmar’s freedom for its own strategic gain. As Burmese security forces kill protesters — nearly 150 so far — Beijing faces a dilemma: back the men with guns or side with an increasingly anti-China public.
“China doesn’t really care who is in government, but it wants a government that will protect Chinese projects and interests,” said Richard Horsey, an expert on Burmese politics. “This is a military that Beijing doesn’t think can bring stability ... and the more China tries to build a relationship with that regime, the more the public will be put offside.”
That is laden with danger for Chinese interests.
At least 32 Chinese-owned textile factories on Sunday were burned down in several townships of Myanmar’s biggest city of Yangon, causing about US$37 million of damage, Chinese state media reported.
A Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman demanded the immediate protection of “Chinese institutions and personnel.”
On Tuesday, Chinese businesses were closed in the flashpoint areas, leaving workers holed up in a “hostile environment” cloaked by martial law, a representative of a garment factory in Yangon’s Shwepyitar Township said.
“All Chinese staff are staying inside the factory [and] some police have also been stationed there,” the spokesperson said, requesting anonymity.
Ominous commentaries have since seeped out of Chinese media, with one saying that Beijing could be prodded “into taking more drastic action ... if the authorities cannot deliver and the chaos continues.”
Twitter accounts of Myanmar democracy groups allege — without offering clear proof — that the military carried out the factory attacks to justify a crackdown in which dozens of protesters died.
Ripples of anti-China sentiment in Myanmar could become waves across a Southeast Asian region suspicious of China’s reach, influence and penchant for debt-trap diplomacy to get its projects over the line.
“Any broad-based popular uprising against Chinese interests can be contagious and percolate anti-China grievances through Cambodia, Laos and elsewhere,” said Thitinan Pongsudhirak, a political science professor at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok.
“China had figured out this piece [Myanmar] of its geostrategic puzzle,” but now there is “no easy play ahead,” he said.
In Myanmar, public anger at Chinese projects has ended major investments before.
Construction of a US$3.6 billion Myitsone Dam in northern Kachin State was spiked a decade ago after widespread opposition, while the voracious Chinese market for rare wood, jade and rubies is routinely blamed by the public for driving the resource grab inside Myanmar.
However, alongside economic interests, China also craves the legitimacy of global leadership and “can’t turn a blind eye to a dark dictatorship” on its doorstep, Thitinan said.
Beijing enjoys exceptional leverage over Myanmar, but it has so far refused to label the military action a coup.
China is the country’s leading foreign investor and supplies the military with hardware.
Observers say that it also maintains alliances with ethnic militias on the long Myanmar-China border, who have been fighting the army for decades.
China has denied any advance knowledge of the Feb. 1 coup, and its official position so far has been to call for de-escalation, while supporting “all sides” in Myanmar’s post-coup crisis.
On Thursday last week, it signed a UN Security Council statement strongly condemning violence against protesters — a rare act by Beijing, which has previously shielded Myanmar at the UN over alleged genocide against the Rohingya minority.
Still, China remains a potential referee, said Soe Myint Aung, a political analyst from the Yangon Center for Independent Research.
“China can play a direct or indirect mediating role for a negotiated compromise,” he said.
First, it would have to chip back at the anger and suspicion in Myanmar.
Anti-Beijing placards are common at protests, and there are rumors of Chinese military flights, while the Internet grumbles with memes urging a boycott of everything Chinese, from video games to Huawei smartphones and TikTok.
“China babysits the Tatmadaw. It is the backbone of disruption in our country,” one democracy supporter said in Yangon, requesting anonymity. “China has dug up our jade and jewels, taken our oil, and now it wants to cut our country in half with its pipeline.”
DIPLOMATIC THAW: The Canadian prime minister’s China visit and improved Beijing-Ottawa ties raised lawyer Zhang Dongshuo’s hopes for a positive outcome in the retrial China has overturned the death sentence of Canadian Robert Schellenberg, a Canadian official said on Friday, in a possible sign of a diplomatic thaw as Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney seeks to boost trade ties with Beijing. Schellenberg’s lawyer, Zhang Dongshuo (張東碩), yesterday confirmed China’s Supreme People’s Court struck down the sentence. Schellenberg was detained on drug charges in 2014 before China-Canada ties nosedived following the 2018 arrest in Vancouver of Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou (孟晚舟). That arrest infuriated Beijing, which detained two Canadians — Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig — on espionage charges that Ottawa condemned as retaliatory. In January
Two medieval fortresses face each other across the Narva River separating Estonia from Russia on Europe’s eastern edge. Once a symbol of cooperation, the “Friendship Bridge” connecting the two snow-covered banks has been reinforced with rows of razor wire and “dragon’s teeth” anti-tank obstacles on the Estonian side. “The name is kind of ironic,” regional border chief Eerik Purgel said. Some fear the border town of more than 50,0000 people — a mixture of Estonians, Russians and people left stateless after the fall of the Soviet Union — could be Russian President Vladimir Putin’s next target. On the Estonian side of the bridge,
Jeremiah Kithinji had never touched a computer before he finished high school. A decade later, he is teaching robotics, and even took a team of rural Kenyans to the World Robotics Olympiad in Singapore. In a classroom in Laikipia County — a sparsely populated grasslands region of northern Kenya known for its rhinos and cheetahs — pupils are busy snapping together wheels, motors and sensors to assemble a robot. Guiding them is Kithinji, 27, who runs a string of robotics clubs in the area that have taken some of his pupils far beyond the rural landscapes outside. In November, he took a team
SHOW OF SUPPORT: The move showed that aggression toward Greenland is a question for Europe and Canada, and the consequences are global, not just Danish, experts said Canada and France, which adamantly oppose US President Donald Trump’s wish to control Greenland, were to open consulates in the Danish autonomous territory’s capital yesterday, in a strong show of support for the local government. Since returning to the White House last year, Trump has repeatedly insisted that Washington needs to control the strategic, mineral-rich Arctic island for security reasons. Trump last month backed off his threats to seize Greenland after saying he had struck a “framework” deal with NATO chief Mark Rutte to ensure greater US influence. A US-Denmark-Greenland working group has been established to discuss ways to meet Washington’s security concerns