Democrats in the US House of Representatives are laying the groundwork for the next phase of their impeachment inquiry with a vote this week on a resolution to affirm the investigation, set rules for public hearings and outline the potential process for writing articles of impeachment against US President Donald Trump.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Monday announced a vote on the resolution, which would be the first formal House vote on the impeachment inquiry.
It aims to nullify complaints from Trump and his allies — amplified last week when Republicans stormed a secure room used for impeachment interviews — that the process is illegitimate, unfair and lacking in due process.
Despite the move toward a vote, Democrats said that they were not yielding to Republican pressure.
Pelosi dismissed Republican arguments against the inquiry, including that impeachment cannot begin without formal approval from the House.
“I do not care. I do not care. This is a false thing with them,” Pelosi told reporters in the Capitol. “Understand it has nothing to do with them. It has to do with how we proceed.”
Trump has cited the lack of a House vote as a reason to refuse cooperation with the impeachment investigation.
In the wake of Pelosi’s announcement, the White House said that nothing had changed.
Pelosi “is finally admitting what the rest of America already knew — that Democrats were conducting an unauthorized impeachment proceeding, refusing to give the president due process and their secret, shady, closed-door depositions are completely and irreversibly illegitimate,” White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said.
Pelosi did not release the text of the resolution, but said that it would establish procedure for public hearings, authorize the disclosure of closed-door deposition transcripts and set forth “due process rights for the president and his counsel.”
It was unclear if that means that White House lawyers would be able to interview witnesses, or if Republicans would be able to call their own.
Republicans have said that the minority had those powers in previous impeachment investigations.
Many government officials have cooperated with the inquiry, despite Trump’s orders.
However, Pelosi’s announcement came just hours after a former White House national security official defied a House subpoena for closed-door testimony, escalating the standoff between the US Congress and the White House over who will testify.
Earlier on Monday, Charles Kupperman, who was a deputy to former US national security adviser John Bolton, failed to show up for the scheduled closed-door deposition after filing a lawsuit asking a federal court in Washington to rule on whether he was legally required to appear.
In a statement, Kupperman said that he was awaiting “judicial clarity.”
US House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said that Kupperman’s suit has “no basis in law” and speculated that the White House did not want him to testify, because his testimony could be incriminating.
Democrats are investigating Trump’s pressure on the Ukrainian government to pursue politically motivated investigations, as the administration was also withholding military aid to the country.
“If this witness had something to say that would be helpful to the White House, they would’ve wanted him to come and testify,” Schiff told reporters. “They plainly don’t.”
The three committees leading the impeachment inquiry would move forward, with or without testimony from Kupperman and other witnesses, Schiff said.
Democrats have indicated that they are likely to use no-show witnesses to write an article of impeachment against Trump for obstruction of justice, rather than launching potentially lengthy court battles to obtain testimony.
“We are not willing to allow the White House to engage us in a lengthy game of rope-a-dope in the courts, so we will move forward,” Schiff said.
Schiff said over the weekend that he wants Bolton to testify, although that has not yet been scheduled.
He on Sunday told This Week that Bolton, who, according to other witnesses had concerns about the Ukraine policy, “has very relevant information.”
However, he predicted that the White House would fight a Bolton appearance.
In turning their focus to the White House, lawmakers have said that they are hoping to get more answers about what aides close to Trump knew about his orders on Ukraine policy.
OPTIMISTIC: A Philippine Air Force spokeswoman said the military believed the crew were safe and were hopeful that they and the jet would be recovered A Philippine Air Force FA-50 jet and its two-person crew are missing after flying in support of ground forces fighting communist rebels in the southern Mindanao region, a military official said yesterday. Philippine Air Force spokeswoman Colonel Consuelo Castillo said the jet was flying “over land” on the way to its target area when it went missing during a “tactical night operation in support of our ground troops.” While she declined to provide mission specifics, Philippine Army spokesman Colonel Louie Dema-ala confirmed that the missing FA-50 was part of a squadron sent “to provide air support” to troops fighting communist rebels in
PROBE: Last week, Romanian prosecutors launched a criminal investigation against presidential candidate Calin Georgescu accusing him of supporting fascist groups Tens of thousands of protesters gathered in Romania’s capital on Saturday in the latest anti-government demonstration by far-right groups after a top court canceled a presidential election in the EU country last year. Protesters converged in front of the government building in Bucharest, waving Romania’s tricolor flags and chanting slogans such as “down with the government” and “thieves.” Many expressed support for Calin Georgescu, who emerged as the frontrunner in December’s canceled election, and demanded they be resumed from the second round. George Simion, the leader of the far-right Alliance for the Unity of Romanians (AUR), which organized the protest,
ECONOMIC DISTORTION? The US commerce secretary’s remarks echoed Elon Musk’s arguments that spending by the government does not create value for the economy US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick on Sunday said that government spending could be separated from GDP reports, in response to questions about whether the spending cuts pushed by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency could possibly cause an economic downturn. “You know that governments historically have messed with GDP,” Lutnick said on Fox News Channel’s Sunday Morning Futures. “They count government spending as part of GDP. So I’m going to separate those two and make it transparent.” Doing so could potentially complicate or distort a fundamental measure of the US economy’s health. Government spending is traditionally included in the GDP because
Hundreds of people in rainbow colors gathered on Saturday in South Africa’s tourist magnet Cape Town to honor the world’s first openly gay imam, who was killed last month. Muhsin Hendricks, who ran a mosque for marginalized Muslims, was shot dead last month near the southern city of Gqeberha. “I was heartbroken. I think it’s sad especially how far we’ve come, considering how progressive South Africa has been,” attendee Keisha Jensen said. Led by motorcycle riders, the mostly young crowd walked through the streets of the coastal city, some waving placards emblazoned with Hendricks’s image and reading: “#JUSTICEFORMUHSIN.” No arrest
RSS