Even in its prime, the house at 24 Beizongbu Hutong was no architectural jewel, just one of countless brick-and-timber courtyard homes that clogged the labyrinthine heart of this ancient imperial capital.
However, for seven years in the 1930s, it sheltered one of modern China’s most fabled couples, Liang Sicheng (梁思成) and Lin Huiyin (林徽因), Ivy League-educated architects who had returned home to champion the notion that a great nation should hold dear its historic patrimony. It was Liang, the debonair son from an illustrious family of intellectuals, who urged the victorious Chinese Communist Party to preserve Beijing’s Yuan dynasty grid and its hulking city walls. Mao Zedong (毛澤東), the country’s unsentimental leader, thought otherwise.
So when architectural preservationists awoke last weekend to find that the couple’s house had been reduced to rubble, there was a predictable wave of outrage, but also a sense of helplessness that an official “immovable cultural relic” could be so easily dispatched by a government-affiliated real-estate company.
The cultural bureaucrats who oversee the preservation of historic sites in the Dongcheng district neighborhood were not particularly moved by the building’s demise, which took place furtively during the Lunar New Year holiday, a time when much of the country shuts down.
“A replica will be built,” one official unapologetically told the state news media.
In a city that has watched its centuries-old, low-rise fabric steadily be supplanted by soulless glass towers or, in some cases, pastiche recreations of the past, the destruction of 24 Beizongbu Hutong was a cruel irony given the passions of its former occupants. In a flurry of articles and editorials last week, the national news media denounced the demolition as a wanton violation of the country’s laws and an affront to Chinese history.
Even the normally stolid state news service, Xinhua, was sharp in its criticism.
“House Demolished, Culture Wounded” was the main headline on its home page on Thursday.
In one of several articles and editorials, Xinhua attacked the municipal government’s complacency.
“A cultural relic is destroyed and a new phrase is born,” said one commentary, a sarcastic reference to the city official who had described the destruction as “renovation through demolition.”
The editorial noted that of 533,000 landmarks documented by the National Bureau of Cultural Relics last year, 44,000 had already disappeared.
“Behind such cold figures, hundreds and thousands of pages of historical information have vanished alongside these buildings,” it said.
Even if distraught by the loss of a house he had tried so hard to save, He Shuzhong (何戍中), one of the city’s best-known preservation advocates, said he had found some solace in the unusually vociferous public uproar. The outrage, he said, was tied not only to the realization that Beijing had lost too much of its past, but also to a sense that the city’s frenetic pursuit of modernization and material excess had left many citizens feeling adrift.
“Liang Sicheng and Lin Huiyin, after all, promoted the ideal that intellectuals and experts should commit themselves to improving society and the nation,” said He, whose nonprofit group, the Beijing Cultural Heritage Protection Center, successfully fought to have the house designated a historic landmark in 2009. “I think people find that modern China lacks that sense of devotion, which is why the loss of this building means so much.”
The lives of Liang and Lin, typified, in some ways, the experience of many Western-educated Chinese who were determined to help build the new China — but were often rewarded with great hardship.
After studying at the University of Pennsylvania, they returned in 1928 and carried out the first exhaustive study of China’s architectural history, scrambling across the tiled roofs of millennium-old temples to decipher long-lost building practices.
They established an architecture school in the northeastern city of Shenyang and turned their Beijing home into a salon for the city’s leading philosophers, poets and artists. Liang represented China on the team that designed the UN headquarters in New York.
After Mao asked him to come up with a new urban plan for Beijing in 1949, Liang, inspired by the painstaking preservation of -European capitals, proposed building a new urban development adjacent to the walled metropolis and turning its towering ramparts into a linear park. Mao rejected the idea, deciding that the imperial city and its brooding walls were unwanted symbols of China’s feudal past. The night before the demolition began, Liang sat atop the wall and wept.
In the years that followed, Liang went on to foster a new national style of architecture that married Chinese and Western motifs. His most recognizable contribution to the city may be the Monument to the People’s Heroes, the sobering stone obelisk that anchors the center of Tiananmen Square.
Like many intellectuals, his fortunes faded during the upheavals of the 1950s, and more profoundly during Mao’s decade-long Cultural Revolution. Hounded for his Western education and affinity for Chinese antiquities, he was attacked as a counterrevolutionary and died in 1972. (Lin succumbed to tuberculosis in 1955. Her great-niece, the US architect Maya Lin, designed the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington.)
It took another three decades before city officials would come to appreciate — at least on paper — the ideals espoused by the man known as the father of modern Chinese architecture. It was in 2005, after nearly half the city’s 3,000 narrow alleys, or hutong, had been erased, that the municipal government issued a plan to preserve what remained of the historic core.
However, that plan has sometimes felt like a taunt, especially during the preparations for the 2008 Summer Olympics, when -government-backed developers took huge bites out of the protected quarter.
“They issued a grand plan, but the demolitions never paused,” said Hua Xinmin (華新民), a preservation advocate whose father succeeded Liang as the city’s planning chief.
It is tempting to imagine the demise of 24 Beizongbu Hutong as Beijing’s Pennsylvania Station moment, when outrage over the demolition of the iconic rail terminus in New York City catalyzed the preservation movement in the US.
However, judging by the pessimism of the architecture students, history buffs and ordinary Beijing residents who made a pilgrimage to the rubble-strewn site last week, there is little reason to expect any change in the status quo.
The visitors, though, were nothing if not determined as they tried to maneuver around a scrum of young guards in their quest to photograph a skeletal wood entryway, the only remains of the house.
An old man silently watched the hubbub, but once prompted, he eagerly dispensed details about the house and the neighborhood in which he was born.
“This hutong used to be filled with famous people,” said the man, 76, a retired postal worker who gave only his surname, Ma.
He gestured behind him to a stretch of debris and then in front of him, to his home, also marked with the Chinese character for demolish. Not far away thrummed the Second Ring Road — the highway that replaced Liang’s beloved city wall.
“Everyone is gone,” Ma said with a wave of his hand. “When the government says it’s time to go, you go.”
Asian perspectives of the US have shifted from a country once perceived as a force of “moral legitimacy” to something akin to “a landlord seeking rent,” Singaporean Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen (黃永宏) said on the sidelines of an international security meeting. Ng said in a round-table discussion at the Munich Security Conference in Germany that assumptions undertaken in the years after the end of World War II have fundamentally changed. One example is that from the time of former US president John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address more than 60 years ago, the image of the US was of a country
BLIND COST CUTTING: A DOGE push to lay off 2,000 energy department workers resulted in hundreds of staff at a nuclear security agency being fired — then ‘unfired’ US President Donald Trump’s administration has halted the firings of hundreds of federal employees who were tasked with working on the nation’s nuclear weapons programs, in an about-face that has left workers confused and experts cautioning that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE’s) blind cost cutting would put communities at risk. Three US officials who spoke to The Associated Press said up to 350 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) were abruptly laid off late on Thursday, with some losing access to e-mail before they’d learned they were fired, only to try to enter their offices on Friday morning
Cook Islands officials yesterday said they had discussed seabed minerals research with China as the small Pacific island mulls deep-sea mining of its waters. The self-governing country of 17,000 people — a former colony of close partner New Zealand — has licensed three companies to explore the seabed for nodules rich in metals such as nickel and cobalt, which are used in electric vehicle (EV) batteries. Despite issuing the five-year exploration licenses in 2022, the Cook Islands government said it would not decide whether to harvest the potato-sized nodules until it has assessed environmental and other impacts. Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown
STEADFAST DART: The six-week exercise, which involves about 10,000 troops from nine nations, focuses on rapid deployment scenarios and multidomain operations NATO is testing its ability to rapidly deploy across eastern Europe — without direct US assistance — as Washington shifts its approach toward European defense and the war in Ukraine. The six-week Steadfast Dart 2025 exercises across Bulgaria, Romania and Greece are taking place as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine approaches the three-year mark. They involve about 10,000 troops from nine nations and represent the largest NATO operation planned this year. The US absence from the exercises comes as European nations scramble to build greater military self-sufficiency over their concerns about the commitment of US President Donald Trump’s administration to common defense and