The combined cost of British military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq over the past 12 months has almost doubled to more than ?3 billion (US$6 billion), a cross-party group of parliamentarians revealed on Monday.
The costs of operations by British forces in Afghanistan has risen to more than ?1.6 billion, a year-on-year increase of 122 percent. More surprisingly, given the reduction in troops in Iraq, the cost of Britain's military presence there has also increased to ?1.6 billion, a year-on-year rise of 72 percent, the House of Commons Defence Committee said.
The costs are about 50 percent more than the government forecast three months ago, the report said. It came as military officials made it clear that the number of British troops in Iraq would not now be cut this spring to the number previously indicated by British Prime Minster Gordon Brown.
The total cost of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan since the invasion of Iraq in 2003 now totals about ?10 billion, estimates based on annual official figures from the Treasury and the Ministry of Defence (MOD) showed. The sharpest increases were for buying, repairing and replacing new armored vehicles and other equipment acquired using a special Urgent Operation Requirements (UOR) system. The report said these costs in Iraq and Afghanistan had risen "far beyond the scale of other costs."
"The MOD needs to make clearer the reasons for these considerable increases," it said.
James Arbuthnot, the committee's chairman and a former Conservative defence minister, said: "Few people will object to the investment being made in better facilities and equipment for our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. However, this estimate represents a lot of public money. The MOD needs to provide better information about what it is all being spent on."
The figures were seized on by Liam Fox, the opposition Conservative Shadow Defence Minister, who said: "We have been complaining for a long time that these operations are under-resourced. It appears that this is something the government seems to belatedly recognize."
Kate Hudson, the chair of the London-based Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, said: "The human costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are clear, with an estimated 655,000 dead in Iraq alone, but the opportunities lost by spending these billions on further destruction rather than on humanitarian reconstruction adds to the long list of tragedies unleashed by Bush's wars."
Bob Ainsworth, the armed forces minister, said: "I am quite clear what we are spending it on and because this money comes from the Treasury reserve, spending it in one theater does not come at the expense of the other. We are spending it on better equipment ... and paying our forces more, including a tax-free operational bonus -- in both Iraq and Afghanistan."
The committee observed that the cost of operations in Iraq was as high as in Afghanistan. This was despite the reduction in British troops in Basra. But the MOD has been forced to invest in equipment for troops as attacks by insurgents increase.
In a statement on Monday, the MOD avoided any reference to Brown's October announcement that he planned to reduce the number of UK troops in Basra to 2,500 from the spring of this year. The MOD said only that it intended "to reduce troop numbers in Iraq over the coming months."
A senior MOD official said Iraqi generals in Basra wanted a significant British presence as they built up their forces.
"Where are we going to be at the end of 2008? We don't know," the official said.
POLITICAL PRISONERS VS DEPORTEES: Venezuela’s prosecutor’s office slammed the call by El Salvador’s leader, accusing him of crimes against humanity Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele on Sunday proposed carrying out a prisoner swap with Venezuela, suggesting he would exchange Venezuelan deportees from the US his government has kept imprisoned for what he called “political prisoners” in Venezuela. In a post on X, directed at Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, Bukele listed off a number of family members of high-level opposition figures in Venezuela, journalists and activists detained during the South American government’s electoral crackdown last year. “The only reason they are imprisoned is for having opposed you and your electoral fraud,” he wrote to Maduro. “However, I want to propose a humanitarian agreement that
ECONOMIC WORRIES: The ruling PAP faces voters amid concerns that the city-state faces the possibility of a recession and job losses amid Washington’s tariffs Singapore yesterday finalized contestants for its general election on Saturday next week, with the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) fielding 32 new candidates in the biggest refresh of the party that has ruled the city-state since independence in 1965. The move follows a pledge by Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財), who took office last year and assumed the PAP leadership, to “bring in new blood, new ideas and new energy” to steer the country of 6 million people. His latest shake-up beats that of predecessors Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) and Goh Chok Tong (吳作棟), who replaced 24 and 11 politicians respectively
Young women standing idly around a park in Tokyo’s west suggest that a giant statue of Godzilla is not the only attraction for a record number of foreign tourists. Their faces lit by the cold glow of their phones, the women lining Okubo Park are evidence that sex tourism has developed as a dark flipside to the bustling Kabukicho nightlife district. Increasing numbers of foreign men are flocking to the area after seeing videos on social media. One of the women said that the area near Kabukicho, where Godzilla rumbles and belches smoke atop a cinema, has become a “real
‘WATER WARFARE’: A Pakistani official called India’s suspension of a 65-year-old treaty on the sharing of waters from the Indus River ‘a cowardly, illegal move’ Pakistan yesterday canceled visas for Indian nationals, closed its airspace for all Indian-owned or operated airlines, and suspended all trade with India, including to and from any third country. The retaliatory measures follow India’s decision to suspend visas for Pakistani nationals in the aftermath of a deadly attack by shooters in Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. The rare attack on civilians shocked and outraged India and prompted calls for action against their country’s archenemy, Pakistan. New Delhi did not publicly produce evidence connecting the attack to its neighbor, but said it had “cross-border” links to Pakistan. Pakistan denied any connection to