Google is to enter the political arena in earnest this week when it debates freedom of speech, intellectual property rights and how to connect Africa to the Internet at a special UN conference.
The Silicon Valley giant will attempt to position itself as a force for change that can finance Web entrepreneurs in the developing world, champion the rights of consumers against "over-zealous" copyright laws and use the Web to protect diverse minority cultures and languages.
But Google will declare itself unrepentant over the controversial decision to censor its search engine at the behest of Beijing. At the first Internet Governance Forum in Athens, which starts today, the firm will insist that its presence in China does more good than harm by getting more information to more people.
That claim was firmly rejected on Saturday night by Amnesty International, which is five months into its joint campaign with London's Observer newspaper (irrepressible.info), which calls for an end to online censorship and the persecution of bloggers.
The forum will be attended by delegations from more than 90 countries, including China, Cuba, Egypt, Iran, Syria, Tunisia and Vietnam, all of which have been criticized for curbing freedom of expression on the Web.
Amnesty will present a petition, signed by more than 47,000 people, demanding an end to such abuses, which in the worst cases have seen people jailed.
Google's motto, "Do no evil," has taken a battering in recent months. They will try to repair some of the damage during three "workshops."
Andrew McLaughlin, head of global public policy at Google, said the first event, "Building local access," would discuss getting Internet access to more people in developing nations.
At another session, "Access to knowledge and free expression," Google will warn how developing countries fear that Western intellectual property rights work to their disadvantage.
But Google is bound to be put under pressure over its foray into China.
"Google.cn is censored but we've come up with a technique for deciding what is to be censored that is basically technical, not editorial, and very reactive. That leads us to blocking from our site the minimum that the ISP [Internet service provider] level requires," McLaughlin said.
"I'm sure there are lots of people who will say it's just too distasteful, it's too gross, it's too political, you shouldn't do it. That's a totally legitimate point of view," he said.
"We've made an empirical judgment, though, that being able to hire Chinese employees and have them be part of the Google culture and be free-thinking, freewheeling Internet people ... when you add it all up, we think we're helping to advance the cause of change in China," he said.
Kate Allen, UK director of Amnesty International, does not accept Google's argument.
"One of the things we haven't seen from Google, Yahoo and Microsoft is any move by them to use their collective bargaining power to negotiate with and change the terms in which they operate in countries like China," she said.
"We do see Google with a search engine in China that gives very different results from the one for the rest for us," she said.
"I think the starkest example is the picture search for Tiananmen Square," Allen said.
We get the man in front of the tank; in China you get a happy, smiling couple, standing in Tiananmen Square as tourists," she said.
POLITICAL PRISONERS VS DEPORTEES: Venezuela’s prosecutor’s office slammed the call by El Salvador’s leader, accusing him of crimes against humanity Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele on Sunday proposed carrying out a prisoner swap with Venezuela, suggesting he would exchange Venezuelan deportees from the US his government has kept imprisoned for what he called “political prisoners” in Venezuela. In a post on X, directed at Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, Bukele listed off a number of family members of high-level opposition figures in Venezuela, journalists and activists detained during the South American government’s electoral crackdown last year. “The only reason they are imprisoned is for having opposed you and your electoral fraud,” he wrote to Maduro. “However, I want to propose a humanitarian agreement that
ECONOMIC WORRIES: The ruling PAP faces voters amid concerns that the city-state faces the possibility of a recession and job losses amid Washington’s tariffs Singapore yesterday finalized contestants for its general election on Saturday next week, with the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) fielding 32 new candidates in the biggest refresh of the party that has ruled the city-state since independence in 1965. The move follows a pledge by Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財), who took office last year and assumed the PAP leadership, to “bring in new blood, new ideas and new energy” to steer the country of 6 million people. His latest shake-up beats that of predecessors Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) and Goh Chok Tong (吳作棟), who replaced 24 and 11 politicians respectively
Young women standing idly around a park in Tokyo’s west suggest that a giant statue of Godzilla is not the only attraction for a record number of foreign tourists. Their faces lit by the cold glow of their phones, the women lining Okubo Park are evidence that sex tourism has developed as a dark flipside to the bustling Kabukicho nightlife district. Increasing numbers of foreign men are flocking to the area after seeing videos on social media. One of the women said that the area near Kabukicho, where Godzilla rumbles and belches smoke atop a cinema, has become a “real
‘WATER WARFARE’: A Pakistani official called India’s suspension of a 65-year-old treaty on the sharing of waters from the Indus River ‘a cowardly, illegal move’ Pakistan yesterday canceled visas for Indian nationals, closed its airspace for all Indian-owned or operated airlines, and suspended all trade with India, including to and from any third country. The retaliatory measures follow India’s decision to suspend visas for Pakistani nationals in the aftermath of a deadly attack by shooters in Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. The rare attack on civilians shocked and outraged India and prompted calls for action against their country’s archenemy, Pakistan. New Delhi did not publicly produce evidence connecting the attack to its neighbor, but said it had “cross-border” links to Pakistan. Pakistan denied any connection to
RSS