The sensitive issue of Islam, and strict Shariah law imposed by the ousted Taliban, has barely surfaced during two weeks of debate over Afghanistan's constitution that is reaching its closing stages.
But as the interim leader bids to win delegates over to his vision of a strong presidential system that will weaken opponents, observers are wondering what concessions his supporters have had to make, including in the area of religion.
Conservative Islamic leaders, many of them former mujahidin, holy warriors, who defeated the Soviets with US backing in the 1980s, have been busy jockeying for power at the expense of Washington's favorite, President Hamid Karzai.
"Rather than viewing the passage of the draft as a sign of Karzai's strength, you should look at the compromises that have to be made to the draft," said Vikram Parekh, analyst on Afghanistan for the International Crisis Group think tank.
A Western observer closely tracking the constitutional Loya Jirga, or Grand Assembly, in a giant white tent on the edge of Kabul, said Karzai's opponents could have won a greater say over the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court.
As a result, conservative clerics may win more control over the implementation of the law.
That, and the vague wording of religious articles in the draft constitution, mean the real tussle over the role of Islam in post-Taliban Afghanistan will come later.
"The draft is very general [on Islam] and leaves a lot of room for interpretation and that concerns us," said the Western observer.
The Supreme Court is run by conservative Islamists who this year arrested journalists for offending Islam and closed down their publication, called for the trial of members of the former communist regime and tried to ban cable television in Kabul.
Their view of Islam and Afghanistan's future is radically different from that of the moderate Karzai, widely tipped to win next year's presidential elections if he runs as expected.
"Clearly the concessions most worrisome for the West and for Afghan modernists would be those on the judiciary and the Islamic system," said Ahmed Rashid, a Pakistan-based Afghan expert.
"It matters because all the constitutional articles can be referred to the courts, and interpretation of these articles will depend on the judiciary. If you have a conservative judiciary you will have a conservative interpretation."
The Supreme Court has had little direct impact on the lives of ordinary Afghans so far, with political pressure helping to curb its more radical initiatives.
"The question will be `What happens when challenges are brought before the Supreme Court?'" said Parekh. "As the court becomes more functional, and if it becomes an institution that people appeal to, then we will see its impact.
"There is a fear of giving the court too much power of interpretation."
The draft constitution, expected to be finalized within days, states that "in Afghanistan, no law can be contrary to the sacred religion of Islam." It also speaks of a "progressive society," human rights and a "realization of democracy."
While many Afghans are concerned about lawlessness and violence since the fall of the Taliban, there seems little appetite in the deeply conservative Muslim country for a return to draconian Shariah imposed by the regime.
The Taliban carried out public amputations and executions, and the regime denied all females the right to education and most women the right to work.
POLITICAL PRISONERS VS DEPORTEES: Venezuela’s prosecutor’s office slammed the call by El Salvador’s leader, accusing him of crimes against humanity Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele on Sunday proposed carrying out a prisoner swap with Venezuela, suggesting he would exchange Venezuelan deportees from the US his government has kept imprisoned for what he called “political prisoners” in Venezuela. In a post on X, directed at Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, Bukele listed off a number of family members of high-level opposition figures in Venezuela, journalists and activists detained during the South American government’s electoral crackdown last year. “The only reason they are imprisoned is for having opposed you and your electoral fraud,” he wrote to Maduro. “However, I want to propose a humanitarian agreement that
ECONOMIC WORRIES: The ruling PAP faces voters amid concerns that the city-state faces the possibility of a recession and job losses amid Washington’s tariffs Singapore yesterday finalized contestants for its general election on Saturday next week, with the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) fielding 32 new candidates in the biggest refresh of the party that has ruled the city-state since independence in 1965. The move follows a pledge by Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財), who took office last year and assumed the PAP leadership, to “bring in new blood, new ideas and new energy” to steer the country of 6 million people. His latest shake-up beats that of predecessors Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) and Goh Chok Tong (吳作棟), who replaced 24 and 11 politicians respectively
Young women standing idly around a park in Tokyo’s west suggest that a giant statue of Godzilla is not the only attraction for a record number of foreign tourists. Their faces lit by the cold glow of their phones, the women lining Okubo Park are evidence that sex tourism has developed as a dark flipside to the bustling Kabukicho nightlife district. Increasing numbers of foreign men are flocking to the area after seeing videos on social media. One of the women said that the area near Kabukicho, where Godzilla rumbles and belches smoke atop a cinema, has become a “real
‘WATER WARFARE’: A Pakistani official called India’s suspension of a 65-year-old treaty on the sharing of waters from the Indus River ‘a cowardly, illegal move’ Pakistan yesterday canceled visas for Indian nationals, closed its airspace for all Indian-owned or operated airlines, and suspended all trade with India, including to and from any third country. The retaliatory measures follow India’s decision to suspend visas for Pakistani nationals in the aftermath of a deadly attack by shooters in Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. The rare attack on civilians shocked and outraged India and prompted calls for action against their country’s archenemy, Pakistan. New Delhi did not publicly produce evidence connecting the attack to its neighbor, but said it had “cross-border” links to Pakistan. Pakistan denied any connection to
RSS