More than 80 percent of Taiwanese opposed transferring Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) advanced technology to the US, a survey conducted by the Foundation for the People showed yesterday.
The foundation yesterday held a news conference to announce the results of its poll about the international situation, which was attended by the foundation’s chairman and Deputy Legislative Speaker Johnny Chiang (江啟臣).
The poll showed that 85.6 percent of Taiwanese believed US President Donald Trump’s administration could pressure Taiwan by imposing higher tariffs, while 52.8 percent of respondents said harsher US tariffs are “very likely” to happen and 10.7 percent said they are “unlikely” or “impossible.”
Photo: Lo Pei-de, Taipei Times
Asked whether current Taiwan-US trade is equal and fair, 40.6 percent of respondents said it is, and 49.0 percent said it is not. Additionally, 62.4 percent of respondents believed that the US has an advantage over Taiwan, while 24.8 percent saw it the other way around.
To lessen Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US, 59.5 percent of respondents said Taiwan should purchase arms and military systems, 41.6 percent picked fossil fuels and nuclear energy, 35.4 percent chose agricultural products, 12.5 percent went with cars and 11.5 percent picked computers and components, the results showed.
Up to 83.8 percent of respondents agreed that Taiwan’s semiconductor sector, led by TSMC, can be regarded as the “economic central mountain range” safeguarding the nation against Chinese military threats, while 8.8 percent disagreed.
As for whether Taiwan’s semiconductor industry serves as a “silicon shield” that would prompt military intervention from the US and other Western countries if China were to attack, 62.5 percent agreed and 30.8 percent disagreed.
Asked whether they agreed with Trump’s remark that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor businesses, 88.4 percent of respondents said they did not, while 9.5 percent said they did.
As for whether the Ministry of Economic Affairs should allow TSMC to transfer its advanced 2-nanometer process to the US if Trump makes more pressing demands, 84.8 percent said the ministry should not, while 10.9 percent said it should.
The poll also showed that 50 percent of respondents agreed that the governing Democratic Progressive Party had proactively negotiated with Washington to deal with Trump’s demands, while 42.6 percent disagreed.
As for the future of the US-China relationship, 13.4 percent of respondents said they believed it would get better, while 37.4 percent said the “status quo” would remain and 40 percent said it would worsen.
Chiang said that under Trump 2.0, talks would continue, with tariffs as a weapon.
Trump is testing countries to see what they would use as bargaining chips to trade with the US, he said.
In this “great negotiation era,” the government should establish its negotiation goals and strategies as soon as possible, Chiang said.
Taiwan should also develop other industries’ competitive edges instead of relying solely on TSMC, he said, adding that the semiconductor sector accounts for a huge portion of the nation’s GDP.
The survey was conducted by the foundation through the Internet, with respondents aged 20 or older nationwide. It collected 1,042 valid responses from Tuesday last week to Friday last week and has a margin of error of 3.03 percentage points.
The questionnaires were given to participants via Facebook advertisements, with raking ratio estimation used to ensure the sample is representative of the nation’s demographics in gender, age, region and educational background.
China might accelerate its strategic actions toward Taiwan, the South China Sea and across the first island chain, after the US officially entered a military conflict with Iran, as Beijing would perceive Washington as incapable of fighting a two-front war, a military expert said yesterday. The US’ ongoing conflict with Iran is not merely an act of retaliation or a “delaying tactic,” but a strategic military campaign aimed at dismantling Tehran’s nuclear capabilities and reshaping the regional order in the Middle East, said National Defense University distinguished adjunct lecturer Holmes Liao (廖宏祥), former McDonnell Douglas Aerospace representative in Taiwan. If
TO BE APPEALED: The environment ministry said coal reduction goals had to be reached within two months, which was against the principle of legitimate expectation The Taipei High Administrative Court on Thursday ruled in favor of the Taichung Environmental Protection Bureau in its administrative litigation against the Ministry of Environment for the rescission of a NT$18 million fine (US$609,570) imposed by the bureau on the Taichung Power Plant in 2019 for alleged excess coal power generation. The bureau in November 2019 revised what it said was a “slip of the pen” in the text of the operating permit granted to the plant — which is run by Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) — in October 2017. The permit originally read: “reduce coal use by 40 percent from Jan.
‘SPEY’ REACTION: Beijing said its Eastern Theater Command ‘organized troops to monitor and guard the entire process’ of a Taiwan Strait transit China sent 74 warplanes toward Taiwan between late Thursday and early yesterday, 61 of which crossed the median line in the Taiwan Strait. It was not clear why so many planes were scrambled, said the Ministry of National Defense, which tabulated the flights. The aircraft were sent in two separate tranches, the ministry said. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Thursday “confirmed and welcomed” a transit by the British Royal Navy’s HMS Spey, a River-class offshore patrol vessel, through the Taiwan Strait a day earlier. The ship’s transit “once again [reaffirmed the Strait’s] status as international waters,” the foreign ministry said. “Such transits by
Taiwan is doing everything it can to prevent a military conflict with China, including building up asymmetric defense capabilities and fortifying public resilience, Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) said in a recent interview. “Everything we are doing is to prevent a conflict from happening, whether it is 2027 or before that or beyond that,” Hsiao told American podcaster Shawn Ryan of the Shawn Ryan Show. She was referring to a timeline cited by several US military and intelligence officials, who said Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the Chinese People’s Liberation Army to be ready to take military action against Taiwan