The Constitutional Court yesterday heard arguments in a case involving the constitutionality of amendments to government oversight laws, with expert witnesses disagreeing on whether the legislative process was so flawed it should be declared void by the court.
The deliberation that led up to the passage of the amendments, which took effect on June 26, was fundamentally flawed because lawmakers approved the revisions by raising their hands and the names of the voters were not recorded, said expert witness Chang Wen-chen (張文貞), a law professor at National Taiwan University.
Chang cited a constitutional ruling in 2000, which said that such a voting method “contravened the principle of openness and transparency” and constituted “manifest and gross procedural flaws.”
Photo: CNA
In the 2000 ruling (Constitutional Interpretation No. 499), the court deemed the constitutional amendments adopted a year prior by the now-defunct National Assembly unconstitutional due in part to the use of secret ballots during the deliberation.
The oversight laws should be considered “quasi-constitutional statutes” as they “directly affected” the responsibilities of top government bodies stipulated in the Constitution, Chang said.
The case was brought to court by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus, the Executive Yuan, President William Lai (賴清德) and the Control Yuan in a bid to reject the oversight laws.
The amendments to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) and the Criminal Code were pushed through by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers at the end of May. The Constitutional Court issued an injunction that halted the enforcement of some revisions, including those that would give legislators much broader investigative powers.
Responding to Chang’s arguments, expert witness Ed Huang (黃銘輝), an associate professor at National Taipei University’s Department of Law, said the oversight laws did not apply the “vigorous” views adopted in the 2000 ruling and that the Constitutional Court should instead consider the 1994 ruling (Constitutional Interpretation No. 342) on the Organic Act of the National Security Council (國家安全會議組織法).
That ruling highlighted the court’s adherence to the “principle of legislative autonomy,” according to which the court should respect the legislature as an entity that operates under its own rules and procedures, Huang said.
The ruling also said the court should intervene only in the event of major flaws in the legislative process, defined as those that “can be determined ... without investigation into the facts,” Huang said.
Although the oversight laws were passed by lawmakers raising their hands in approval, they were legitimate according to the legislature’s rules of procedure, TPP caucus whip Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) said.
Neither electronic nor recorded voting is a “default rule” in the legislative process, he added.
However, attorney Chen Peng-kwang (陳鵬光), representing the DPP caucus, said that electronic and recorded voting had been adopted in the legislative process “by convention” for the past three decades.
The passage of the oversight amendments was an exception, because Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) contravened long-standing convention and disregarded the principle of openness and transparency, Chen said.
The oral arguments, which lasted until 5pm, also touched upon updated measures that expand the legislature’s investigative powers and require the president to periodically address the legislature and then take questions.
The case is being presided over by 15 justices, who were all appointed by former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of the DPP.
Under the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法), the approval of at least eight justices is required for any of the amendments to be annulled.
The court should rule on te case within three months of the conclusion of oral arguments, but the deadline can be extended by two months if necessary.
Taiwan would benefit from more integrated military strategies and deployments if the US and its allies treat the East China Sea, the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea as a “single theater of operations,” a Taiwanese military expert said yesterday. Shen Ming-shih (沈明室), a researcher at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, said he made the assessment after two Japanese military experts warned of emerging threats from China based on a drill conducted this month by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) Eastern Theater Command. Japan Institute for National Fundamentals researcher Maki Nakagawa said the drill differed from the
A fugitive in a suspected cosmetic surgery fraud case today returned to Taiwan from Canada, after being wanted for six years. Internet celebrity Su Chen-tuan (蘇陳端), known as Lady Nai Nai (貴婦奈奈), and her former boyfriend, plastic surgeon Paul Huang (黃博健), allegedly defrauded clients and friends of about NT$1 billion (US$30.66 million). Su was put on a wanted list in 2019 when she lived in Toronto, Canada, after failing to respond to subpoenas and arrest warrants from the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office. Su arrived at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport at 5am today on an EVA Air flight accompanied by a
A 79-year-old woman died today after being struck by a train at a level crossing in Taoyuan, police said. The woman, identified by her surname Wang (王), crossed the tracks even though the barriers were down in Jhongli District’s (中壢) Neili (內壢) area, the Taoyuan Branch of the Railway Police Bureau said. Surveillance footage showed that the railway barriers were lowered when Wang entered the crossing, but why she ventured onto the track remains under investigation, the police said. Police said they received a report of an incident at 6:41am involving local train No. 2133 that was heading from Keelung to Chiayi City. Investigators
The Keelung District Prosecutors’ Office today requested that a court detain three individuals, including Keelung Department of Civil Affairs Director Chang Yuan-hsiang (張淵翔), in connection with an investigation into forged signatures used in recall campaigns. Chang is suspected of accessing a household registration system to assist with recall campaigns targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) city councilors Cheng Wen-ting (鄭文婷) and Jiho Chang (張之豪), prosecutors said. Prosecutors yesterday directed investigators to search six locations, including the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Keelung office and the residences of several recall campaign leaders. The recall campaign leaders, including Chi Wen-chuan (紀文荃), Yu Cheng-i (游正義) and Hsu Shao-yeh