China’s new legal guidelines targeting advocates of Taiwanese independence, including allowing trials in absentia, are aimed at gaining jurisdiction, experts said on Monday.
The guidelines, issued on Friday last week with immediate effect, allow courts in China to try “Taiwan independence separatists” in absentia, with “diehard” advocates of independence convicted of inciting secession who also cause “grave harm to the state and the [Chinese] people” potentially being sentenced to death, Xinhua news agency reported.
Wu Se-chih (吳瑟致), director of Taiwan Thinktank’s China Research Center, said that if under China’s opaque judicial system a trial in absentia resulted in a guilty verdict, the defendant could be subject to an international arrest warrant.
Photo: CNA
Once such a warrant is issued, China would tell nations with which it has a mutual legal assistance treaty (MLAT) or other forms of legal agreements that the wanted person is a Chinese citizen, Wu said.
A trial in absentia would enforce Beijing’s “one China” principle regarding Taiwan, asserting that China has sovereignty over Taiwan and framing it as a domestic matter, Wu added.
That could pressure other nations, especially those with a MLAT or friendly diplomatic relations with China, to assist in related arrests or extraditions, he said, adding that this long-arm jurisdiction was aimed at asserting jurisdiction over Taiwan.
However, Wu said that many democratic nations provide assistance to individuals involved in political cases and would not extradite them to China.
That is especially true, given China’s weakened global influence, which makes it harder for Beijing to use economic incentives or pressure to compel other nations to cooperate as it has done in the past, he said.
Thirty-nine nations have extradition treaties with China, including popular travel destinations for Taiwanese, such as South Korea, Vietnam and Thailand, according to Chinese Ministry of Justice data.
There are also 55 nations that have signed treaties with China on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, including the US, Japan and Australia, which mostly involves collecting and exchanging information.
The timing of China’s move was also significant, said Arthur Wang (王智盛), secretary-general of the Asia-Pacific Elite Interchange Association and an expert on cross-strait relations.
He said the new guidelines were issued on Friday last week because the date was about one month after President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20.
“After a month of observation, they [Chinese officials] found they could not restrain Lai’s responses [to cross-strait relations],” Wang said. “Therefore, I believe this was a preset legal tool in their toolbox for sanctions against Taiwan.”
In his inaugural address on May 20, Lai called on Beijing to acknowledge Taiwan’s government and reiterated his stance that the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China are not subordinate to each other.
Despite criticism from Beijing that the statement “was an assertion of Taiwanese independence,” Lai on May 30 said that what he had said was the truth and he did not intend to provoke.
When asked why Chinese authorities were taking a legal approach, Wang said that China has shifted its strategy from infiltration and cognitive warfare against Taiwan to a new type of legal warfare.
This new strategy uses legal discourse to assert China’s sovereignty and jurisdiction over Taiwan, supported by its influence in international law, he said.
“Chinese military aircraft circling Taiwan and crossing the median line have become tactics that everyone has seen through,” Wang said. “However, this new type of legal warfare might create new fears and pressures for the Taiwanese people.”
He said that China has struggled to find a strategy to counter the internationalization of the Taiwan issue, leading to its authorities seeking a fundamental solution through legal means.
“By defining Taiwan independence and establishing long-arm jurisdiction and trials in absentia, China aims to curb the further internationalization of the Taiwan issue and prevent any subsequent adverse impact on its Taiwan policy,” Wang said.
Three Taiwanese airlines have prohibited passengers from packing Bluetooth earbuds and their charger cases in checked luggage. EVA Air and Uni Air said that Bluetooth earbuds and charger cases are categorized as portable electronic devices, which should be switched off if they are placed in checked luggage based on international aviation safety regulations. They must not be in standby or sleep mode. However, as charging would continue when earbuds are placed in the charger cases, which would contravene international aviation regulations, their cases must be carried as hand luggage, they said. Tigerair Taiwan said that earbud charger cases are equipped
Foreign travelers entering Taiwan on a short layover via Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport are receiving NT$600 gift vouchers from yesterday, the Tourism Administration said, adding that it hopes the incentive would boost tourism consumption at the airport. The program, which allows travelers holding non-Taiwan passports who enter the country during a layover of up to 24 hours to claim a voucher, aims to promote attractions at the airport, the agency said in a statement on Friday. To participate, travelers must sign up on the campaign Web site, the agency said. They can then present their passport and boarding pass for their connecting international
WEATHER Typhoon forming: CWA A tropical depression is expected to form into a typhoon as early as today, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said yesterday, adding that the storm’s path remains uncertain. Before the weekend, it would move toward the Philippines, the agency said. Some time around Monday next week, it might reach a turning point, either veering north toward waters east of Taiwan or continuing westward across the Philippines, the CWA said. Meanwhile, the eye of Typhoon Kalmaegi was 1,310km south-southeast of Oluanpi (鵝鑾鼻), Taiwan’s southernmost point, as of 2am yesterday, it said. The storm is forecast to move through central
The age requirement for commercial pilots and airline transport pilots is to be lowered by two years, to 18 and 21 years respectively, to expand the pool of pilots in accordance with international standards, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications announced today. The changes are part of amendments to articles 93, 119 and 121 of the Regulations Governing Licenses and Ratings for Airmen (航空人員檢定給證管理規則). The amendments take into account age requirements for aviation personnel certification in the Convention on International Civil Aviation and EU’s aviation safety regulations, as well as the practical needs of managing aviation personnel licensing, the ministry said. The ministry