China’s new legal guidelines targeting advocates of Taiwanese independence, including allowing trials in absentia, are aimed at gaining jurisdiction, experts said on Monday.
The guidelines, issued on Friday last week with immediate effect, allow courts in China to try “Taiwan independence separatists” in absentia, with “diehard” advocates of independence convicted of inciting secession who also cause “grave harm to the state and the [Chinese] people” potentially being sentenced to death, Xinhua news agency reported.
Wu Se-chih (吳瑟致), director of Taiwan Thinktank’s China Research Center, said that if under China’s opaque judicial system a trial in absentia resulted in a guilty verdict, the defendant could be subject to an international arrest warrant.
Photo: CNA
Once such a warrant is issued, China would tell nations with which it has a mutual legal assistance treaty (MLAT) or other forms of legal agreements that the wanted person is a Chinese citizen, Wu said.
A trial in absentia would enforce Beijing’s “one China” principle regarding Taiwan, asserting that China has sovereignty over Taiwan and framing it as a domestic matter, Wu added.
That could pressure other nations, especially those with a MLAT or friendly diplomatic relations with China, to assist in related arrests or extraditions, he said, adding that this long-arm jurisdiction was aimed at asserting jurisdiction over Taiwan.
However, Wu said that many democratic nations provide assistance to individuals involved in political cases and would not extradite them to China.
That is especially true, given China’s weakened global influence, which makes it harder for Beijing to use economic incentives or pressure to compel other nations to cooperate as it has done in the past, he said.
Thirty-nine nations have extradition treaties with China, including popular travel destinations for Taiwanese, such as South Korea, Vietnam and Thailand, according to Chinese Ministry of Justice data.
There are also 55 nations that have signed treaties with China on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, including the US, Japan and Australia, which mostly involves collecting and exchanging information.
The timing of China’s move was also significant, said Arthur Wang (王智盛), secretary-general of the Asia-Pacific Elite Interchange Association and an expert on cross-strait relations.
He said the new guidelines were issued on Friday last week because the date was about one month after President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20.
“After a month of observation, they [Chinese officials] found they could not restrain Lai’s responses [to cross-strait relations],” Wang said. “Therefore, I believe this was a preset legal tool in their toolbox for sanctions against Taiwan.”
In his inaugural address on May 20, Lai called on Beijing to acknowledge Taiwan’s government and reiterated his stance that the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China are not subordinate to each other.
Despite criticism from Beijing that the statement “was an assertion of Taiwanese independence,” Lai on May 30 said that what he had said was the truth and he did not intend to provoke.
When asked why Chinese authorities were taking a legal approach, Wang said that China has shifted its strategy from infiltration and cognitive warfare against Taiwan to a new type of legal warfare.
This new strategy uses legal discourse to assert China’s sovereignty and jurisdiction over Taiwan, supported by its influence in international law, he said.
“Chinese military aircraft circling Taiwan and crossing the median line have become tactics that everyone has seen through,” Wang said. “However, this new type of legal warfare might create new fears and pressures for the Taiwanese people.”
He said that China has struggled to find a strategy to counter the internationalization of the Taiwan issue, leading to its authorities seeking a fundamental solution through legal means.
“By defining Taiwan independence and establishing long-arm jurisdiction and trials in absentia, China aims to curb the further internationalization of the Taiwan issue and prevent any subsequent adverse impact on its Taiwan policy,” Wang said.
The military has spotted two Chinese warships operating in waters near Penghu County in the Taiwan Strait and sent its own naval and air forces to monitor the vessels, the Ministry of National Defense (MND) said. Beijing sends warships and warplanes into the waters and skies around Taiwan on an almost daily basis, drawing condemnation from Taipei. While the ministry offers daily updates on the locations of Chinese military aircraft, it only rarely gives details of where Chinese warships are operating, generally only when it detects aircraft carriers, as happened last week. A Chinese destroyer and a frigate entered waters to the southwest
The eastern extension of the Taipei MRT Red Line could begin operations as early as late June, the Taipei Department of Rapid Transit Systems said yesterday. Taipei Rapid Transit Corp said it is considering offering one month of free rides on the new section to mark its opening. Construction progress on the 1.4km extension, which is to run from the current terminal Xiangshan Station to a new eastern terminal, Guangci/Fengtian Temple Station, was 90.6 percent complete by the end of last month, the department said in a report to the Taipei City Council's Transportation Committee. While construction began in October 2016 with an
NON-RED SUPPLY: Boosting the nation’s drone industry is becoming increasingly urgent as China’s UAV dominance could become an issue in a crisis, an analyst said Taiwan’s drone exports to Europe grew 41.7-fold from 2024 to last year, with demand from Ukraine’s fight against Russian aggression the most likely driver of growth, a study showed. The Institute for Democracy, Society and Emerging Technology (DSET) in a statement on Wednesday said it found that many of Taiwan’s uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) sales were from Poland and the Czech Republic. These countries likely transferred the drones to Ukraine to aid it in its fight against the Russian invasion that started in 2022, it said. Despite the gains, Taiwan is not the dominant drone exporter to these markets, ranking second and fourth
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comment last year on Tokyo’s potential reaction to a Taiwan-China conflict has forced Beijing to rewrite its invasion plans, a retired Japanese general said. Takaichi told the Diet on Nov. 7 last year that a Chinese naval blockade or military attack on Taiwan could constitute a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan, potentially allowing Tokyo to exercise its right to collective self-defense. Former Japan Ground Self-Defense Force general Kiyofumi Ogawa said in a recent speech that the remark has been interpreted as meaning Japan could intervene in the early stages of a Taiwan Strait conflict, undermining China’s previous assumptions