The Taiwan Association of University Professors (TAUP) yesterday called for more government measures to counter Beijing’s move to offer residency permit cards to Taiwanese in China, which it said could have serious consequences for Taiwanese on a personal and national level.
The Chinese State Council Information Office on Aug. 16 announced that, starting tomorrow, Taiwanese, Hong Kongers and Macanese who have lived in China for more than six months and are legally working, living or studying in the country would be eligible to apply for a residence card.
Card holders would be granted certain rights and benefits enjoyed by Chinese citizens, such as compulsory education, social insurance and housing subsidies.
Photo: Chung Li-hua, Taipei Times
While the benefits might be attractive, the risks are unclear and the cards could have far-reaching consequences, Taiwan Association for Strategic Simulation (TASS) researcher Ho Cheng-hui (何澄輝) yesterday told a news conference in Taipei, adding that the policy is “another stick and carrot move designed to undermine Taiwan’s national status by treating it as a special administrative region.”
As examples of the risks involved, he said that residents who apply for their cards could be required to provide their fingerprints and other personal information to the Chinese government and subject themselves to Chinese tax laws.
Given Beijing’s attitude toward Taiwan, the two are unlikely to reach any tax agreements and Taiwanese residents in China could end up being taxed on both sides, he said.
Once the line between Taiwan and China begins to blur, Taiwanese could also become excluded from opportunities for technological exchanges and business cooperations with countries like the US, as more countries around the world are stepping up measures against Chinese economic espionage, he added.
Moreover, those who apply would be subject to China’s authoritarian laws banning free speech and other basic human rights, said Raymond Sung (宋承恩), a doctoral student at Oxford University.
“By applying for the permit, Taiwanese agree to Beijing’s political rule, which implies an obligation to help bring about unification and not support Taiwanese independence, and to obey Chinese laws restricting freedom of speech and other political rights,” he said.
The issue is further complicated by the uncertainty about the Taiwanese government’s role in legal disputes concerning the rights of Taiwanese residents in China, as it would be unclear whether they can still be considered Republic of China citizens, he added.
With the policy only days away from being implemented, the Taiwanese government must take action to reduce its effect, TAUP deputy secretary-general Chen Li-fu (陳俐甫) said.
As a countermeasure, he proposed redesignating Chinese residents in Taiwan as “Chinese,” rather than “mainland,” on official documents to enhance the distinction between Taiwanese and Chinese.
“That would not be to cut back official protection of their human rights, but to make it clearer that they are not citizens, as Beijing tries to blur that distinction,” he said.
Sung also said that household registrations of Taiwanese who apply for the permit should be canceled according to Article 9-1 of the Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例).
Removing a person’s household registration strips them of National Health Insurance coverage, but not their citizenship, he said, adding that people could reapply for a household registration.
Organizing one national referendum and 26 recall elections targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators could cost NT$1.62 billion (US$55.38 million), the Central Election Commission said yesterday. The cost of each recall vote ranges from NT$16 million to NT$20 million, while that of a national referendum is NT$1.1 billion, the commission said. Based on the higher estimate of NT$20 million per recall vote, if all 26 confirmed recall votes against KMT legislators are taken into consideration, along with the national referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant, the total could be as much as NT$1.62 billion, it said. The commission previously announced
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday welcomed NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte’s remarks that the organization’s cooperation with Indo-Pacific partners must be deepened to deter potential threats from China and Russia. Rutte on Wednesday in Berlin met German Chancellor Friedrich Merz ahead of a ceremony marking the 70th anniversary of Germany’s accession to NATO. He told a post-meeting news conference that China is rapidly building up its armed forces, and the number of vessels in its navy outnumbers those of the US Navy. “They will have another 100 ships sailing by 2030. They now have 1,000 nuclear warheads,” Rutte said, adding that such
Tropical Storm Nari is not a threat to Taiwan, based on its positioning and trajectory, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said yesterday. Nari has strengthened from a tropical depression that was positioned south of Japan, it said. The eye of the storm is about 2,100km east of Taipei, with a north-northeast trajectory moving toward the eastern seaboard of Japan, CWA data showed. Based on its current path, the storm would not affect Taiwan, the agency said.
The cosponsors of a new US sanctions package targeting Russia on Thursday briefed European allies and Ukraine on the legislation and said the legislation would also have a deterrent effect on China and curb its ambitions regarding Taiwan. The bill backed by US senators Lindsey Graham and Richard Blumenthal calls for a 500 percent tariff on goods imported from countries that buy Russian oil, gas, uranium and other exports — targeting nations such as China and India, which account for about 70 percent of Russia’s energy trade, the bankroll of much of its war effort. Graham and Blumenthal told The Associated Press
RSS