Sun, May 13, 2018 page3

• ANALYSIS: Diplomatic ally predicament requires new thinking

  • By Stacy Hsu / Staff reporter
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Having witnessed the nation’s loss of three diplomatic allies in the two years since President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took office, Taiwanese have either grown numb to such incidents or developed a penchant for knee-jerk reactions that mostly revolve around blaming Tsai’s non-conciliatory approach toward China.

  Since her inauguration in May 2016, Tsai has made it the cornerstone of her cross-strait policy to neither subject Taiwan to the “one China” framework, as demanded by Beijing, nor take provocative actions to unilaterally change the cross-strait “status quo.”

  While her adherence to this policy might be what has driven Beijing to poach Taipei’s diplomatic allies and further isolate the nation in the international arena, that is not the only reason: China’s actions also stem from its long-term, more extensive aim of projecting the image internationally that Taiwan is one of its territories and that Beijing is the sole legitimate government representing “China.”

  That is why similar incidents also occurred under Taiwanese leaders seeking to appease China, such as former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), albeit with lower intensity and frequency.

  Fixating on Tsai’s cross-strait policy against this backdrop would hardly help Taiwan shovel its way out of this diplomatic predicament, particularly given the limited wiggle room that either side of the Strait has provided the other for ending the stalemate.

  It is time to search for a solution from a fresh perspective.

  “China is not stealing Taipei’s diplomatic allies simply because Tsai won’t accept the ‘1992 consensus,’” said Bonnie Glaser, a senior adviser for Asia at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, referring to a tacit understanding between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.

  Glaser said Beijing’s behavior is also prompted by a series of “desinification” actions and pro-independence rhetoric from Tsai’s government, as well as the strengthening of Taiwan-US relations, especially in ways that are visible, because it challenges China’s sovereignty claims and threatens to undermine the CCP’s legitimacy.

  Stealing diplomatic allies is just one of the tools that China has at its disposal to punish Taiwan, she said, adding: “There is very little Tsai can do to stop it.”

  Steve Tsang (曾銳生), director of the London-based SOAS China Institute, said that while there is little Taiwan can do to prevent its diplomatic allies from being enticed by the world’s second-largest economy, the Taiwanese public’s response plays a decisive role in China’s willingness to continue its diplomatic game.

  “The general reactions from Taiwan play directly into the hands of Beijing. They become an incentive for Beijing to continue to snatch Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic allies one by one, in order to maximize political embarrassment and trouble for President Tsai,” Tsang said.

  If Taiwan ceased to care about its remaining diplomatic allies and its electorate could no longer be relied on to “make the right noises,” Tsang said there would be little value for Beijing to manage the switches controlling the nation’s diplomatic recognition.

  Tsang said Tsai should shift her focus to Taiwan’s non-diplomatic allies.

  “The real issue for Taiwan is for its citizens to be well treated and supported in foreign countries, the overwhelming majority of which are not Taiwan’s formal diplomatic allies,” he said. “It is time for Taiwan’s citizens to focus on what is really important rather than on what is largely symbolic.”

  US-based Project 2049 Institute research fellow Ian Easton called for closer Taiwan-US ties amid Beijing’s increasing attempts to undercut Taipei’s international support, including the establishment of a “normal, stable and constructive” relationship between Taipei and Washington over the long term.

  It is clear that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is eager to engage in dollar diplomacy, which goes hand in hand with his government’s use of political warfare to coerce and subvert foreign governments’ policies regarding Taiwan, Easton said.

  “They will be successful some of the time, but at a great cost to themselves, because this type of behavior is likely to result in a backlash from Washington,” he said.

  Minister of Foreign Affairs Joseph Wu’s (吳釗燮) innovative leadership could help bring about “some serious progress” in assuaging Taiwan’s diplomatic difficulties, he said.

  The ministry’s establishment of a new Indo-Pacific affairs section on Friday is regarded as part of Wu’s efforts to better incorporate Taiwan into the US’ new regional strategies.

  However, Lee Chun-yi (李駿怡), director of the University of Nottingham’s Taiwan Studies Program, believes that in the face of the pervasive “China factor,” the key to Taiwan maintaining its foreign relations — either with diplomatic or non-diplomatic allies — lies in “finding a niche.”

  Citing as an example the Tsai administration’s New Southbound Policy, Lee said that instead of simply setting up the National Development Fund, Taiwanese policymakers should invest time and energy in cultivating a group of experts to really understand the needs of the policy’s targeted nations and examine how Taiwan’s industrial outputs could meet those needs.

  “This will take time and effort, but it is much better than just setting up a national developmental fund without working closely with those countries’ needs,” Lee added.

  “Money is not the only thing,” she said, adding that concrete economic linkages are what could really help to strengthen ties.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Bologna advance to face AC Milan in Coppa final

  • 2

    Bukele proposes prisoner swap with Maduro

  • 3

    Wild’s top line too much for Vegas Golden Knights

  • 4

    HK, Macau residency rules tightened

  • 5

    Eric Chu, 2 others to be questioned for leading illegal assembly last week