President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who has expressed in public many times his wish to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), finally saw his dream come true on Saturday in Singapore, where a beaming Ma exchanged a historic handshake with the Chinese leader before a phalanx of international media.
While the Ma-Xi meeting has Ma basking in the global limelight, Ma’s attendance at the summit brought no benefits for Taiwan or Taiwanese. As a matter of fact, the Ma-Xi meeting only ended up degrading Taiwan’s international standing by trapping it in China’s “one China” framework (一中框架).
There were apparent efforts to present the meeting venue as politically neutral — neither Republic of China (ROC) nor People’s Republic of China flags were displayed at the Shangri-La Hotel. However, Xi made up for this apparent lack of nationalism by clearly reiterating China’s unwavering commitment to the “one China” principle from the get-go.
China’s will to impose its sovereignty was clearly evident in Xi’s repeated statements that both sides of the Taiwan Strait “belong to the same ‘one China.’”
Ma failed to offer any opposition to this: Ma mentioned the so-called “1992 consensus” during their meeting, but only said that it was subject to the “one China” principle, neglecting to mention the “different interpretations” component.
The “1992 consensus” refers to a supposed understanding reached during the cross-strait talks in 1992 that both Taiwan and China acknowledge that there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what that means.
For his part, Xi was unmistakably clear on China’s interpretation of the “understanding,” saying that “the importance of the ‘1992 consensus’ is that it reflects the ‘one China’ principle and clearly states that cross-strait relations are not ‘state-to-state’ relations involving ‘one China, one Taiwan.’”
“The peaceful development in cross-strait relations over the past seven years is predicated on both sides of the Taiwan Strait establishing a common political foundation for the upholding of the ‘1992 consensus’ and opposition to Taiwanese independence,” Xi said. “The forces seeking Taiwanese independence are the real threat to cross-strait peace and compatriots on both sides of the strait must unite and firmly oppose them.”
Xi also repeatedly said that “people on both sides of the Strait are Zhonghua minzu [Chinese ethnic group, 中華民族] and are all yan huang zisun [炎黃子孫 or descendants of emperors Yan and Huang], who should join hands to reinvigorate the Chinese [community].”
It is astonishing that Ma could sit through this type of rhetoric without voicing any objection to Xi’s statements, that marginalize the standing of the ROC and interfere with the Taiwanese right to self-determination.
In case Ma needs reminding, during his presidential campaign he told the public that “the future of Taiwan should of course be set by its 23 million people.”
However, on Saturday Ma played second fiddle to Xi, saying that the ROC Constitution does not allow “two Chinas, one China one Taiwan, nor Taiwanese independence.”
Ma added that he shares Xi’s view that it was mainly due to the “1992 consensus” that cross-strait relations have been able to “make tremendous progress over the past seven years,” and that he believed if any future president can promote the “1992 consensus” in the same way, “the ‘status quo’ will be maintained and continue to move forward.”
Having constructed his entire cross-strait policy on a fabricated consensus, Ma’s latest version of this mythic understanding not only places the ROC withing a “one China” framework conceived by Beijing, but is also an obvious attempt to limit the cross-strait options of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), should she win the presidential election in January.
Ma claims he is working to “improve cross-strait relations.” However, if this improvement brings about the loss of Taiwan’s right to self-determination then it is something Taiwanese must oppose.
What Ma trumpets as his cross-strait achievement in reaching a consensus with Xi on “upholding the ‘1992 consensus’” is at best a Pyrrhic victory for Taiwan and at worst a humiliating diplomatic defeat.
Ma might have satisfied his desire to salvage some sort of legacy by attaining a meeting with Xi; however, his success is a catastrophe for Taiwan, and his endorsement of Beijing’s “one China” was made without the consent of Taiwanese.
CLEAR BEFORE LEAVING: Two baby boys and a woman in her 30s tested negative before departing for Japan, but tests taken after their arrival came back postive Three Taiwanese tested positive for COVID-19 when they arrived in Japan earlier this month, the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) said yesterday as it reported a new imported case. Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), head of the center, said that one of the three cases in Japan is a Taiwanese baby under the age of one, whose parents work in Japan. The infant came to Taiwan with his parents in January, and the parents paid for the family’s COVID-19 tests on Oct. 10 ahead of their planned return to Japan on Monday last week, he said. The boy and his
‘BACKED BY ENEMY’: CTi News is one of the few channels promoting unification, the New Party chairman said, while pro-Taiwan groups called it a propaganda outlet Pan-blue camp supporters yesterday lodged a protest at the National Communications Commission (NCC) against what they say is a possible move by the government to shut down CTi News, adding that politics should not interfere with freedom of the press. Protesters included representatives from the New Party, the Blue Sky Action Alliance, the 333 Political Party Alliance and other pan-blue groups. “We stand here today because CTi News is one of the few media outlets in Taiwan that is still willing to give groups supporting unification with China a voice. If the news channel is gone, there would only be
NEW YEAR’S EVE: Examples from South Korea and Japan show that 15 local COVID-19 infections could emerge in a short period if measures are not taken The Taipei City Government would cancel its New Year’s Eve Party and all large events if 15 or more confirmed cases of COVID-19 are reported in the city within a week, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said yesterday. Addressing the Taipei Cross Border E-Commerce Annual Convention, Ko said the COVID-19 pandemic has brought many uncertainties to society, and that e-commerce is on a path of no return and would continue to grow. Many countries have not effectively controlled their COVID-19 outbreaks, and although Taiwan implements strict border controls and there have been few inbound passengers, the pandemic is unlikely to end soon,
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday accused CTi News of trying to mislead the public by publishing a half-page advert claiming that the party interfered in the National Communications Commission’s (NCC) review of its application for a license renewal. CTi News is distorting the commission’s review process by painting it as a political conflict and turning it into a smear campaign against the DPP, party spokeswoman Yen Juo-fang (顏若芳) said. “The NCC is an independent body, which carries out reviews and makes decisions based on its members’ professional expertise, as well as regulations and legal requirements governing media operations,” Yen said. “We condemn