Leaders of the Sunflower movement made a tour of Europe from Saturday to Wednesday to talk about the ideals of their movement.
Dennis Wei (魏揚) and Wu Cheng (吳崢), two of the leaders of the Sunflower movement which originated from a coalition of student protesters who took over the Legislative Yuan in Taipei for almost 23 days in March and April, visited the London School of Economics and Political Science on Saturday to give a talk on the economics, history and development of Taiwanese social movements, before meeting with officials from the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
They also visited Brussels and had separate meetings with three European political parties. They also had a separate meeting with the European External Action Service.
Wei and Wu were invited by the Taiwanese Students Association in the United Kingdom (TSAUK), the Formosan Association for Public Affairs in the UK (FAPA UK) and Danish organization Taiwan Corner, the main organizer of the trip.
Taiwan Corner chairman Michael Danielsen said he was very happy to see that political parties in Europe are interested in Taiwan and its social movements.
During an interview in London, Wei said the future of the Sunflower movement lies in keeping people whose paths merged with the movement continually interested with social activism.
The difficulty is that there are many definitions of “the future” held by participants in the movement, Wei said.
The movement must seek to strengthen the concept of “civil disobedience” and move away from keeping the movement within the bounds of “social movements,” Wei said, adding that this was not only the movement’s future, but also the future for all Taiwanese social movements.
Pointing to the Umbrella movement in Hong Kong which is strongly influenced by the Sunflower movement, Wei said that Taiwanese could continue to support the protesters by writing about it.
It is something that everyone can do, as Taiwan shares similar goals with the Hong Kong movement, Wei said.
Conflicts within families are not events particular to the Sunflower movement, but exist in every social movement — it is only that the Sunflower movement’s scale has made these conflicts more severe, Wei said.
It is not necessarily a bad thing, Wei said, adding that he did not feel it was good for individuals who believe in their cause to damage familial relations while trying to persuade others to see things from their point of view.
Wei said the movement is comprised of many different groups, and that future considerations and plans should not be placed under a general label, adding that he is aware that some groups within the organization plan to become politicians.
Wu said many of the younger generation still hope that political parties will eventually come around and match the expectations of the public.
If at some point the existing political parties can no longer be trusted, there will be people willing to implement political reform and take the appropriate action, Wu said.
At the talk in London, a Taiwanese living in the British capital had made sunflower cupcakes using bananas to avoid “misconceptions.”
The misconception refers to Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅), who apparently mistook the sunflowers carried by protesters for bananas.
NO ‘DESTRUCTION’: People should beware of messages from people expressing anti-US sentiments or questioning the US’ commitment to defend Taiwan, it said People should beware of false information designed to erode confidence in US commitments to defend Taiwan and damage Taiwan-US ties, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said yesterday. US radio talk show host Garland Nixon last week wrote on Twitter that sources said US President Joe Biden had warned about the “destruction of Taiwan.” “BREAKING NEWS: White House insiders leak that, when asked if there could be any greater disaster than the neocon Ukraine project, President Biden responded, wait until you see our plan for the destruction of Taiwan,” Nixon wrote. Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元) shared Nixon’s post on
TABLETOP STUDY: Researchers said China failed to seize Taiwan in the simulation, with the PLA losing 156 warships, while 40,000 soldiers were killed or wounded A war game by a Japanese think tank simulating a Chinese invasion of Taiwan resulted in a defeat for Beijing, with ghastly losses of troops and equipment on both sides, the Nikkei Asia magazine reported yesterday. The tabletop simulation conducted by the Sasakawa Peace Foundation envisioned the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) launching an amphibious attack on Taiwan in 2026 against the combined forces of Taiwan, Japan and the US, it said. The exercise was conducted over four days through Jan. 21, with close to 30 participants, including retired Japanese military officers, and academics and researchers from the US and Japan, it
OVER NT$5BN EARMARKED: The program would be funded with last year’s tax surplus and be part of efforts to entice 6 million foreigners to travel to Taiwan The Executive Yuan yesterday approved a Tourism Bureau proposal to allocate NT$5.3 billion (US$174.31 million) from last year’s surplus tax revenue to attract international tourists in the next three years. The bureau has funding to distribute the money — NT$5,000 each — to 500,000 international visitors, bureau Director-General Chang Shi-chung (張錫聰) told a news conference at the Ministry of Transportation and Communications in Taipei. “The money will be given out through multiple tourism promotion events this year, rather than giving it all out at once,” Chang said. “As such, not all international tourists would receive it.“ “International tourists who are given NT$5,000 will
Taiwan could survive a Chinese military assault unaided for two weeks if sufficient reserves were prepared for its defense, Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) said. “There is no need to debate whether the Chinese military is stronger and larger than Taiwan’s. Although it is big enough to start a war, it is not capable of defeating Taiwan in two weeks,” Chiu told the Chinese-language CommonWealth Magazine in an interview published on Tuesday. “Even if China wins, it will be unable to impose autocratic rule in a year, two years or even more than that, because Taiwanese are free people and