The head of an international delegation of electoral observers yesterday said remarks by a visiting former American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) director concerning today’s presidential election were “inexcusable” and were contrary to US commitments to Taiwan’s democracy.
Frank Murkowski, head of the international delegation for the International Committee for Fair Elections in Taiwan (ICFET), called a press conference after former AIT director Douglas Paal strongly endorsed in a TV interview the so-called “1992 consensus” adopted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), while calling the “Taiwan consensus” proposed by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) “impractical.”
Paal, who was invited by the government-affiliated Prospect Foundation to lead a delegation of monitors, also raised doubts about Tsai’s ability to ensure stability across the Taiwan Strait and insinuated that Washington was apprehensive about a DPP victory in the election.
Photo: Chien Jung-fong, Taipei Times
While describing the democratic process in Taiwan as “orderly” and “energetic,” Murkowski said the past two days had seen the emergence of “surprising activity.”
“I take strong issue with any inference of US policy favoring any candidate or party,” the former US senator told the press conference.
“That is simply not the case,” he said, adding that AIT Director William Stanton had reiterated to him by telephone yesterday that the AIT remained neutral in the election, while US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia and Pacific Affairs Kurt Campbell has also made comments reaffirming Washington’s neutrality.
Murkowski said the comments by Paal, now vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, were his own and that to suggest they reflected Washington’s view was inappropriate.
On Paal’s contention that if Tsai were elected the US would be “massively and quickly engaged to try to help her come to a formula that would preserve [cross-strait] peace and stability,” Murkowski said the remarks were “condescending” and that Tsai was a seasoned politician who was “perfectly capable to find a solution” to relations with Beijing.
Murkowski also dismissed as false Paal’s suggestion that a “leak” to the Financial Times by a senior US official raising concerns about Tsai’s ability to ensure peace across the Strait was a common view in Washington.
“This is editorializing to say the least,” Murkowski said, also taking exception with Paal’s reference to Tsai’s proposed “Taiwan consensus” as “too vague” to make Washington comfortable.
“I can assure you that Washington is never comfortable with anything,” the 78-year-old former senator said.
The “Taiwan consensus” represents an effort by Taiwanese to determine their future by democratic means, he said, adding that while the “1992 consensus” might have made sense in 1992, “things change.”
Paal’s comments were “careless” and “inexcusable,” he said, adding that it “challenges credulity [that Paal would presume] to speak for my government and the vast majority of Americans who have vast admiration for Taiwan’s democracy.”
They could also raise fears among Taiwanese voters over Washington’s commitment to the Taiwan Relations Act or Beijing’s reaction to the vote, he said.
Murkowski reiterated the ICFET’s mandate as an impartial body that does not favor any party or candidate, and raised issues with the delegation led by Paal, saying it was “quite contrary to the mission of a group that does not support any party.
The coast guard on Friday took a Chinese fishing boat and the 17 people on board into custody, after it rammed into a patrol boat while attempting to flee. A 100-tonne coast guard vessel at about 8am discovered a Chinese fishing boat illegally operating in waters about 11 nautical miles (20.4km) northwest of Hsinchu, the Hsinchu offshore flotilla of the Coast Guard Administration said. The crew refused to allow law enforcement to board the ship and attempted to flee, it added. The coast guard vessel and another ship chased the fishing boat for about a half hour, during which time the Chinese boat
Vice President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that Beijing was trying to “annex” Taiwan, while China said its recent series of drills near Taiwan are aimed at combating the “arrogance” of separatist forces. The Ministry of National Defense earlier this month said that it had observed dozens of Chinese fighters, drones, bombers and other aircraft, as well as warships and the Chinese aircraft carrier Shandong, operating nearby. The increased frequency of China’s military activities has raised the risk of events “getting out of hand” and sparking an accidental clash, Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) said last week. Asked about the spurt
RUNWAY UPGRADES: Airports and ports mainly scattered around southwestern Japan are being given major overhauls, primarily serving as civilian-use facilities Japan has chosen 33 airports and ports as candidates for improvement to enhance military capabilities, with a particular focus on infrastructure that could be utilized in a Taiwan emergency, according to a recent report in Japan’s Nikkei Shimbun. Citing the Japanese government’s fiscal budget proposal for next year, the newspaper said Toyko is to name some facilities as essential bases and receive funding for upgrades in line with the revamped national security strategy published last year. According to an unofficial policy document drafted last month and reviewed by the Nikkei, the Japanese government designated 14 airports and 19 ports for improvement, including
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Monday said he would not attend the official Double Ten National Day celebrations for the first time this year, as its English name, “Taiwan National Day,” implies “Taiwan independence.” Writing on Facebook, Ma said he has attended every National Day celebration since entering public service 40 years ago, but “with an exceedingly heavy heart,” has decided to reject this year’s invitation. For the past three years, the government under President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has used “Taiwan National Day” for the event’s official English-language title, leaving the “Republic of China” nowhere to be found, he said. The move