The KMT is a substantial organization and has a great deal of money. If I was a KMT politician, I would be fighting hard to gain control of this asset.
Why, then, have KMT leaders been leaving the party? And why, as noted in yesterday's Taipei Times, does the KMT have difficulty getting candidates? And why do many KMT candidates fail to mention their party affiliation? What is wrong with Taiwan's former ruling party?
I would argue one problem is the KMT's current leadership. On Tuesday, the KMT held a press conference for foreign journalists covering the election. KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) fielded all of these questions and left the foreign press corps distinctly unimpressed.
Lack of dialogue
One series of questions focused on the so-called "1992 consensus" and cross-strait relations. In response to a question about the "1992 consensus" being a trap for Taiwan, Lien said that the main problem between the two sides is a lack of dialogue.
He said the "1992 consensus" was a key that could open up the lock preventing dialogue. Lien further said that whatever contributed to discussion across the Strait is a good thing for both sides. Basically, Lien blamed the current government for the lack of dialogue.
Lien's response raises two questions that unfortunately were not asked at the time. First, since it has always been the Chinese side which has stopped dialogue, how can Taiwan have discussions if the other side does not wish to talk? Second, and more damaging, would Lien seriously maintain that accepting "one country, two systems" -- which would most definitely start a dialogue with China -- is good for Taiwan?
Lien also criticized the DPP government for its mismanagement of the economy. When asked what the KMT would do to solve Taiwan's economic problems, Lien said that the KMT had put several proposals to the Economic Development Advisory Council (EDAC), which form the basis of the KMT's economic policy. He later admitted that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) had accepted all of the EDAC proposals and that the DPP and KMT policies for the economy were identical. If the two parties have identical policies for the economy, why should voters choose the KMT?
Not so `localized'
Finally, Lien noted that the KMT is the most "localized" (本土) of Taiwan's political parties. It never occurred to him that all four party leaders on the dais with him were mainlanders and that Lien himself has "half-mainlander" (半山) status, being born in China of a Taiwanese father working with the KMT during the Japanese colonial period. If the KMT is so "localized," why were 4.5 of the five KMT leaders facing the foreign press mainlanders?
It should be noted that Lien had a substantial brains trust with him on the dais, yet he never turned to them for elaboration or comment.
Lien is undoubtedly a nice man. But he does not perform well in front of audiences and his presidential campaign last year was a disaster both in terms of his performance at rallies and in terms of the votes gained. My own belief is that his wooden performances result, at least in part, from shyness.
The party chairman may have performed well in the smaller arenas of central governmental and party bureaucratic politics. However, he clearly is not a leader in the larger, more public political arena of vigorous democratic electoral politics.
Should be flourishing
With its organization and wealth, the KMT should be flourishing. But in seeking to regain mainlanders' votes lost to the New Party and the PFP -- while hemorrhaging the majority Taiwanese vote base recruited by Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) -- the current KMT leadership is demonstrating an astonishing inability to count votes, a prime requirement for any democratic politician.
As Lee has suggested, a PhD in political science does not a politician make. Unless the KMT makes some drastic leadership changes after the election, its rapid decline will continue despite its organization and wealth.
Bruce Jacobs is a professor of Asian Languages and Studies and director of the Taiwan Research Unit at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia. He is contributing daily comment for the Taipei Times during the election campaign.
The CIA has a message for Chinese government officials worried about their place in Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) government: Come work with us. The agency released two Mandarin-language videos on social media on Thursday inviting disgruntled officials to contact the CIA. The recruitment videos posted on YouTube and X racked up more than 5 million views combined in their first day. The outreach comes as CIA Director John Ratcliffe has vowed to boost the agency’s use of intelligence from human sources and its focus on China, which has recently targeted US officials with its own espionage operations. The videos are “aimed at
STEADFAST FRIEND: The bills encourage increased Taiwan-US engagement and address China’s distortion of UN Resolution 2758 to isolate Taiwan internationally The Presidential Office yesterday thanked the US House of Representatives for unanimously passing two Taiwan-related bills highlighting its solid support for Taiwan’s democracy and global participation, and for deepening bilateral relations. One of the bills, the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, requires the US Department of State to periodically review its guidelines for engagement with Taiwan, and report to the US Congress on the guidelines and plans to lift self-imposed limitations on US-Taiwan engagement. The other bill is the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which clarifies that UN Resolution 2758 does not address the issue of the representation of Taiwan or its people in
US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo on Friday expressed concern over the rate at which China is diversifying its military exercises, the Financial Times (FT) reported on Saturday. “The rates of change on the depth and breadth of their exercises is the one non-linear effect that I’ve seen in the last year that wakes me up at night or keeps me up at night,” Paparo was quoted by FT as saying while attending the annual Sedona Forum at the McCain Institute in Arizona. Paparo also expressed concern over the speed with which China was expanding its military. While the US
SHIFT: Taiwan’s better-than-expected first-quarter GDP and signs of weakness in the US have driven global capital back to emerging markets, the central bank head said The central bank yesterday blamed market speculation for the steep rise in the local currency, and urged exporters and financial institutions to stay calm and stop panic sell-offs to avoid hurting their own profitability. The nation’s top monetary policymaker said that it would step in, if necessary, to maintain order and stability in the foreign exchange market. The remarks came as the NT dollar yesterday closed up NT$0.919 to NT$30.145 against the US dollar in Taipei trading, after rising as high as NT$29.59 in intraday trading. The local currency has surged 5.85 percent against the greenback over the past two sessions, central
RSS