While recent rulings of US courts against MP3.com and Napster have cast doubt on the future of the online MP3 music business, a debate has just begun in Taiwan over the legality of downloading MP3 files following a search at a university in southern Taiwan last week.
"If it is determined that it is illegal for students to download MP3 files for their own use, I guess over 90 percent of university students could be held liable for that," said an electronic engineering postgraduate student at National Taiwan University, referring to the search by the Tainan District Prosecutors' Office last Wednesday.
"We're aware of the controversies surrounding the online swapping of MP3 music files and that misuse of the technology may infringe on copyrights. But it has only just occurred to me that simply downloading MP3 music could get one into big trouble," he said, adding that he disapproved of the actions taken against the students of National Chengkung University (
MP3, a technology for compressing audio sounds or music on a computer, has become extremely popular with PC users in Taiwan, and especially university students, who have easy access to computers and feel that music CDs are too expensive.
It is all too common for students to grab MP3 music files from the Internet and keep them handy in their hard drives. And with dozens of Web sites providing free downloads of MP3 files, music can be obtained for almost nothing.
Moreover, where a full five-minute song would normally take up to 60Mb at a 44kHz sampling rate, it only takes 4 or 5Mb using MP3 compression, with no noticeable loss in quality.
Using the MP3 format, over 100 songs with different copyright ownerships can be kept on a single CD, but legally this often involves infringement of copyright.
In Taiwan, there have been cases where students who made a profit from selling pirated CDs produced using MP3 technology were found guilty of violating the Copyright Law.
Robin Lee (李瑞斌), secretary-general of the non-official International Federation of the Phonographics Industry (國際唱片交流協會), said that in 2000 there were 1,460 cases of crackdowns on the sale of pirated CDs at night markets, CD stores, as well as on campuses.
Lee said quite a few students set up their own Web sites providing free downloads of MP3 music files, while many more frequently use the free services without thinking of the legal consequences.
In the wake of the search at Chengkung University, a debate has emerged over whether students will be permitted to access MP3 music files for their own entertainment if they do not attempt to profit from it.
Chen Jen-chieh (
The forms of online reproduction include uploading, downloading, posting, forwarding, pasting, digitalizing, browsing and printing.
In theory, one could be held liable under the law for simply downloading or printing material from the Web without authorization.
However, Chen said the law allows exemptions under the circumstances of "fair use," which include the use of copyrighted materials for educational purposes, in the judicial process, or for personal non-profit use.
Therefore, the Chengkung University students could be exempted from liability if they keep the MP3 files only for their own use and do not try to profit from them.
In contrast, Chang Shau-ping (
Chang said that no pop music CDs are currently produced in MP3 format in Taiwan.
It follows that the online MP3 files themselves are illegal reproductions and, needless to say, downloading the illegally-reproduced files constitutes an infringement of copyrights.
"The students do not have any legal privileges. They're adults over 18 years old and should take responsibility for their actions," the prosecutor said, in light of the growing uproar among the university students against Wednesday's search.
While law enforcement agencies seem eager to put an end to what they view as illegal acts, there are scholars warning that an all-out crackdown might pose a threat to the development of the Internet.
Liu Ching-yi (
"While they are seeking to apply the existing copyright regulations to developing technologies, they should also think a step ahead about what will come next and think carefully whether their decisions today will hinder possible development of the Internet," she concluded.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
RSS