Minister of Justice Chen Ding-nan (
The remarks sparked criticism from prosecutors and academics.
Chen later altered his words but still failed to calm the voices of opposition. Critics said such a measure, if implemented, would seriously discourage prosecutors in their battle against crime.
Chen made the remarks in a breakfast meeting with cross-party lawmakers from the group New Taiwan Political Alliance (
They said that prosecutors must shoulder the responsibility when people are wrongly indicted.
Chen responded that in future prosecutors may be held responsible if the Supreme Court acquits defendants they indicted or if they cited the wrong legal articles when making the indictments.
Albert Tsai (蔡秋明), a divisional head prosecutor at Panchiao District Prosecutors' Office, said such measures would be inappropriate.
"The criteria according to which a prosecutor can indict, and a judge can convict a person, are different. A prosecutor can indict when there is criminal suspicion, while a conviction must be beyond reasonable doubt," Tsai said. "Prosecutors would become too strict [about evidence] and too discouraged from indicting suspects if they risked being held responsible just because the Supreme Court acquitted the defendants."
Besides, Tsai said, evidence and the cases themselves may change during the investigation and trial. For example, he said, in some disputes the complainants and the accused may reach a settlement after the indictment.
He stressed that the courts could also make mistakes and that an acquittal did not necessarily imply the innocence of the defendant or any error on the part of the prosecution.
He said it might be less unacceptable if the justice ministry set some standards -- other than acquittal by the Supreme Court -- to judge whether the prosecutors had abused their powers in making indictments. However, he also said such standards were extremely hard to set.
Tsai's comments came before the ministry issued a press release to backtrack on Chen's words in the afternoon. The press release said that Chen did not mean that in all cases of Supreme Court acquittals the indicting prosecutors should be investigated.
The press statement said that this would only be necessary when "there are serious procedural flaws and obvious incorrect citations of laws which cause grave harm to the rights of the defendants."
The statement said that there had not been enough time for Chen to go into specifics when meeting with the legislators in the morning.
Certain questions remained unanswered, however.
"In what circumstances, then, would an investigation be launched?" asked Chen Jui-jen (
"If it were the former, it would add tremendously to the workload of both investigators and the investigated."
Chen said there were already effective mechanisms in place preventing prosecutors from abusing powers.
A Chinese freighter that allegedly snapped an undersea cable linking Taiwan proper to Penghu County is suspected of being owned by a Chinese state-run company and had docked at the ports of Kaohsiung and Keelung for three months using different names. On Tuesday last week, the Togo-flagged freighter Hong Tai 58 (宏泰58號) and its Chinese crew were detained after the Taipei-Penghu No. 3 submarine cable was severed. When the Coast Guard Administration (CGA) first attempted to detain the ship on grounds of possible sabotage, its crew said the ship’s name was Hong Tai 168, although the Automatic Identification System (AIS)
An Akizuki-class destroyer last month made the first-ever solo transit of a Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force ship through the Taiwan Strait, Japanese government officials with knowledge of the matter said yesterday. The JS Akizuki carried out a north-to-south transit through the Taiwan Strait on Feb. 5 as it sailed to the South China Sea to participate in a joint exercise with US, Australian and Philippine forces that day. The Japanese destroyer JS Sazanami in September last year made the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force’s first-ever transit through the Taiwan Strait, but it was joined by vessels from New Zealand and Australia,
SECURITY: The purpose for giving Hong Kong and Macau residents more lenient paths to permanent residency no longer applies due to China’s policies, a source said The government is considering removing an optional path to citizenship for residents from Hong Kong and Macau, and lengthening the terms for permanent residence eligibility, a source said yesterday. In a bid to prevent the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) from infiltrating Taiwan through immigration from Hong Kong and Macau, the government could amend immigration laws for residents of the territories who currently receive preferential treatment, an official familiar with the matter speaking on condition of anonymity said. The move was part of “national security-related legislative reform,” they added. Under the amendments, arrivals from the Chinese territories would have to reside in Taiwan for
CRITICAL MOVE: TSMC’s plan to invest another US$100 billion in US chipmaking would boost Taiwan’s competitive edge in the global market, the premier said The government would ensure that the most advanced chipmaking technology stays in Taiwan while assisting Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) in investing overseas, the Presidential Office said yesterday. The statement follows a joint announcement by the world’s largest contract chipmaker and US President Donald Trump on Monday that TSMC would invest an additional US$100 billion over the next four years to expand its semiconductor manufacturing operations in the US, which would include construction of three new chip fabrication plants, two advanced packaging facilities, and a research and development center. The government knew about the deal in advance and would assist, Presidential
RSS