The legislature's recent resolution to oblige prosecutor generals to attend its interpellation sessions has caused concern that the independence of criminal investigations may be undermined, according to district prosecutors interviewed by the Taipei Times yesterday.
The Judicial Committee of the Legislative Yuan on Monday made the resolution that prosecutor generals of all prosecutors' offices, must come to committee sessions to answer legislators' interpellations when invited by the committee to do so.
Currently, in accordance with established practice, prosecutor generals only attend budget review sessions.
The resolution says, however, that lawmakers' inquiries to prosecutor generals should only be about general affairs and not involve particular cases under investigation.
But some doubt whether that stipulation will always be obeyed.
"They [legislators] may start with general affairs but move on to particular cases," a district prosecutor general said. "Recently, many lawmakers focused on particular cases under investigation [during interpellation in the budget review session]" the prosecutor general said.
All of the three district prosecutor generals interviewed by the Taipei Times spoke on condition of anonymity.
Minister of Justice Chen Ding-nan (
"When legislators go to particular cases, can you really refuse to answer?" the district prosecutor general asked.
"If your answer does not satisfy them, they complain that you disrespect the legislature; if you tell too much, you risk breaking the rule which states that details of investigations must not be made public."
Chen has been standing firm against lawmakers' demands since the last legislative session, saying that such practices would bring legislative interference into the judiciary.
Dissatisfied with Chen's stance, the Judicial Committee has refused to review the justice ministry's budget since Nov. 30.
It was not until after the committee reached the resolution on Monday evening that it resumed its review of the justice ministry's budget and passed it quickly.
Another district prosecutor general said inquiries by legislators would put pressure on prosecutors' investigative work.
He said it seemed inevitable that some lawmakers would "lobby" for certain cases.
But KMT Legislator James Chen (陳健治), who spearheaded the resolution, said it was a good thing for prosecutors to feel "pressure."
"The pressure is to remind them not to infringe human rights," Chen said.
"From several recent incidents, such as the search of the China Times Express newsroom, there have been signs that prosecutors have abused their power. This can only be prevented by the scrutiny of the legislature."
He argued that as prosecutors are under the justice ministry, which is under the Executive Yuan, there could be no such problem as the legislature interfering with the judiciary.
Taiwan Independence Party (建國黨) lawmaker Lee Ching-hsiung (李慶雄) opposed the resolution, however. He said that the justice minister can be held accountable on issues such as human rights and administrative matters and there is no need to ask prosecutor generals to come to the legislature.
He also said the agreement not to touch particular cases would not constrain lawmakers, "because some particular cases involve partisan interests while lawmakers have their political concerns."
The first district prosecutor general also said: "If [legislators] can't ask questions about specific cases, there is actually nothing else to inquire about."
The third district prosecutor general said "We respect their [lawmakers'] decision. Whatever they decide we will just do it. What else can we do?"
The third prosecutor-general recently came under fire from a legislator for refusing to answer questions from legislators about a specific case.
Conflict with Taiwan could leave China with “massive economic disruption, catastrophic military losses, significant social unrest, and devastating sanctions,” a US think tank said in a report released on Monday. The German Marshall Fund released a report titled If China Attacks Taiwan: The Consequences for China of “Minor Conflict” and “Major War” Scenarios. The report details the “massive” economic, military, social and international costs to China in the event of a minor conflict or major war with Taiwan, estimating that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could sustain losses of more than half of its active-duty ground forces, including 100,000 troops. Understanding Chinese
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday said it is closely monitoring developments in Venezuela, and would continue to cooperate with democratic allies and work together for regional and global security, stability, and prosperity. The remarks came after the US on Saturday launched a series of airstrikes in Venezuela and kidnapped Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, who was later flown to New York along with his wife. The pair face US charges related to drug trafficking and alleged cooperation with gangs designated as terrorist organizations. Maduro has denied the allegations. The ministry said that it is closely monitoring the political and economic situation
UNRELENTING: China attempted cyberattacks on Taiwan’s critical infrastructure 2.63 million times per day last year, up from 1.23 million in 2023, the NSB said China’s cyberarmy has long engaged in cyberattacks against Taiwan’s critical infrastructure, employing diverse and evolving tactics, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said yesterday, adding that cyberattacks on critical energy infrastructure last year increased 10-fold compared with the previous year. The NSB yesterday released a report titled Analysis on China’s Cyber Threats to Taiwan’s Critical Infrastructure in 2025, outlining the number of cyberattacks, major tactics and hacker groups. Taiwan’s national intelligence community identified a large number of cybersecurity incidents last year, the bureau said in a statement. China’s cyberarmy last year launched an average of 2.63 million intrusion attempts per day targeting Taiwan’s critical
‘SLICING METHOD’: In the event of a blockade, the China Coast Guard would intercept Taiwanese ships while its navy would seek to deter foreign intervention China’s military drills around Taiwan this week signaled potential strategies to cut the nation off from energy supplies and foreign military assistance, a US think tank report said. The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) conducted what it called “Justice Mission 2025” exercises from Monday to Tuesday in five maritime zones and airspace around Taiwan, calling them a warning to “Taiwanese independence” forces. In a report released on Wednesday, the Institute for the Study of War said the exercises effectively simulated blocking shipping routes to major port cities, including Kaohsiung, Keelung and Hualien. Taiwan would be highly vulnerable under such a blockade, because it