The New Taipei City District Court yesterday sentenced a woman to seven years and two months in prison for murdering her husband in Taiwan’s first-ever criminal case to be tried by a mixed collegiate bench of lay and professional judges.
Taiwan began assigning lay judges with the implementation of the Citizen Judges Act (國民法官法) on Jan. 1.
A woman surnamed Chi (季), aged 63, was accused of stabbing her husband, surnamed Fan (范), aged 72, in his sleep on the evening of Nov. 30 last year.
Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times
She confessed to the killing but pled for leniency on grounds of diminished capacity by mental duress and pitiable circumstances respectively under Article 19 and Article 59 of the Criminal Code, the court said in the verdict.
The prosecution did not contest the part of the defense’s case arguing that Chi’s voluntary surrender to the authorities qualified the defendant for sentencing mitigation, it said.
Chi claimed to be a victim of chronic domestic abuse by the deceased, which the prosecution also did not dispute, it said.
The prosecution contended that the accused was not acting under extreme mental duress at the time of the killing and her circumstances, albeit worth of sympathy, did not entitle her to further reductions to her sentencing, it said.
The prosecution said that Chi would serve a shorter time in prison than the sentence for aggravated assault, if the court allowed further sentence reductions in addition to her voluntary surrender.
The collegiate bench accepted the prosecution’s argument saying, based on Chi’s psychiatric examination, her capacity was not diminished at the time of the murder, it said.
The examiner’s testimony indicated that Chi was aware that murder was against the law and that options other than that were available at the time of the crime, the court said.
The court rejected the plea to reduce Chi’s sentence due to pitiable circumstances, as her case does not meet the legal standard “the offense is so pitiable that even the minimum punishment is considered too severe.”
Therefore, the bench accepted the prosecution’s position that Chi should receive a prison term of between eight and 12 years, the court said.
The collegiate bench handed down the sentence — which was close to the minimum prison term demanded by the prosecution — after three days of deliberations.
The lay members of the bench have performed well in keeping their focus and being attentive to details, a legal expert who observed the case as part of the public audience said on condition of anonymity.
The lay judges repeatedly asked to examine the “gruesome” crime scene photographs and asked relevant questions, they said.
Though some of the questions posed by the lay judges can be construed as prejudicial, these missteps fall into the normal range of expectations, they said, adding that the system of lay judges was meant to empower ordinary citizens.
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS