The consequences of invading Taiwan would be “grim” for Beijing even if it were a military success, the US-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) said in a report on Tuesday.
Any success China might achieve in annexing Taiwan by force would be a “Pyrrhic victory,” as its political, economic and diplomatic position would likely be worse than before, analysts Jude Blanchette and Gerard DiPippo wrote in the report.
“China will have gained Taiwan, but sacrificed its larger ambition of becoming a global and comprehensive superpower,” they wrote.
Photo: Sam Yeh, AFP
Beijing’s military, economic and propagada preparations for war would be hard to conceal, and Washington would likely be at least partially alerted, which would lead to efforts to warn allies to counter the invasion via sanctions and the threat of military force, the report said.
Core US allies, including Australia, Japan and the UK, would likely coordinate a response to deter China, but a lot would depend on the credibility of Washington’s intelligence and leadership at such a time, it said, adding that other governments could be slow to respond.
Were a conflict to begin, the damage to the global economy would be devastating, as commercial shipping would collapse, supply chains would be disrupted and financial markets would panic to a degree potentially exceeding the 2008 recession, it said.
Beijing would be more hard-hit by the crisis due to the measures it would have to take to sustain the war effort, likely including capital controls, sales of overseas assets, rationing, and hardening of military bases and population centers on its economically vital coast, Blanchette and DiPippo wrote.
Assuming that Taiwan were to resists the invasion and the US was engaged militarily, the war could become intense and protracted, resulting in extensive economic damage to China, they wrote.
A year-long conflict between the US and China would probably reduce China’s GDP by 25 to 35 percent, while US GDP would fall 5 to 10 percent, they said, citing a RAND Corp study from 2016.
Maritime trade and air freight in and around the conflict zone crucial to China would be disrupted, as China’s six largest ports are near Taiwan and would likely be affected, they said.
A substantial number of the multinational corporations that do business in China would likely flee the country to avoid risk to employees and business interests stemming from war, while exporters and parts-sourcing firms might redirect operations to safer regions, the report said.
Capital flight from China would take place as investors and firms race to avoid being affected by Western sanctions, it said, adding that sales of Chinese shares and holdings would cause the yuan to plummet.
Economic sanctions would be severe, assuming US forces are directly engaged, as Washington and the US public would not tolerate partners that continued to trade or invest in China, even if US military casualties were low, it said.
“A Western sanctions coalition could coalesce quickly, as happened after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, in part because of lessons learned and coordination mechanisms established in response to the sanctions against Russia,” it said.
Taiwan’s economy would be ravaged with disastrous consequences to China, as 60 percent of microchip exports from the country go to Chinese firms that produce electronics exported to the West, it said.
Even if victorious, China’s political, economic and diplomatic challenges would be compounded, as Beijing would have to occupy, stabilize and rebuild a hostile territory that formerly enjoyed a higher standard of living than much of China, Blanchette and DiPippo wrote.
Moreover, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry — including the world’s largest contract chipmaker, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp (TSMC) — would be damaged beyond repair, while control of facilities would “only give China a snapshot of its technology,” they wrote.
Semiconductor factories in a hypothetically occupied Taiwan would lose their value overseas, while TSMC’s overseas facilities would be disconnected or absorbed by other firms, they wrote.
Even were Beijing to stave off US resistance, its relationship with other advanced economies would deteriorate significantly, which could lead to export controls and sanctions for months or years, the report said.
China would suffer more from the resulting trade barriers because G7 economies collectively are 65 percent larger than China’s, and Beijing has little hope of overcoming its key dependencies in technology, commodities and US currency in the medium term, it said.
Furthermore, Asian countries in China’s periphery would be driven into the arms of the US if Washington puts up a credible military performance, or if it failed, they would be spurred into increasing military spending and creating nuclear programs, the report said.
“The conclusion reached is stark: China would court disaster if it launched an invasion across the Taiwan Strait,” it said, adding: “The key strategic challenge for the US remains to ensure Beijing never actively contemplates an attack on Taiwan.”
While Beijing likely has a general understanding of the costs associated with a military venture in Taiwan, the growing isolation of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) could “lead to groupthink in Beijing’s policymaking” that raises the risk of miscalculation, it said.
AIR SUPPORT: The Ministry of National Defense thanked the US for the delivery, adding that it was an indicator of the White House’s commitment to the Taiwan Relations Act Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) and Representative to the US Alexander Yui on Friday attended a delivery ceremony for the first of Taiwan’s long-awaited 66 F-16C/D Block 70 jets at a Lockheed Martin Corp factory in Greenville, South Carolina. “We are so proud to be the global home of the F-16 and to support Taiwan’s air defense capabilities,” US Representative William Timmons wrote on X, alongside a photograph of Taiwanese and US officials at the event. The F-16C/D Block 70 jets Taiwan ordered have the same capabilities as aircraft that had been upgraded to F-16Vs. The batch of Lockheed Martin
GRIDLOCK: The National Fire Agency’s Special Search and Rescue team is on standby to travel to the countries to help out with the rescue effort A powerful earthquake rocked Myanmar and neighboring Thailand yesterday, killing at least three people in Bangkok and burying dozens when a high-rise building under construction collapsed. Footage shared on social media from Myanmar’s second-largest city showed widespread destruction, raising fears that many were trapped under the rubble or killed. The magnitude 7.7 earthquake, with an epicenter near Mandalay in Myanmar, struck at midday and was followed by a strong magnitude 6.4 aftershock. The extent of death, injury and destruction — especially in Myanmar, which is embroiled in a civil war and where information is tightly controlled at the best of times —
Taiwan was ranked the fourth-safest country in the world with a score of 82.9, trailing only Andorra, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar in Numbeo’s Safety Index by Country report. Taiwan’s score improved by 0.1 points compared with last year’s mid-year report, which had Taiwan fourth with a score of 82.8. However, both scores were lower than in last year’s first review, when Taiwan scored 83.3, and are a long way from when Taiwan was named the second-safest country in the world in 2021, scoring 84.8. Taiwan ranked higher than Singapore in ninth with a score of 77.4 and Japan in 10th with
SECURITY RISK: If there is a conflict between China and Taiwan, ‘there would likely be significant consequences to global economic and security interests,’ it said China remains the top military and cyber threat to the US and continues to make progress on capabilities to seize Taiwan, a report by US intelligence agencies said on Tuesday. The report provides an overview of the “collective insights” of top US intelligence agencies about the security threats to the US posed by foreign nations and criminal organizations. In its Annual Threat Assessment, the agencies divided threats facing the US into two broad categories, “nonstate transnational criminals and terrorists” and “major state actors,” with China, Russia, Iran and North Korea named. Of those countries, “China presents the most comprehensive and robust military threat