The Chinese government is finding new ways to intimidate foreign journalists, their Chinese colleagues and their sources, and harassment has reached such a high level that at least six have left the country, a key report said yesterday.
The methods include online trolling, physical assaults, hacking and visa denials, as well as what appears to be official encouragement of lawsuits or threats of legal action against journalists, “typically filed by sources long after they have explicitly agreed to be interviewed.”
The report, compiled by the Foreign Correspondents’ Club of China (FCCC), said: “The FCCC highlights this development with alarm, as foreigners involved in civil or criminal lawsuits and court proceedings in China can be banned from leaving the country, based on past precedent.”
Photo: EPA-EFE
Under the rule of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), China has grown increasingly authoritarian, with worsening crackdowns on press freedom and harassment of foreign media and their staff.
Cheng Lei (成蕾), an Australian journalist for the state broadcaster China Global Television Network, and Haze Fan (范若伊), a Chinese journalist for Bloomberg, remain in jail after more than a year.
In the report, the FCCC compiled the results of its annual member survey. It found high rates of reported incidents of harassment and intimidation, and said the heightened dangers had prompted many foreign journalists and outlets to develop emergency exit plans.
Former BBC correspondent John Sudworth was forced to leave China with his wife, Yvonne Murray, who is a foreign correspondent for RTE and their children after significant harassment and intimidation, and threats of legal action over his investigative reporting.
“As we made our hasty exit, the plainclothes police tailing us and our young children to the airport were final proof of the dangers we faced and of China’s deep intolerance for independent journalism,” he said.
The FCCC said at least eight other foreign correspondents had been threatened with legal action or sued by government entities or sources, “detract[ing] from their time reporting and plunging them into great personal risk.”
The FCCC found that 62 percent of respondents reported being obstructed at least once by police or other officials, and 47 percent by unidentified individuals.
It said 12 percent were “manhandled or subjected to other forms of physical force” while reporting.
During the floods in Henan Province last summer, several Western journalists were physically confronted by people angry at their attempts to report on the disaster and investigate official cover-ups that were later confirmed by China’s central government.
Almost one-quarter of respondents said they were targeted for their reporting in online smear campaigns, with trolling disproportionately targeting female journalists of East Asian descent and the Chinese employees of foreign outlets, including sexual innuendo and “alarming threats of physical violence.”
“After a state-linked blog published numerous exposes criticising my reporting from a half year ago as ‘illegal,’ hundreds of Chinese social media accounts began posting my picture along with comments like ‘beat her to death’ and describing sexual acts,” National Public Radio correspondent Emily Feng (馮哲芸) said.
The attacks were sometimes directly encouraged or instigated by the state or state-backed entities, the report said, while government officials and ambassadors regularly wrote public diatribes against Western reporters.
The FCCC said the attacks demonstrated an “emboldened Chinese government willing to go to great lengths to discredit foreign journalists and their work.”
However, it said that “none of this has stopped foreign journalists from doing their job, nor major global news organisations from going after the stories that matter.”
Many outlets have had to find ways to report from outside China, with dozens of journalists still barred after their expulsion in 2020 and last year, which was the “single biggest blow to international reporting in China,” said Steven Lee Myers, the New York Times’ expelled Beijing bureau chief, who is now based in Seoul.
Jonathan Cheng, the Beijing bureau chief for the Wall Street Journal, said: “It has tested our resourcefulness, and there are some things we simply are unable to do from afar, much of it related to bringing our readers outside [of] China’s biggest cities.”
China reporters are now based in Taipei, Singapore, Sydney and London, covering the country remotely or awaiting visa approvals.
Late last year, China and the US agreed to ease visa restrictions on journalists from each other’s countries, but few have been processed.
In the FCCC survey, 46 percent of respondents said their China bureaus were understaffed because they had not been able to bring in enough journalists.
The survey also found that Chinese authorities and officials were still using COVID-19 measures and border restrictions to delay visa approvals, stifle reporting trips, deny access to some locations and decline interview requests.
More than half of respondents said they had been told to leave a place or had been denied access for health and safety reasons, even though they presented no risk.
Hong Kong’s stringent border rules had also added to pressure on foreign journalists already reporting increased difficulty under the territory’s National Security Law and crackdown on the press.
CREDIT-GRABBER: China said its coast guard rescued the crew of a fishing vessel that caught fire, who were actually rescued by a nearby Taiwanese boat and the CGA Maritime search and rescue operations do not have borders, and China should not use a shipwreck to infringe upon Taiwanese sovereignty, the Coast Guard Administration (CGA) said yesterday. The coast guard made the statement in response to the China Coast Guard (CCG) saying it saved a Taiwanese fishing boat. The Chuan Yu No. 6 (全漁6號), a fishing vessel registered in Keelung, on Thursday caught fire and sank in waters northeast of Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台). The vessel left Keelung’s Badouzih Fishing Harbor (八斗子漁港) at 3:35pm on Sunday last week, with seven people on board — a 62-year-old Taiwanese captain surnamed Chang (張) and six
RISKY BUSINESS: The ‘incentives’ include initiatives that get suspended for no reason, creating uncertainty and resulting in considerable losses for Taiwanese, the MAC said China’s “incentives” failed to sway sentiment in Taiwan, as willingness to work in China hit a record low of 1.6 percent, a Ministry of Labor survey showed. The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) also reported that the number of Taiwanese workers in China has nearly halved from a peak of 430,000 in 2012 to an estimated 231,000 in 2024. That marked a new low in the proportion of Taiwanese going abroad to work. The ministry’s annual survey on “Labor Life and Employment Status” includes questions respondents’ willingness to seek employment overseas. Willingness to work in China has steadily declined from
The number of pet cats in Taiwan surpassed that of pet dogs for the first time last year, reaching 1,742,033, a 32.8 percent increase from 2023, the Ministry of Agriculture said yesterday, citing a survey. By contrast, the number of pet dogs declined slightly by 1.2 percent over the same period to 1,462,528, the ministry said. Despite the shift, households with dogs still slightly outnumber those with cats by 1.2 percent. However, while the number of households with multiple dogs has remained relatively stable, households keeping more than two cats have increased, contributing to the overall rise in the feline population. The trend
The Legislative Yuan’s Finance Committee yesterday approved proposed amendments to the Amusement Tax Act (娛樂稅法) that would abolish taxes on films, cultural activities and competitive sporting events, retaining the fee only for dance halls and golf courses. The proposed changes would set the maximum tax rate for dance halls and golf courses at 50 and 20 percent respectively, with local governments authorized to suspend the levies. Article 2 of the act says that “amusement tax shall be levied on tickets sold or fees charged by amusement places, facilities or activities” in six categories: “Cinema; professional singing, story-telling, dancing, circus, magic show, acrobatics