China has declared primaries held by Hong Kong’s pro-democracy parties at the weekend “illegal” and the territory’s leader has announced an investigation, saying that the candidates’ intention to vote against government legislation could contravene national security legislation.
The primary polls, while not a formal part of Hong Kong’s election process, drew an estimated 610,000 people out to vote for pro-democracy candidates ahead of the Hong Kong Legislative Council (LegCo) elections scheduled for September.
The extraordinary turnout in the face of warnings by authorities was interpreted by observers as an act of opposition to the national security legislation imposed by Beijing on June 30.
Photo: AFP
As the pro-democracy protest movement continued throughout last year and an unprecedented number of pro-democracy candidates were voted in at district council elections, there has been growing confidence that the pro-Beijing members in the LegCo could be sent into minority.
With the primaries, organizers sought to determine a shortlist of candidates to avoid splitting the votes.
Late on Monday, Beijing’s top representatives in Hong Kong labeled the primaries “illegal” and accused organizers of colluding with foreign powers in a “serious provocation” of Hong Kong’s electoral system and to seize the private data of voters.
“The goal of organizer Benny Tai (戴耀廷) and the opposition camp is to seize the ruling power of Hong Kong and ... carry out a Hong Kong version of ‘color revolution,’” said a spokesman for the Hong Kong Liaison Office of the Central People’s Government, whose chief is also in charge of implementing the national security legislation.
The statement came in support of Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥), who said that democrats coordinating to win a majority and veto the government’s budget could be against the anti-sedition laws, and would be investigated.
“If this so-called ‘primary’ election’s purpose is to achieve the ultimate goal of delivering what they call a ‘35+’ [majority seats] with the objective of objecting to, resisting every policy initiative of the Hong Kong [Special Administrative Region] government, then it may fall into the category of subverting the state power, which is now one of the four types of offenses under the new National Security Law,” Lam told media late on Monday.
Lam said that she was not saying the primaries did contravene the law, but warned that if an investigation proved as much “there is certainly a case to answer.”
Legal academic and an organizer of the primaries and the 2014 Occupy Central protests, Tai, said that LegCo’s power to veto the budget was enshrined in Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, the Basic Law.
“How can a power that is recognized by the Basic Law be breaching the national security legislation?” he asked.
Preliminary results from the primary polls showed favorable results for candidates who were younger, pro-self determination or localist, and those who had high profiles during the protest movement, including Joshua Wong (黃之鋒).
RISK REMAINS: An official said that with the US presidential elections so close, it is unclear if China would hold war games or keep its reaction to angry words The Ministry of National Defense said it was “on alert” as it detected a Chinese aircraft carrier group to Taiwan’s south yesterday amid concerns in Taiwan about the possibility of a new round of Chinese war games. The ministry said in a statement that a Chinese navy group led by the carrier Liaoning had entered waters near the Bashi Channel, which connects the South China Sea and the Pacific Ocean and separates Taiwan from the Philippines. It said the carrier group was expected to enter the Western Pacific. The military is keeping a close watch on developments and “exercising an
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
RESILIENCE: Once the system is operational, there would be no need to worry about the risks posed by disasters or other emergencies on communication systems, an official said Taiwan would have 24-hour access to low Earth orbit satellites by the end of this month through service provided by Eutelsat OneWeb as part of the nation’s effort to enhance signal resilience, a Chunghwa Telecom Co (中華電信) official said yesterday. Earlier this year the Ministry of Digital Affairs, which partnered with Chunghwa Telecom on a two-year project to boost signal resilience throughout the nation, said it reached a milestone when it made contact with OneWeb’s satellites half of the time. It expects to have the capability to maintain constant contact with the satellites and have nationwide coverage by the end
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
RSS