Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps was holding a British-flagged oil tanker after seizing it in the Strait of Hormuz amid soaring tensions in one of the world’s critical energy chokepoints. British officials have demanded the immediate release of the vessel.
The Stena Impero crashed into a fishing vessel and had been taken to the Bandar Abbas port for investigation, Iran’s state-run Islamic Republic News Agency said.
The crew — which has 18 Indian nationals and five others, including from Russia, the Philippines and Latvia — would remain on board for safety reasons, it reported, citing Allahmorad Afifipour, the head of the Ports and Maritime Organization in Iran’s Hormozgan Province.
Photo: EPA-EFE / Jan Verhoog / Marinetraffic.com
None of the crew are British nationals, he said.
British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Jeremy Hunt and other top British officials held an emergency meeting on Friday evening over the capture of the Stena Impero and a second vessel, which was later released.
The British Foreign and Commonwealth Office said in a statement that “our response will be considered and robust, and there will be serious consequences if the situation is not resolved.”
It also advised that British ships should “stay out of the area for an interim period.”
Iran was retaliating against the seizure of an Iranian ship by Gibraltar, Hunt said on Twitter.
The second ship, the Liberian-flagged Mesdar, re-established contact with its UK-based manager and was moving away from the Iranian coast, according to ship tracking data compiled by Bloomberg.
US President Donald Trump said he would be “working with the UK” and suggested the latest developments justify his harsher approach toward Tehran.
“This only goes to show what I’m saying about Iran: trouble, nothing but trouble,” Trump said.
France and Germany expressed their support for the UK, with both nations demanding the immediate release of the ship and its crew.
On Friday night, US Central Command announced it was putting in place “a multinational maritime effort” called Operation Sentinel that would “increase surveillance of and security in key waterways in the Middle East to ensure freedom of navigation in light of recent events in the Arabian Gulf region.”
A spokesman for the Iranian Guardian Council said that the move against at least one of the ships was in retaliation for the British seizure off Gibraltar of a tanker carrying Iranian crude earlier this month.
Earlier in the day, a court in Gibraltar ordered the continued detention of the vessel, the Grace 1, for another 30 days, after it was held on suspicion of transporting oil to Syria.
Iran has denied that was the tanker’s destination.
“The rule of retaliation is something that’s recognized within international law and is used in relation to wrong measures taken by a government,” council spokesman Abbasali Kadkhodaei told the Islamic Republic News Agency.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS