There is no room for Taiwanese independence, because the nature of the cross-strait relationship is not one between two nations, former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) said yesterday in a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), calling for ties to be furthered based on the so-called “1992 consensus.”
Yesterday’s meeting, the fourth between the two since 2013, took place at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing.
Addressing each other as “chairman,” Lien and Xi shook hands before each made remarks at the meeting, which was open to the media for only the first 15 minutes, with the remainder conducted behind closed doors.
Photo: CNA
The current complicated and dire situations facing cross-strait ties have concerned many on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, Xi said.
“Nevertheless, I still believe that when the ‘Great Way’ prevails, it corresponds with the will of the people and the irresistible trend of the times,” Xi said. “We have always paid close attention to the trend of history and we know in which direction it is heading.”
With China’s rise to power, Beijing is now closer than ever to reaching its two centennial goals and the objective of reinvigorating the Zhonghua minzu (Chinese ethnic group, 中華民族), he said.
As long as both sides calibrate historical coordinates and hold the steering wheel tightly, “the historical ship of peaceful cross-strait development and unification is bound to sail toward the shore of victory,” Xi said.
From 2008 to 2016, both sides of the Taiwan Strait were able to engage in practical negotiations and close communication on the basis of the “1992 consensus,” while no interactions were seen between North and South Korea, said Lien, who was Chinese National Party (KMT) chairman from 2000 to 2005.
However, the situations have been reversed, with cross-strait relations locked in a stalemate, but a glimmer of hope for peace emerging on the Korean Peninsula, he said.
At the meeting, Lien proposed four ideas to improve cross-strait ties and maintain stability in the region, including that both sides “find common ground on the ‘one China’ principle, while preserving their differences on the meaning of ‘one China,’” Lien’s office said in a news release.
“Both of our legal and governance systems were built following the ‘one China’ structure. That is why cross-strait relations are not state-to-state relations and there is no room for Taiwanese independence,” Lien said.
The “1992 consensus” was designed to allow both sides to find common ground and preserve their differences, Lien said, adding that based on past experiences, Taipei and Beijing are capable of building political trust, restarting dialogue and resolving hurdles to Taiwan’s international participation.
He said he hopes that both sides could jointly strive for the well-being of their people and build a peaceful and prosperous Taiwan Strait, engage in mutually beneficial cooperation to facilitate cross-strait integration and advance people’s rights and livelihood to reinvigorate the Zhonghua minzu.
Despite having been colonized by three foreign powers, Taiwanese remain unwavering in their adherence to Chinese culture and its national standpoint, he added.
“Being Taiwanese and being Chinese is not mutually exclusive, and that is the fundamental emotional foundation for the peaceful development of cross-strait ties,” Lien said.
In Taipei, Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chao Tien-lin (趙天麟) pointed to the KMT’s failure to come up with a clear discourse on cross-strait issues, saying that Lien’s comments would “cause the KMT’s road to become narrower.”
Additional reporting by Su Fang-ho and CNA
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS