Minister of education-designate Pan Wen-chung (潘文忠) should set a firm timeline for withdrawing controversial high-school curriculum guidelines, students said yesterday.
About 20 students protested in front of the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) headquarters in Taipei, demanding that the DPP keep its promise to abolish the guidelines.
The allegedly China-centric focus and opaque approval process of last year’s “adjusted” guidelines sparked a student movement that saw the forecourt of the Ministry of Education compound in Taipei occupied by demonstrators.
Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times
“After winning the January elections, the DPP has only stated that it supports the students’ position. It has not promised to absolutely withdraw the guidelines after taking power on May 20,” Taipei Municipal Zhong-lun Senior High School student Lin Chih-yu (林致宇) said, adding that the DPP’s promises were in danger of becoming “feel-good” slogans.
Students said National Taiwan University social work professor Lin Wan-i (林萬億) — a top policy adviser to president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) — had promised them in December last year that the DPP would withdraw the guidelines should it win the elections.
Lin said he was concerned the DPP might backtrack after seeing it shift its position on the cross-strait trade in services agreement and related supervisory articles after January’s elections.
Photo: CNA
The DPP has drawn criticism for draft supervisory legislation that would exempt the trade in services agreement from new approval requirements, a key Sunflower movement demand.
Lin said premier-designate Lin Chuan’s (林全) comments that any decision on the guidelines would be up to Pan were another reason for concern, because Pan had been involved in their drafting in his previous role as administrative vice president of the National Academy for Educational Research.
Minister of Education Wu Se-hwa (吳思華) on Friday said Pan was personally responsible for overseeing the approval of the guidelines, which drew a sharp response from Pan, who said he was forced to relinquish oversight and withdraw from the process after having raised objections regarding procedures and the composition of the drafting committee.
“I was vice president of the National Academy for Educational Research at the time and I was supposed to oversee the development of curricula. However, I was relieved from the role because I was opposed to revisions of high-school curriculum guidelines, as the Ministry of Education did not make the revisions according to legal procedure and those who participated were not qualified to make the changes,” Pan said yesterday. “I was not involved in the process.”
Taiwan Grassroots Education Alliance member Chang Wen-lung (張文隆) said it was critical that Pan make his position clear, because teachers are in the process of choosing textbooks for the upcoming school year, with textbooks based on both the old and new guidelines available.
“If the minister-designate can make a clear statement that the guidelines will be abolished after May 20, it will be easy for teachers to choose,” he said. “As things stand, teachers are vacillating, because the government has not decided.”
In response, the DPP’s Department of Youth Affairs’ Huang Shou-ta (黃守達) said that withdrawing the controversial curriculum guidelines has always been the party’s official stance on the issue, adding that the DPP legislative caucus has proposed amendments to provide a legal framework for future changes to curriculum guidelines.
Last month, 65 DPP legislators proposed a motion demanding that the Executive Yuan and the ministry withdraw the adjustments to curriculum guidelines announced in February 2014.
“The proposal is now being negotiated between parties and could be voted on by Friday next week at the earliest,” he said.
The DPP caucus has also proposed amendments to the Senior High School Education Act (高級中等教育法) and the Primary and Junior High School Act (國民教育法) to make sure that curriculum guidelines will be decided in a professional manner, based on democratic principles and with the participation of the private sector, Huang said.
According to the proposed amendments, the ministry’s curriculum review committee is to be made a permanent organization instead of an ad hoc committee, with government representatives occupying less than one-fourth of seats on the committee, with the remainder filled by non-governmental representatives from educational institutions and groups recommended by the Legislative Yuan, Huang said.
CSBC Corp, Taiwan (台灣國際造船) yesterday released the first video documenting the submerged sea trials of Taiwan’s indigenous defense submarine prototype, the Hai Kun (海鯤), or Narwhal, showing underwater navigation and the launch of countermeasures. The footage shows the vessel’s first dive, steering and control system tests, and the raising and lowering of the periscope and antenna masts. It offered a rare look at the progress in the submarine’s sea acceptance tests. The Hai Kun carried out its first shallow-water diving trial late last month and has since completed four submerged tests, CSBC said. The newly released video compiles images recorded from Jan. 29 to
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) plans to make advanced 3-nanometer chips in Japan, stepping up its semiconductor manufacturing roadmap in the country in a triumph for Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s technology ambitions. TSMC is to adopt cutting-edge technology for its second wafer fab in Kumamoto, company chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) said yesterday. That is an upgrade from an original blueprint to produce 7-nanometer chips by late next year, people familiar with the matter said. TSMC began mass production at its first plant in Japan’s Kumamoto in late 2024. Its second fab, which is still under construction, was originally focused on
DETERRENCE EFFORTS: Washington and partners hope demonstrations of force would convince Beijing that military action against Taiwan would carry high costs The US is considering using HMAS Stirling in Western Australia as a forward base to strengthen its naval posture in a potential conflict with China, particularly over Taiwan, the Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday. As part of its Indo-Pacific strategy, Washington plans to deploy up to four nuclear-powered submarines at Stirling starting in 2027, providing a base near potential hot spots such as Taiwan and the South China Sea. The move also aims to enhance military integration with Pacific allies under the Australia-UK-US trilateral security partnership, the report said. Currently, US submarines operate from Guam, but the island could
RESTRAINTS: Should China’s actions pose any threat to Taiwan’s security, economic or social systems, China would be excluded from major financial institutions, the bill says The US House of Representatives on Monday passed the PROTECT Taiwan Act, which states that Washington would exclude China from participating in major global financial organizations if its actions directly threaten Taiwan’s security. The bill, proposed by Republican Representative Frank Lucas, passed with 395 votes in favor and two against. It stipulates that if China’s actions pose any threat to Taiwan’s security, economic or social systems, the US would, “to the maximum extent practicable,” exclude Beijing from international financial institutions, including the G20, the Bank for International Settlements and the Financial Stability Board. The bill makes it clear that China must be prepared
RSS