A protester holds a flag during a demonstration outside the Ministry of Economic Affairs in Taipei against the Singapore meeting between President Ma Ying-jeou and Chinese President Xi Jinping.
Photo: Reuters
Yesterday’s meeting between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prompted a protest outside the Presidential Office Building, with activists condemning the meeting and pledging to continue the fight against negotiations over the trade in goods agreement with China.
Photo: EPA
“The Ma-Xi meeting demonstrates that ‘one China with different interpretations’ and the [so-called] ‘1992 consensus’ are shattered, made-up constructions,” Economic Democracy Union convener Lai Chung-chiang (賴中強) said.
The “1992 consensus” is a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) in 2006 admitted to making up in 2000, referring to a tacit understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese government that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
“The Ma-Xi meeting, which adhered to the ‘one China’ principle, has definitively wounded the right of Taiwanese to reject possible futures,” Lai said, adding that civic organizations would fight a prospective trade in goods agreement and mutual establishment of representative offices, which Ma said following the meeting that he would push forward.
Photo: Reuters
Both would be opposed by civic groups as tools used by Beijing to further reunification, Lai said.
The protesters marched through downtown Taipei yesterday afternoon, blocking off lanes of traffic and shutting down roads as they weaved along a 3km route from the Ministry of Economic Affairs building and several other government offices before walking down Ketagalan Boulevard to reach the Presidential Office Building.
Before setting off, protesters shouted a series of slogans protesting the meeting and negotiations, telling Ma to “not come back” because they were willing to “give you [him] to Singapore.”
Preparations for the march were initiated several weeks ago by the Economic Democracy Union, which quickly rebranded and expanded it from a prior focus on trade in goods negotiations after the announcement last week of the Ma-Xi meeting.
Most protesters were from the more than 20 civic organizations that co-sponsored the protest, including Taiwan Association for Human Rights, Restoration of Taiwan Social Justice, Taiwan March and Democracy Tautin.
“We are concerned that the meeting will restrict future administrations [to a ‘one China’ framework], but because they will not sign a formal agreement, it is difficult for the Legislative Yuan to exercise its supervisory powers,” Restoration of Taiwan Social Justice’s research department director Lin Jia-yu (林家宇) said.
Protesters carried flags and banners of their organizations, with Taiwan Solidarity Party, New Power Party, Green Party-Social Democratic Party Alliance and Free Taiwan Party representatives bringing up the rear.
After an initial demonstration in front of the Ministry of Economic Affairs building, they wove their way through traffic to put on a short play in front of the Bureau of Foreign Trade office, with actors representing large corporations wearing masks to symbolize what they say is opaque handling of the trade in goods talks.
While negotiations would mainly benefit the paneling, automotive and petrochemical industries controlled by major companies, many small firms would be placed at a disadvantage and the Ma administration has attempted to “mask” this reality by claiming that the talks would include cosmetic facial masks — helping the small firms comprising that industry, protesters said.
The protesters moved to the Council of Agriculture building to protest a rumored opening up of agricultural markets before making their way to the front of the Presidential Office Building, where prominent figures delivered speeches condemning the meeting and the negotiations.
“We refuse to accept any results of the Ma-Xi meeting,” said Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆), a prominent leader of last year’s Sunflower movement.
The Sunflower movement saw the Legislative Yuan surrounded by thousands of protesters for weeks while Lin and other activists occupied the legislature’s main chamber to protest a service trade agreement with China.
“This reflects the consistent thinking of the Ma administration; it did not have sufficient authorization to negotiate the service trade agreement and the lack of sufficient democratic authorization is the most serious problem with the Ma-Xi meeting,” Lin said, adding that Ma had done everything he could to avoid supervision by the Legislative Yuan.
“There is still no consensus on what relationship we should maintain with China or what we imagine our future should look like,” Lin said. “However, Ma has used his identity as a president who is about to step down to frame and limit future cross-strait interactions.”
Even if the meeting did not produce a written agreement, the negotiations to arrange it should still have been subject to legislative approval, Lin said.
BACK IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD: The planned transit by the ‘Baden-Wuerttemberg’ and the ‘Frankfurt am Main’ would be the German Navy’s first passage since 2002 Two German warships are set to pass through the Taiwan Strait in the middle of this month, becoming the first German naval vessels to do so in 22 years, Der Spiegel reported on Saturday. Reuters last month reported that the warships, the frigate Baden-Wuerttemberg and the replenishment ship Frankfurt am Main, were awaiting orders from Berlin to sail the Strait, prompting a rebuke to Germany from Beijing. Der Spiegel cited unspecified sources as saying Beijing would not be formally notified of the German ships’ passage to emphasize that Berlin views the trip as normal. The German Federal Ministry of Defense declined to comment. While
‘UPHOLDING PEACE’: Taiwan’s foreign minister thanked the US Congress for using a ‘creative and effective way’ to deter Chinese military aggression toward the nation The US House of Representatives on Monday passed the Taiwan Conflict Deterrence Act, aimed at deterring Chinese aggression toward Taiwan by threatening to publish information about Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials’ “illicit” financial assets if Beijing were to attack. The act would also “restrict financial services for certain immediate family of such officials,” the text of the legislation says. The bill was introduced in January last year by US representatives French Hill and Brad Sherman. After remarks from several members, it passed unanimously. “If China chooses to attack the free people of Taiwan, [the bill] requires the Treasury secretary to publish the illicit
A senior US military official yesterday warned his Chinese counterpart against Beijing’s “dangerous” moves in the South China Sea during the first talks of their kind between the commanders. Washington and Beijing remain at odds on issues from trade to the status of Taiwan and China’s increasingly assertive approach in disputed maritime regions, but they have sought to re-establish regular military-to-military talks in a bid to prevent flashpoint disputes from spinning out of control. Samuel Paparo, commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command, and Wu Yanan (吳亞男), head of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Southern Theater Command, talked via videoconference. Paparo “underscored the importance
The US House of Representatives yesterday unanimously passed the Taiwan Conflict Deterrence Act, which aims to disincentivize Chinese aggression toward Taiwan by cutting Chinese leaders and their family members off from the US financial system if Beijing acts against Taiwan. The bipartisan bill, which would also publish the assets of top Chinese leaders, was cosponsored by Republican US Representative French Hill, Democratic US Representative Brad Sherman and seven others. If the US president determines that a threat against Taiwan exists, the bill would require the US Department of the Treasury to report to Congress on funds held by certain members of the
RSS