The Chinese government strongly desires that the “one China” principle be made one of the points of “consensus” to be announced after a historic meeting between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore today.
However, Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) officials said that they would prefer the meeting to be based on the so-called “1992 consensus.”
As of press time last night, the two sides were still negotiating the issue.
Photo: Hu Shun-hsiang, Taipei Times
The “1992 consensus,” a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted making up in 2000, refers to a tacit understanding between the KMT and the Chinese government that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
The meeting is the first of its kind since the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lost the Chinese Civil War in 1949 and retreated to Taiwan and its outlying islands.
Ma said the meeting with Xi would not result in any accords, or promises to sign accords of any sort, nor a joint declaration, adding that a press conference would be held after the meeting to highlight the points on which both sides had reached a consensus.
Despite the MAC’s wish to make the so-called “1992 consensus” a point to be mentioned, a poll it conducted last month showed that only 1.3 percent of 1,087 respondents supported making the “1992 consensus” one of the issues to be talked about by the heads of state.
MAC Minister Andrew Hsia (夏立言) said that details were still being hashed out and whether the “one China” principle would make it onto the list of points of consensus would be made known today.
Hsia arrived in Singapore on Thursday and praised the facilities at the Shangri-La Hotel after inspecting the location where the meeting is to take place, adding that he would be conducting a final check today.
Hsia said that the meeting would be on equal terms and there would be no issue of Taiwan being the lesser partner in any way.
Hsia said Xi would not be attending the post-meeting press conference as it was the Chinese custom, as could be seen from Taiwan Affairs Office Minister Zhang Zhijun’s (張志軍) absence from previous post-meeting press conferences.
Meanwhile, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chinese Affairs Division director Chao Tien-lin (趙天麟) said that he hoped Ma would uphold Taiwan’s dignity.
Chao said Taiwanese are not against cross-strait interaction, but such interaction must be based on the prerequisites of dignity, transparency and non-political motives.
That is the basic stance of the DPP on cross-strait interaction, seeing as how democracy and the public will are the key supports on which cross-strait interaction rests, Chao said.
Democratic procedures and ample negotiation with the public on the intentions of a meeting would to a great extent assuage public anxiety, Chao said.
Cross-strait relations should no longer be considered on the basis of benefiting a particular party or the manipulation of elections, Chao said.
The DPP hopes that Ma will be able to uphold these three tenets and not sacrifice Taiwan’s sovereignty, Chao said.
Chao said that while the DPP is not inclined to plan any rallies or protests against the meeting, public will in a democratic society has its own way of manifesting opposition.
Additional reporting by CNA
Taipei on Friday rejected Hanoi’s characterization of its recent live-fire drill near Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) as “illegal,” saying that Taiwan’s claim to the small island in the South China Sea was “unquestionable.” The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) said in a statement that the comments made by its Vietnamese counterpart about the military’s routine live-fire drills near Itu Aba on Tuesday were “unacceptable.” Earlier on Friday, Vietnamese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Le Thi Thu Hang called Taiwan’s military activity “a serious violation of Vietnam’s territorial sovereignty,” saying it had caused tensions and complicated the situation in the region. Hang
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday said it is more than doubling its US investment to US$40 billion as it plans to make 3-nanometer chips in 2026 at a second Arizona fab, adding to the chipmaker’s original plan of building a US$12 billion fab to make 4-nanometer chips in 2024. The investment would mark the largest foreign direct investment in Arizona’s history and one of the largest foreign direct investments in the history of the US, the world’s largest contract chipmaker said in a statement yesterday. In addition to the more than 10,000 construction workers at the site, TSMC’s two fabs
ENHANCEMENT: The sale would update Taiwan’s Patriot missile system to improve its missile defensive capability and deter threats, the US Department of State said The US has proposed selling Taiwan as many as 100 of its most advanced Patriot air-defense missiles along with radar and support equipment in a deal valued at US$882 million, according to a US Department of State notice obtained by Bloomberg News. The proposal was made under the provisions of a 2010 sale and so technically is not new. It is classified as an enhancement to the earlier deal, with a potential total value of US$2.81 billion. The upgrade would not change the overall value of that deal, which infuriated Beijing at the time and led it to halt planned military exchanges
‘UNITED FRONT’ TOOL? There are already many accounts on Douyin impersonating government agencies, and even Premier Su Tseng-chang, DPP Legislator Mark Ho said Lawmakers and a number of experts yesterday called on the government to ban or heavily regulate Douyin (抖音) over concerns that the short-video platform could be used by China to spread disinformation. Owned by ByteDance Ltd (字節跳動), Douyin and its international version, TikTok, are a subject of concern in democracies worldwide because of potential manipulation by the Chinese government. FBI Director Chris Wray on Friday said that Beijing might have the ability to control TikTok’s recommendation algorithm, “which allows them to manipulate content, and if they want to, to use it for influence operations.” TikTok could also be used to collect personal data