Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presumptive presidential nominee Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) said her “one China, same interpretation” formula aims to have China recognize the existence of “the government of the Republic of China [ROC], not the existence of the ROC, otherwise it would become a ‘two-state theory.’”
Hung was interviewed on a TV talk show late on Thursday in which the host questioned her about the implications of her “one China, same interpretation” cross-strait proposal that calls for China to recognize the ROC.
“If we want China to recognize the ROC, but at the same time it is impossible for them to deny the People’s Republic of China [PRC], wouldn’t that be suggesting there are two Chinas?” the host asked.
“You have completely misunderstood [my policy],” Hung said. “It is the existence of the ROC government [that we want Beijing to recognize]. And we would also recognize the existence of the PRC government.”
“We have overlapping sovereignty claims, but are two separate governing bodies. The logic is clear and simple,” Hung said. “Taiwanese independence, if possible, would be good as well, but it is simply not possible. Changing the Constitution would incur strong opposition from both [China] and the US.”
Regarding the difficulty of obtaining the recognition of the ROC government by the PRC, which the host said had not been achieved so many years after the efforts of late Straits Exchange Foundation chairman Koo Chen-fu (辜振甫), Hung said that it should not be given up just because it is hard.
“After so many interactions and signed agreements, the fact we have still failed to achieve what we want shows there still is a lack of mutual trust between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait,” she said. “It shows that we have come to face a bottleneck in the structure built up based on the ‘1992 consensus,’ and it should be eased.”
“However, we would not say the step [of easing the bottleneck] should not be taken simply because it is difficult,” Hung said.
In response to media queries after the interview, Hung said that although the sovereignty claims of the two governments overlap, “I cannot [ask the PRC to recognize] the existence of the ROC, as that entails the [simultaneous existence] of the PRC and the ROC, which would become a ‘two-state theory.’”
Separately, during an interview with Chinese Television System aired on Thursday night and last night, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) endorsed Hung’s “one China, same interpretation” formula, which he said was “almost the same as my proposal.”
The “one China, same interpretation” proposal did not go beyond “one China, different interpretations,” known as the so-called “1992 consensus,” Ma said, referring to a supposed tacit understanding between the KMT and Beijing that both sides agree there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
“The ‘one China, same interpretation’ proposal adheres to the ‘one China’ principle and she interprets China as the ROC, as I do,” he said.
After Hung’s “one China, same interpretation” was put forward, the US did not send its representative to meet with Hung like some other countries did, Ma said.
“That meant that [the US] is not worried about her policy,” Ma said.
Ma is expected to meet with some US officials, lawmakers and academics during transit stops in Boston and Los Angeles on his way to visit three of the nation’s allies in Central America and the Caribbean, which starts on Saturday next week.
“I will explain [Hung’s policy] to the US should they ask me about it,” Ma said.
Ma said that after he returns to Taiwan on July 18, he would attend the KMT’s national congress, which is expected to confirm Hung’s nomination.
“I don’t see any possibility that her nomination would fail to pass the national congress,” Ma said.
The US Department of State yesterday criticized Beijing over its misrepresentation of the US’ “one China” policy in the latest diplomatic salvo between the two countries over a bid by Taiwan to regain its observer status at the World Health Assembly, the decisionmaking body of the WHO. “The PRC [People’s Republic of China] continues to publicly misrepresent U.S. policy,” Department of State spokesman Ned Price wrote on Twitter. “The United States does not subscribe to the PRC’s ‘one China principle’ — we remain committed to our longstanding, bipartisan one China policy, guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, Three Joint Communiques, and
FATES LINKED: The US president said that sanctions on Russia over Ukraine must exact a ‘long-term price,’ because otherwise ‘what signal does that send to China?’ US President Joe Biden yesterday vowed that US forces would defend Taiwan militarily in the event of a Chinese attack in his strongest statement to date on the issue. Beijing is already “flirting with danger,” Biden said following talks with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Tokyo, in which the pair agreed to monitor Chinese naval activity and joint Chinese-Russian exercises. Asked if Washington was willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan, he replied: “Yes.” “That’s the commitment we made,” Biden said. “We agreed with the ‘one China’ policy, we signed on to it ... but the idea that it can be
INFORMATION LEAKED: Documents from Xinjiang purportedly showed top leaders in Beijing calling for a forceful crackdown and even orders to shoot to kill Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) yesterday held a videoconference with UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet as she visited Xinjiang during a mission overshadowed by fresh allegations of Uighur abuses and fears she is being used as a public relations tool. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been accused of detaining more than 1 million Uighurs and other Muslim minorities in the region as part of a years-long crackdown the US and lawmakers in other Western nations have labeled a “genocide.” China denies the allegations. Bachelet was expected to visit the cities of Urumqi and Kashgar on a six-day tour. The US
SUBTLE? While Biden said the US policy of ‘strategic ambiguity’ on Taiwan had not changed, the group targeted China and Russia without naming them Leaders of Australia, India, Japan and the US yesterday warned against attempts to “change the status quo by force,” as concerns grow about whether China could invade Taiwan. The issue of Taiwan loomed over a leadership meeting in Tokyo of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) nations — the US, Japan, Australia and India — who stressed their determination to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific region in the face of an increasingly assertive China, although Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said the group was not targeting any one country. The four leaders said in a joint statement issued after their talks
RSS