Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu’s (朱立倫) description of cross-strait relations as two sides “belonging to one China” risked leading to a “misunderstanding” that Taiwan belongs to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Mainland Affairs Council Minister Andrew Hsia (夏立言) said in Taipei yesterday.
There is a subtle difference between that description and the so-called “1992 consensus” adopted by the government, under which both sides of the Taiwan Strait recognize that there is ‘“one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means, Hsia told a meeting of the legislature’s Internal Administration Committee in Taipei.
The government has tried to avoid using the language Chu used because of political sensitivities and has opposed the formula whenever the Chinese mention it, Hsia said.
Photo: Chien Jung-fong, Taipei Times
“We consider it unacceptable. That position remains unchanged,” he said. “We would not choose to use of words he [Chu] did.”
However, Hsia commended Chu’s characterization of the “1992 consensus,” saying that Chu intended to highlight the importance of the consensus — although he used a different way to express it.
“If the ‘one China’ he [Chu] meant was the Republic of China [ROC], as he said it was, of course I am not opposed to the idea,” Hsia said.
Hsia was invited to the meeting to take legislators’ questions over Chu’s just-concluded trip to China, where he met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and attended the 10th Cross-Strait Economic, Trade and Culture Forum cohosted by the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Chu’s statement that “both sides [of the Taiwan Strait] belong to ‘one China,’ with differences in connotations and definitions [of ‘one China’]” was at the center of the sometimes heated debate.
Hsia did not voice his opinion about Chu’s definition of the “1992 consensus” until he was grilled by legislators from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the Taiwan Solidarity Union and the People First Party — one after another — about whether the government had shifted its position from the “1992 consensus,” or what it said was “one China, with each side having its own interpretation of what ‘China’ means” to “both sides belonging to ‘one China.’”
In the beginning, Hsia said the phrasing of “both sides belonging to ‘one China,’” was similar to the “1992 consensus” of “one China, with each side having its own interpretation of what ‘China’ means.”
Hsia said Chu was the first person in the ROC to describe cross-strait relations as being “two sides belonging to one China,” a term coined by Beijing and commonly used by Chinese officials — most recently by Xi in March.
He was then corrected by DPP Legislator Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋), who said former KMT chairmen Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) and Lien Chan (連戰) had both proposed the idea before.
The statement made by former Mainland Affairs Council minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) in March 2013, in response to then-Chinese vice premier Li Keqiang (李克強), who said both sides belong to “one China,” that the characterization was “unacceptable” remains valid, Hsia said.
Three cases of Candida auris, a fungus that can cause a yeast infection known as candidiasis in humans, have been reported in Taiwan over the past few years, but they did not display drug resistance, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Deputy Director-General Philip Lo (羅一鈞) said yesterday. Lo made the statement at a news conference in Taipei, one day after the Washington Post reported that the potentially deadly fungus is spreading in US hospitals. The fungus was first discovered in Japan in 2009 and poses a danger to immunocompromised people, with an estimated mortality rate of 30 to 60 percent, Lo
‘DIRE’: Taiwan would not engage in ‘dollar diplomacy,’ the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said, after China reportedly offered Honduras up to US$3 billion to establish relations The government yesterday recalled its ambassador to Honduras after the Central American nation sent its foreign minister to China, signaling that it would sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Suspicions concerning ties with Honduras are rife after Honduran President Xiomara Castro on Tuesday last week wrote on Twitter that her country would pursue diplomatic ties with China. Honduran Minister of Foreign Affairs Eduardo Enrique Reina traveled to China on Wednesday “to promote efforts for the establishment of diplomatic relations” on instructions from Castro, Reuters yesterday quoted Honduran presidential spokesman Ivis Alvarado as saying. The government “has decided to immediately recall the ambassador to Honduras
SWITCH TO BEIJING: The government severed diplomatic relations about an hour after Honduras announced the move, saying that no semi-official ties would be maintained Taiwan severed diplomatic ties with Honduras and ended all cooperation with the Central American country, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said yesterday, about an hour and a half after the Honduran Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced on Twitter at 8am Taiwan time that the nation would cut its ties with Taiwan. Honduran President Xiomara Castro on Wednesday sent Honduran Minister of Foreign Affairs Eduardo Enrique Reina to Beijing to negotiate the establishment of diplomatic relations. She announced the plan on March 14 on Twitter. “To safeguard Taiwan’s sovereignty and dignity, Taiwan is terminating diplomatic ties with Honduras with immediate effect” after communication with
MEDIA, SOCIETY FOCUS: Doublethink Lab said that Beijing is trying to coerce countries that rely on China economically to pursue policies in its favor China has stronger influence over Taiwan’s media and society than any other country, the Taipei-based Doublethink Lab think tank said yesterday, as it announced its China Index gauging Beijing’s global influence. Taiwan ranked 11th overall among 82 countries assessed, but first in terms of social and media influence, Doublethink Lab chairman Puma Shen (沈伯洋) told a news conference in Taipei. More than 200 experts and academics participated in the project, including some highly influential figures, Shen said. The index collects information from countries worldwide to gauge China’s influence and assess how Chinese policies affect them, Shen said. In terms of Chinese