The Special Investigation Division (SID) of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office’s subpoena of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Secretary-General Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) could be illegal and politically motivated, the DPP said yesterday.
“Wu was listed as an ‘interested party’ in a recent subpoena from the SID... on which no details of the case were listed. The division appears to have violated the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法),” DPP spokesperson Huang Di-ying (黃帝穎) told a press conference.
According to the code, the SID should have listed the origin of the case and the identity of the subpoenaed — be it a witness or a defendant, Huang said, adding that “interested party” was not an identity as regulated by the code, which means that the subpoena could be illegal.
Photo: Chien Jung-fong, Taipei Times
The DPP also suspected that there is a hidden agenda behind the investigation and the subpoena because the SID “is notorious for its interference in several high-profile political cases in recent years,” the spokesperson said.
That is why the division has earned the nickname “the investigation division with special motives,” he added.
“That is also why we cannot help but wonder whether there is any political agenda behind Wu’s subpoena, as the division chose to launch an investigation into a high-ranking official of the opposition party in the run-up to the seven-in-one elections in November,” Huang said.
DPP spokesperson Hsu Chia-ching (徐佳青) said Wu would discuss the matter with the party and his lawyers before deciding whether to report to the SID.
With regards to claims of a planned purge targeting high-ranking DPP officials, Hsu said the party preferred not to speculate or over-analyze the case at the moment, but the division’s past investigations against opposition politicians and the fact that the subpoena was issued on June 26, about a month after DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) assumed the part post, did not give the party any reason for optimism.
“Many DPP members have been able to survive judicial oppression, but their innocence was proven only after years of court appearances and trials. We hope nothing like this will happen before the year-end elections and the presidential election in 2016,” Hsu said.
In response, the SID denied that there were any political considerations involved in the investigation, the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper), reported.
The SID said the ongoing case in which Wu is involved is related to a violation of the Classified National Security Information Protection Act (國家機密保護法), but that the division could not go into details.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) spokesperson Charles Chen (陳以信) said the DPP had made allegations against the KMT and the judiciary without any solid evidence.
“The accusation itself is a cheap political maneuver orchestrated by the DPP,” Chen said.
The rumor that the KMT is trying to “annihilate” Tsai with the judicial investigation is a DPP smear campaign, which shows that the party wants to achieve its political goals even at the cost of losing public trust in the judicial system, the spokesperson said.
Nvidia Corp yesterday unveiled its new high-speed interconnect technology, NVLink Fusion, with Taiwanese application-specific IC (ASIC) designers Alchip Technologies Ltd (世芯) and MediaTek Inc (聯發科) among the first to adopt the technology to help build semi-custom artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure for hyperscalers. Nvidia has opened its technology to outside users, as hyperscalers and cloud service providers are building their own cost-effective AI chips, or accelerators, used in AI servers by leveraging ASIC firms’ designing capabilities to reduce their dependence on Nvidia. Previously, NVLink technology was only available for Nvidia’s own AI platform. “NVLink Fusion opens Nvidia’s AI platform and rich ecosystem for
‘WORLD’S LOSS’: Taiwan’s exclusion robs the world of the benefits it could get from one of the foremost practitioners of disease prevention and public health, Minister Chiu said Taiwan should be allowed to join the World Health Assembly (WHA) as an irreplaceable contributor to global health and disease prevention efforts, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said yesterday. He made the comment at a news conference in Taipei, hours before a Taiwanese delegation was to depart for Geneva, Switzerland, seeking to meet with foreign representatives for a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the WHA, the WHO’s annual decisionmaking meeting, which would be held from Monday next week to May 27. As of yesterday, Taiwan had yet to receive an invitation. Taiwan has much to offer to the international community’s
CAUSE AND EFFECT: China’s policies prompted the US to increase its presence in the Indo-Pacific, and Beijing should consider if this outcome is in its best interests, Lai said China has been escalating its military and political pressure on Taiwan for many years, but should reflect on this strategy and think about what is really in its best interest, President William Lai (賴清德) said. Lai made the remark in a YouTube interview with Mindi World News that was broadcast on Saturday, ahead of the first anniversary of his presidential inauguration tomorrow. The US has clearly stated that China is its biggest challenge and threat, with US President Donald Trump and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth repeatedly saying that the US should increase its forces in the Indo-Pacific region
ALL TOGETHER: Only by including Taiwan can the WHA fully exemplify its commitment to ‘One World for Health,’ the representative offices of eight nations in Taiwan said The representative offices in Taiwan of eight nations yesterday issued a joint statement reiterating their support for Taiwan’s meaningful engagement with the WHO and for Taipei’s participation as an observer at the World Health Assembly (WHA). The joint statement came as Taiwan has not received an invitation to this year’s WHA, which started yesterday and runs until Tuesday next week. This year’s meeting of the decisionmaking body of the WHO in Geneva, Switzerland, would be the ninth consecutive year Taiwan has been excluded. The eight offices, which reaffirmed their support for Taiwan, are the British Office Taipei, the Australian Office Taipei, the