The Sunflower movement against the government’s handling of the cross-strait service trade agreement has minimized the potential for Taiwan to achieve political breakthroughs with China before President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leaves office in 2016, a new US Congressional report said.
“The protests also appear to have called into question the political viability of Ma’s approach to cross-strait relations and the fate of the services trade agreement will be a test of that approach’s sustainability,” the report written by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission said.
The report’s release came as Center for Strategic and International Studies senior associate Joseph Bosco wrote in the National Interest that the Sunflower protests made it clear that the prospect of the nation’s peaceful unification with China under Beijing’s present administration will never be acceptable to Taiwanese.
“Strategic thinkers in Beijing need to return to the drawing board on China’s long-term relationship with Taiwan,” wrote Bosco, who served as the country desk officer for China at the Pentagon.
The Congressional report said that Taiwan’s local elections in November, and its legislative and presidential elections in 2016 could also slow down or limit advances in cross-strait economic pacts and other cooperation agreements.
“Building on recent progress on cross-strait cooperation could become less important for Ma as he focuses on domestic priorities, including improving the economy and positioning the [Chinese Nationalist Party] KMT for success,” the report said.
“Cross-strait dialogue on political issues also is unlikely to take place during the remainder of Ma’s term,” the report said.
“Political talks with Beijing are a sensitive issue for the Taiwan public, because of concern that such talks might move the sides closer to unification. According to the most recent survey of attitudes in Taiwan regarding cross-strait political relations, the vast majority of the Taiwan people supported maintaining the status quo,” it added.
Bosco wrote that the US’ “policy vagueness” on how it would react if China attacks Taiwan has encouraged Beijing to build an arsenal of attack submarines and anti-ship ballistic missiles to deter Washington from intervening on Taipei’s behalf.
“If and when an attack on Taiwan occurs, Congress will not allow this or a future administration to equivocate and it is better for China to understand that now rather than later,” he wrote.
Bosco said US President Barack Obama can eliminate this “dangerous” ambiguity by finally moving ahead with Washington’s stalled submarine provision program for Taiwan and by selling it the advanced F-16s it needs to bolster its self-defense capabilities.
“Those actions would meet the letter and spirit of the venerable Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) and help ensure the regional peace and stability it was intended to serve,” he concluded.
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said yesterday that China using armed force against Taiwan could constitute a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, allowing the country to mobilize the Japanese armed forces under its security laws. Takaichi made the remarks during a parliamentary session yesterday while responding to a question about whether a "Taiwan contingency" involving a Chinese naval blockade would qualify as a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, according to a report by Japan’s Asahi Shimbun. "If warships are used and other armed actions are involved, I believe this could constitute a survival- threatening
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS