The political deadlock between students occupying the Legislative Yuan and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is unlikely to end soon, because Ma is not willing to concede and has been evading the students’ demands, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) officials said yesterday.
“When students demanded the organization of a citizens’ constitutional conference, Ma said he would convene a national trade conference instead. Knowing Ma, that was the kind of thing he always did — evading the core issue and shifting the focus to something else,” DPP Policy Research Committee executive director Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) said.
“Getting right to the point is not Ma’s style,” Wu said.
Photo: Chien Jung-fong, Taipei Times
While the DPP supports the causes and demands of the Sunflower movement — which has captured the country’s attention since the students stormed and occupied the legislative floor on March 18, and asked the government to withdraw and renegotiate the controversial deal amid concern it would severely undermine Taiwan’s economy — the party currently has no plan to intervene in the movement, Wu said.
The DPP has been playing a supporting role in the movement and has no plan to change that, Wu said.
Department of International Affairs director Liu Shih-chung (劉世忠) said the biggest concern now is that Ma has no exit strategy and does not appear to plan one.
Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times
“It seems like he would keep on playing the China card, trying to reassure people that everything would be fine after the trade pact takes effect,” Liu said.
“However, for some people, their worst fear is not how Ma would deal with pressure from China, but that the president has already established some sort of collaborative partnership with Beijing,” he added.
One of Ma’s biggest mistakes in the controversy is that he is still convinced that Taiwanese believe that economics and politics can be separated in dealing with cross-strait issues, Liu said.
That may have been the case before, but the ongoing mass protest shows that the public has come to realize that the service trade agreement would have greater political than economic implications, Liu said.
The DPP’s counterproposal to the service trade agreement has been relatively underreported since the student movement became the center of attention two weeks ago, DPP Department of China Affairs director Honigmann Hong (洪財隆) said.
After a comprehensive review and discussion with its think tank, the party recommended that at least 24 items on the trade agreement’s sector-specific commitment list — including banking, printing and publishing, and Type II telecommunications — should be reconsidered, he said.
Hong added that the DPP has never opposed free trade and signing free-trade agreements with other countries, but pursuing trade liberalization with China — which has not ruled out annexing Taiwan by force if necessary — requires greater scrutiny and transparency.
SOLIDARITY: A group of European lawmakers condemned China’s aggressive moves, while the foreign minister of Lithuania said Taiwan ‘cannot become a second Ukraine’ A German parliamentary delegation would visit Taiwan in the first week of October, German lawmaker Holger Becker on Monday told visiting Democratic Progressive Party legislators Fan Yun (范雲) and Lin I-chin (林宜瑾) at the Bundestag in Berlin. Asked by Fan whether he is worried about possible reprisals from Beijing, such as banning him and his family from entering China, Becker said he is more interested in visiting Taiwan, as “now is the time for democracies to stand together.” Fan and Lin also met with German officials to exchange views on digital education and governance. Investing in digital infrastructure and protecting equal rights to
As China waged extensive military exercises off Taiwan, a group of US defense experts in Washington was focused on their own simulation of an eventual — but for now entirely hypothetical — US-China war over the nation. The unofficial what-if game is being conducted on the fifth floor of an office building not far from the White House, and it posits a US military response to a Chinese invasion in 2026. Even though the participants bring a US perspective, they are finding that a US-Taiwan victory, if there is one, could come at a huge cost. “The results are showing that under
‘SIMULATED ATTACKS’: Ten warships each from China and Taiwan were maneuvering at close quarters in the Taiwan Strait, with some Chinese vessels crossing the median line Taiwan yesterday reiterated that it would not succumb to pressure from Beijing after China carried out its most provocative military drills in decades in retaliation for US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s trip to Taiwan last week. “We will never bow to pressure. We uphold freedom and democracy, and believe Taiwanese disapprove [of] China’s bullying actions with force and saber rattling at our door,” Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) said yesterday. China had “arrogantly” disrupted regional peace and stability, he said, calling on Beijing to not flex its military muscles. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has also called on the international community to “support
DRILLS CONTINUE: China’s creation of a restricted zone across the median line of the Taiwan Strait challenges a 70-year-old fact, a ministry of defense official said The nation’s military fully complies with international rules and guidelines when responding to Chinese military drills, the Ministry of National Defense said yesterday, vowing to continue defending Taiwan in accordance with international law. China on Thursday launched four days of military drills around Taiwan proper in response to US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taipei. The drills were expected to end on Sunday, but neither Beijing nor Taipei confirmed their conclusion, although the Ministry of Transportation and Communications said it had seen some evidence suggesting at least a partial drawdown. However, China yesterday said the drills would continue, saying “the