Hundreds of thousands of “black-clad army” members took to the streets in Taipei yesterday, wearing black to symbolize what they call the government’s “black-box,” or opaque, handling of the cross-strait service trade pact as they called for the agreement to be retracted and Taiwan’s democracy to be safeguarded.
The demonstrators also wore yellow ribbons that read: “Oppose the service pact, save Taiwan” and chanted slogans such as “Protect our democracy, withdraw the trade deal” as they carried sunflowers, which became a symbol of opposition to the trade deal after the media dubbed the student-led protests the “Sunflower student movement.”
At 2pm yesterday, an hour after the demonstration’s scheduled start time, police estimated that 61,100 people had joined the rally, but “since the police’s number is always an underestimate, we are saying that there are now more than 350,000 people at the scene,” an announcer on the protest’s main stage said.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
By 4pm, as the number of protesters continued to climb, there was no room left on Ketagalan Boulevard, Chungshan S Road and Qingdao E Road, and latecomers had to join the demonstrators spilling out onto Xinyi Road, Zhongxiao W Road and Liberty Square.
The crowd was such that the National Taiwan University Hospital MRT Station was forced to let trains pass without stopping.
At 5pm, the coalition of student and civic groups behind the demonstration said that approximately 500,000 people had come out to stand for their cause yesterday, while the National Police Agency put the number of demonstrators at 116,000 at the rally’s peak at about 4pm and 101,900 an hour later.
Police erected steel barricades to prevent protesters from reaching major government buildings, including the Presidential Office Building and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Yesterday’s rally follows the ongoing student-led sit-in at the Legislative Yuan that began on March 18 and the occupation of the Executive Yuan complex in Taipei on March 23 by other protesters who were forcefully evicted by police the next day.
Before the mass rally began, student protesters issued a press release saying that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) had “continued to deceive the people and fudge the facts” at a press conference on Saturday.
Photo: Toby Chang, Reuters
“With everyone hoping the president would respond positively to the protesters’ appeals, Ma again let us down. The president — despite having an extremely low approving rating — again chose to ignore poll results showing that more than 70 percent of respondents want the pact subjected to a clause-by-clause review ‘in substantial terms,’” the statement said.
The students said the remarks Ma made on Saturday were no different than what Premier Jiang Yi-hua (江宜樺) said a few days earlier, “which was to rewind the situation back to the day before the 30-second ramming through of the pact at the controversial legislative committee meeting on March 17.”
The students were referring to a March 17 committee review session convened by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chang Ching-chung (張慶忠) at which Chang announced that the trade deal had passed its review and would go to the legislative floor, drawing furious criticism from opposition lawmakers and helping spark the protests.
Without the institutionalization of a mechanism to oversee cross-strait negotiations and agreements, the 30-second travesty can be repeated, the students’ statement added.
“Ma can still bypass the supervision of the legislature by issuing an executive order. He can still use party discipline and trade favors to force the KMT legislators into submission and pass the pact,” they said. “From the 318 Occupation [of the Legislative Yuan] to the 330 Demonstration [yesterday’s protest], civic consciousness has been rising in Taiwan. More than 50 civic groups are coming out today to form a ‘citizen’s constitutional boulevard,’ with each member to establish a speakers’ corner to discuss issues pertaining to democracy, freedom of speech, healthcare, social welfare, vulnerable groups, labor rights, environment protection or land/residential justice.”
On Ketagalan Boulevard, against the backdrop of a banner reading: “Protect our democracy, withdraw the trade deal,” various student, civic and labor group representatives, as well as lawyers, professors, academics and movie directors, delivered talks on the main stage of the rally from 1pm until the end.
Academia Sinica assistant researcher Peng Jen-Yu (彭仁郁) said she represented about 120 colleagues who have signed a letter voicing their dissent to what they feel is the government’s opaque handling of the pact with China and the violent police crackdown against student protesters at the Executive Yuan on Monday morning.
Also at yesterday’s event was Freddy Lim (林昶佐), the vocalist of Chthonic (閃靈), a black-metal rock band, and Amnesty International Taiwan chairman, who said that state violence against demonstrators cannot be tolerated.
As a musician, Lim pointed to the danger the local entertainment industry faces if the pact is implemented.
“Do you expect artworks and their creators to be free of the Chinese government’s censorship when you invest in performance venues over there [in China]? With investors pouring funds into in both Chinese and Taiwanese performance venues, artists who are censored or refused by Beijing may not perform in Taiwan out of pure economic consideration,” he said.
National Taiwan University professor Yen Chueh-an (顏厥安) told the crowd that “in a democratic country, we do not overthrow a government that we dislike, we change it.”
“However, the challenge we are now facing is a crisis of constitutionalism, which means that we cannot throw disqualified officials out of office or alter the policies that we abhor,” Yen said, before joking that since “it would be too tiring if we have to storm into Legislative Yuan all the time,” Taiwan needs “a long-term solution, which is the citizens’ constitutional conference.”
Academia Sinica research fellow Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) said Ma was being intentionally ambiguous in the wording he used at the press conference on Saturday, “misleading the media into believing — contrary to the truth — that he has agreed to three of the students’ four requests.”
He then called on KMT lawmakers to stand with the public rather than the “9 percent president.”
Saying that Ma “keeps hitting a straw man and misguiding the public with questionable information,” student protest leader Chen Wei-ting (陳為廷) asked the president to “face up to the problem.”
Chen added that Ma was insincere in expressing his concerns about Taiwan’s future, since at the same time, he was “obstructing Taiwanese’s concrete participation” in their political system and accused the president of worrying only about his promises to and agreements with Beijing.
“He [Ma] said that renegotiating the pact would hurt [Taiwan’s] credibility, but what he did not say is that there are plenty of examples of such agreements being renegotiated after being reviewed by the signatory countries’ legislative bodies, such as the free-trade agreement between South Korea and the US,” Chen said.
In the closing remarks at the rally, student protest leader Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆) said the public has penned a remarkable page in the nation’s history, “not because we occupied the Legislative Yuan, but because through our actions, Taiwan’s institutions are being widely discussed and scrutinized.”
“We are the ones who should determine Taiwan’s future,” he said. “Taiwanese are the commander-in-chiefs of this country, whose orders the president should listen to and follow.”
Lin reiterated the protesters] demandd of the Ma administration: First, the drafting of “legislation overseeing cross-strait agreements” and then the “review of the cross-strait service trade pact.”
He added that the legislative sit-in will not end because the government fails to answer their demands.
After Lin spoke, the demonstrators chanted slogans such as “President Ma, please listen to the people,” before ending the rally peacefully, with the crowd starting to disperse at about 7:30pm.
Additional reporting by agencies
‘A DISASTER’: A successful Chinese attack on Taiwan would undermine the credibility of US security guarantees and could result in a global depression, three experts wrote A Chinese takeover of Taiwan would be a geopolitical catastrophe for the US and its allies, one that would overshadow almost all others over the next decade, US policy experts said. Andrew Erickson, a professor of strategy in the US Naval War College’s China Maritime Studies Institute; Gabriel Collins, a fellow at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy; and former US deputy national security adviser Matthew Pottinger issued the warning in an article published on Tuesday in Foreign Affairs. Bejing’s invasion or annexation of Taiwan “would be a disaster of utmost importance to the United States, and I am convinced that
Taiwanese businesspeople’s investments in China last year hit a record low of 11.4 percent of total foreign investment, the Mainland Affairs Council said yesterday. The number was a huge decline from 83.8 percent in 2010, mainly because Taiwanese businesspeople have been diversifying their investments globally over the past few years, with great success, the council said. From 1991 to last year, 45,523 Taiwanese investments in China totaling US$206.37 billion had been approved, accounting for 50.7 percent of overall foreign investment, data from the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Investment Commission showed. The amount and proportion of Taiwanese investments in China has been declining, with
Taiwanese tourists on board a Kinmen cruise ship had a scare yesterday when it was intercepted by Chinese coast guards who forcefully boarded the vessel to inspect it. The Sunrise, a tourism ferry that operates between Kinmen and Xiamen, China, was sailing around the waters around the islets of Dadan (大膽) and Erdan (二膽) — both of which are part of Kinmen County — yesterday afternoon when it encountered personnel from China’s Fujian Coast Guard Bureau. China Coast Guard personnel forced their way on board and conducted an inspection for about 30 minutes before leaving, local media cited the tourists as saying. The
CHINA’S VERSION: The TAO threatened Taiwan and denied the existence of restricted waters around Kinmen County after two Chinese died fleeing the Taiwanese coast guard Taiwan would continue to enforce the law in restricted waters around Kinmen County, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. The council was responding after China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) spokeswoman Zhu Fenglian (朱鳳蓮) on Saturday rejected the existence of restricted waters around Kinmen County — a group of Taiwanese islands close to China’s coast — and said that Beijing reserves the right to take further measures after two Chinese died in the area. The two died on Wednesday after the speedboat they were in capsized while they were being pursued by Taiwanese Coast Guard Administration (CGA) officials. The speedboat had entered