Not a single article in the cross-strait service trade agreement was reviewed on the first day of the legislative review of the pact yesterday, as the meeting was marked by chaos, conflict and a standoff between the pan-green and the pan-blue camps.
Although the meeting was scheduled to begin at 9am yesterday morning, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators had camped out in the meeting room since Tuesday night, hoping to speak early in the review.
The first wave of clashes broke out at about 8am when clerks calling out legislators’ names on a sign-up sheet called DPP Legislator Ho Hsin-chun’s (何欣純) name, but Ho did not reply. DPP legislators Su Chen-ching (蘇震清) and Tuan Yi-kang (段宜康) got into a fight — first verbally and later physically — with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lin Te-fu (林德福) over whether Ho should be skipped.
Photo: Wang Min-wei, Taipei Times
At the same time, KMT Legislator Yang Chiung-ying (楊瓊瓔) and DPP Legislator Yeh Yi-jin (葉宜津) jumped onto a table and began a verbal conflict.
Amid the chaos, KMT Legislator Chang Ching-chung (張慶忠) took the sign-up sheet and walked out of the meeting room. DPP Legislator Chen Ting-fei (陳亭妃) ran after him, stopping him in front of an elevator.
As the two pushed and shoved, Chang threw a bag with the sheet inside toward KMT Legislator Lin Tsang-min (林滄敏), but it landed on the head of a TV reporter.
Before anyone could work out what was happening, the bag was taken away by an unknown person.
“KMT legislators, please bring back the sign-up sheet, this is not how you should boycott a meeting in a democracy,” DPP Legislator Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) said.
KMT legislators Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) and Chiang Hui-chen (江惠貞) accused DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁), who presided over the meeting, of allowing DPP lawmakers to sign up to speak before announcing the start of the meeting. Chen Chi-mai denied the accusation.
Since the meeting could not proceed without the sign-up sheet, the two camps remained in a standoff, randomly yelling at each other using loudspeakers, until the lunch break was called at noon.
The situation did not improve when the meeting resumed at 2:36pm.
“I hereby announce that the meeting has resumed and I would like to invite Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi [王郁琦] to deliver his presentation,” Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said.
However, KMT legislators insisted that Chen Chi-mai should first apologize for what occurred in the morning.
Unable to proceed with the meeting, Chen Chi-mai called for an adjournment, but KMT lawmakers ran to the podium and tried to take the microphones to prevent DPP legislators from speaking. DPP lawmakers resisted, and the two sides again engaged in physical and verbal conflicts.
The chaos continued until 5:30pm, when Chen Chi-mai declared that the meeting had been adjourned.
“I hereby announce that the meeting is adjourned for the day and will continue tomorrow,” Chen Chi-mai said. “I would like to ask KMT lawmakers to bring back the sign-up sheet, otherwise I may consider filing a charge of illegally seizing public property with police.”
The DPP caucus said that it would stay in the meeting room overnight.
Chen Chi-mai has scheduled another meeting for today to review the pact.
BACK TO NORMAL? The move would be part of a gradual easing of curbs monitored by the CECC, which would retain the quarantine mandate if case numbers rise again The Cabinet yesterday approved a plan to next month reopen Taiwan’s borders to all visitors and lift the quarantine mandate for arrivals, provided the nation’s COVID-19 situation does not escalate. The changes are likely to take effect on Oct. 13 as part of a phased easing of border controls that is to start on Thursday next week when a negative polymerase chain reaction test result would no longer be needed, Cabinet spokesman Lo Ping-cheng (羅秉成) told a news conference. Arriving travelers would instead be given four rapid antigen home test kits, Lo said. The three-day quarantine requirement followed by four days of mandatory
The Chinese navy has the ability to blockade Taiwan, but doing so could prompt a coordinated response by the international community to intervene to resolve the crisis for Taiwan, US Vice Admiral Karl Thomas said. “Clearly if they do something that’s non-kinetic, which, you know, a blockade is less kinetic ... then that allows the international community to weigh in and to work together on how we’re going to solve that challenge,” the commander of the US Navy’s 7th Fleet told the Wall Street Journal in an interview published on Monday. While he could not predict whether China would launch a full-scale
‘NO SURRENDER’: A blockade or outlying island seizure would be an act of war, and China’s drills last month have emboldened Taipei in its response plans, an official said The Republic of China Army Command Headquarters has agreed to purchase 5,000 Kestrel close-range anti-armor missiles worth NT$400 million (US$12.63 million) from the Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology, according to the military’s latest arms purchase bid notice. The army asked the institute to complete the order within 13 months, a military source said on condition of anonymity. Kestrel missiles are designed to penetrate armored vehicles and are used in anti-surface warfare, as they feature optical sights and night vision, and can be operated in all weather conditions. The missile has a 400m range, or a 150m range when used for breaching brick
COMMITTING TROOPS: The debate over ‘strategic ambiguity’ versus ‘strategic clarity’ in relation to US policy on Taiwan seems to have come to an end, a DPP lawmaker said US military forces would defend Taiwan if there was “an unprecedented attack,” US President Joe Biden said, underscoring the US’ commitment to the nation as Chinese incursions mount near its shores. Asked in a CBS 60 Minutes interview broadcast on Sunday whether US forces would defend Taiwan, Biden replied: “Yes, if in fact, there was an unprecedented attack.” Asked to clarify if he meant that unlike in Ukraine, US forces — American men and women — would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion, Biden replied: “Yes.” The interview was just the latest time that Biden has appeared to go beyond