Opposition parties in both camps yesterday sniped at President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) for an inauguration speech they said came well short of meeting people’s expectations.
Leading the attacks, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said Ma’s speech turned a deaf ear to public discontent with his policies and said it would launch a no-confidence motion against the Cabinet, as well as a series of recall attempts.
DPP interim chairperson Chen Chu (陳菊) told a press conference at the legislature that DPP lawmakers would launch a motion of no confidence and demand a complete reshuffle of the Cabinet after the Ma administration announced that all top Cabinet members would be retained.
In his inauguration address, Ma neither apologized nor responded to public anger toward his decisions to raise fuel and electricity prices and to favor relaxing a ban on imports of beef containing the livestock feed additive ractopamine, despite tens of thousands of people protesting on Saturday, Chen said.
Ma answered the public by deciding to keep Premier Sean Chen and retain almost all Cabinet members, she said.
“As an opposition party, the DPP will do whatever it takes to monitor the president, who has taken his own course without considering the public’s well-being and the country’s future,” Chen Chu said.
To maintain accountability, the party would launch a motion of no confidence to demand Sean Chen’s ouster and it would fully back the attempt to recall legislators who supported relaxing or lifting the ractopamine ban, she said.
Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) Chairman Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝) said his party would launch a two-year, three-stage plan to recall three Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) mayors, KMT lawmakers and the president.
Huang criticized Ma’s inclusion of the “one country, two areas (一國兩區)” proposal in his speech, saying that the proposal and the “fictitious ‘1992 consensus’” would place Taiwan under the “one China framework” in Beijing’s favor, which would be treasonable.
Huang suspected that Ma is ready to promote unification with China in his second four-year term.
“That would be Taiwanese people’s biggest nightmare,” he said, adding that Ma disqualified himself as a national leader for his non-recognition of Taiwan’s sovereignty and his claim that the land area encompassed in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is part of the territory of the Republic of China.
The TSU has laid out a three-stage plan to recall KMT politicians, Huang said.
The party would immediately work on attempts to recall the mayors of Taipei, New Taipei City (新北市) and Greater Taichung, followed by moves to recall various KMT lawmakers in February next year and Ma one year into his second term in May next year, as the law stipulates that elected officials and representatives could not be recalled before serving out a year into their terms.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) also criticized Ma’s mention of the so-called “1992 consensus” and “one country, two areas” in a message posted on his Facebook page as “irresponsible” and “a distortion of history.”
Lee, 89, said he had twice defined cross-strait relations as “special state-to-state relations” in 1999 when he was president.
The idea of “two areas” came out of nowhere since Taiwan does not include the PRC, Lee wrote.
The Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) is a domestic law that does not provide a legal basis to interpret the cross-strait status, Lee said.
While Beijing has never accepted the “one China with different interpretations” as imagined in the so-called “1992 consensus,” Ma’s recognition of “one China” jeopardizes Taiwan’s sovereignty and the re-emergence of authoritarianism, Lee added.
Meanwhile, the smaller pan-blue People First Party (PFP) also said it was dissatisfied with Ma’s speech.
“It was a total failure,” PFP Legislator Thomas Lee (李桐豪) told a press conference.
The PFP urged Ma to deliver a national report to the legislature at the earliest possible time and to be more receptive to public opinion.
“If [Ma] doesn’t change his way of doing things, the PFP does not rule out the possibility of initiating a recall campaign in one year,” he said.
“We did not see him reflect on his past mistakes, nor did we see him apologize and make a change for the better” in the inauguration speech, Thomas Lee said.
“For the future, he proposed only rhetoric and did not outline any vision,” he added.
Thomas Lee did not give an affirmative response as to whether the PFP would support the DPP’s motion to seek a no-confidence vote against the Cabinet.
“We do not exclude the possibility of toppling the Cabinet, but we need to think about the timing,” Lee said.
KMT Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾), who has been critical of the Ma administration, said that by and large she agreed with the direction Ma had set for the country, but “the point is how to implement his policy.”
KMT Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) said the party caucus would spare no effort to block a no--confidence vote as the move was just a political gesture.
“We should give the [Sean] Chen Cabinet more time to prove itself,” Wu said.
Executive Yuan spokesperson Hu Yu-wei (胡幼偉) said the premier was aware of the DPP proposal, but that his attention remained focused on livelihood issues, particularly the floods in Greater Tainan.
AIR SUPPORT: The Ministry of National Defense thanked the US for the delivery, adding that it was an indicator of the White House’s commitment to the Taiwan Relations Act Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) and Representative to the US Alexander Yui on Friday attended a delivery ceremony for the first of Taiwan’s long-awaited 66 F-16C/D Block 70 jets at a Lockheed Martin Corp factory in Greenville, South Carolina. “We are so proud to be the global home of the F-16 and to support Taiwan’s air defense capabilities,” US Representative William Timmons wrote on X, alongside a photograph of Taiwanese and US officials at the event. The F-16C/D Block 70 jets Taiwan ordered have the same capabilities as aircraft that had been upgraded to F-16Vs. The batch of Lockheed Martin
GRIDLOCK: The National Fire Agency’s Special Search and Rescue team is on standby to travel to the countries to help out with the rescue effort A powerful earthquake rocked Myanmar and neighboring Thailand yesterday, killing at least three people in Bangkok and burying dozens when a high-rise building under construction collapsed. Footage shared on social media from Myanmar’s second-largest city showed widespread destruction, raising fears that many were trapped under the rubble or killed. The magnitude 7.7 earthquake, with an epicenter near Mandalay in Myanmar, struck at midday and was followed by a strong magnitude 6.4 aftershock. The extent of death, injury and destruction — especially in Myanmar, which is embroiled in a civil war and where information is tightly controlled at the best of times —
Taiwan was ranked the fourth-safest country in the world with a score of 82.9, trailing only Andorra, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar in Numbeo’s Safety Index by Country report. Taiwan’s score improved by 0.1 points compared with last year’s mid-year report, which had Taiwan fourth with a score of 82.8. However, both scores were lower than in last year’s first review, when Taiwan scored 83.3, and are a long way from when Taiwan was named the second-safest country in the world in 2021, scoring 84.8. Taiwan ranked higher than Singapore in ninth with a score of 77.4 and Japan in 10th with
SECURITY RISK: If there is a conflict between China and Taiwan, ‘there would likely be significant consequences to global economic and security interests,’ it said China remains the top military and cyber threat to the US and continues to make progress on capabilities to seize Taiwan, a report by US intelligence agencies said on Tuesday. The report provides an overview of the “collective insights” of top US intelligence agencies about the security threats to the US posed by foreign nations and criminal organizations. In its Annual Threat Assessment, the agencies divided threats facing the US into two broad categories, “nonstate transnational criminals and terrorists” and “major state actors,” with China, Russia, Iran and North Korea named. Of those countries, “China presents the most comprehensive and robust military threat