China should refrain from political overtones when promoting cross-strait cooperation on Pingtan Island because more than 80 percent of Taiwanese reject China’s “one country, two systems” formula, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday.
The formula governed the return of former British colony Hong Kong to Chinese rule after 1997, in which the territory was allowed to keep its capitalist economy and British common law traditions for 50 years, while Beijing controls all foreign and defense policy.
Stopping short of saying that the government discourages investment in the Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental Zone, located on Pingtan Island in China’s Fujian Province, the council reminded Taiwanese that it is not a “co-pilot” project sponsored by the Taiwanese government.
The council issued the statement yesterday ahead of the departure today by a delegation of government officials, to be led by Straits Exchange Foundation Vice Chairman Kao Koong-lian (高孔廉), for a seven-day visit to southeastern China, including a tour of the zone.
Developed by China’s Fujian Provincial Government to become a pilot area for cross-strait cooperation, the Pingtan project is the centerpiece of Beijing’s West-Taiwan Strait Economic Zone plan, which has won the backing of China’s State Council.
Fujian Governor Su Shulin (蘇樹林) said on Wednesday that Pingtan is expected to receive more than 260 billion yuan (US$41 billion) in Chinese government subsidies over the next five years for infrastructure development.
China has put too much of a political overtone into the Pingtan project, which in fact was designed in accordance with its “12th five-year plan” that handles cross-strait relationships under the principle of the “one country, two systems” formula, council spokesman Liu Te-shun (劉德勳) said yesterday.
It has been proven by survey results over a long period that Taiwanese oppose the “one country, two systems” formula, he said.
While the Chinese have been promoting Pingtan as a cross-strait “co-pilot” project with five aspects — joint planning, joint development, cooperation, joint management and joint benefits — those were “not the facts,” Liu said.
The development of Pingtan would get better results if China focused on economic aspects and “removed unnecessary political factors,” he added.
Taiwanese-based engineering consultants have participated in the design of the project and some Taiwanese have been recruited, but that did not mean that it is the Taiwanese government’s policy to cooperate with China on the project, Liu said.
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Kao Charng (高長) said that the major difference between the Pingtan project and other special economic areas in China was that China has “made blatant moves” to promote the project and it has “expedient political purposes.”
“It’s fine, [China] can do whatever it likes, but we can’t let it mislead people in Taiwan that it [the project] has the consent of our government,” Kao said.
The council said it was not discouraging people from investing in Pingtan Island.
“We simply want people to have a better understanding about the project and make a thorough risk assessment,” Liu said.
Meanwhile, the Central News Agency yesterday quoted an unnamed Ministry of Economic Affairs official as saying that the Investment Commission would review applications for planned investment in Pingtan by Taiwanese businesses on a case-by-case basis.
The official said the reviews would take into account the potential impact of the investment in Pingtan on Taiwan in terms of economic and non-economic factors. If necessary, the ministry would consult with the relevant government agencies before reaching its final conclusion, the official added.
Additional reporting by staff writer
SOLIDARITY: A group of European lawmakers condemned China’s aggressive moves, while the foreign minister of Lithuania said Taiwan ‘cannot become a second Ukraine’ A German parliamentary delegation would visit Taiwan in the first week of October, German lawmaker Holger Becker on Monday told visiting Democratic Progressive Party legislators Fan Yun (范雲) and Lin I-chin (林宜瑾) at the Bundestag in Berlin. Asked by Fan whether he is worried about possible reprisals from Beijing, such as banning him and his family from entering China, Becker said he is more interested in visiting Taiwan, as “now is the time for democracies to stand together.” Fan and Lin also met with German officials to exchange views on digital education and governance. Investing in digital infrastructure and protecting equal rights to
As China waged extensive military exercises off Taiwan, a group of US defense experts in Washington was focused on their own simulation of an eventual — but for now entirely hypothetical — US-China war over the nation. The unofficial what-if game is being conducted on the fifth floor of an office building not far from the White House, and it posits a US military response to a Chinese invasion in 2026. Even though the participants bring a US perspective, they are finding that a US-Taiwan victory, if there is one, could come at a huge cost. “The results are showing that under
‘SIMULATED ATTACKS’: Ten warships each from China and Taiwan were maneuvering at close quarters in the Taiwan Strait, with some Chinese vessels crossing the median line Taiwan yesterday reiterated that it would not succumb to pressure from Beijing after China carried out its most provocative military drills in decades in retaliation for US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s trip to Taiwan last week. “We will never bow to pressure. We uphold freedom and democracy, and believe Taiwanese disapprove [of] China’s bullying actions with force and saber rattling at our door,” Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) said yesterday. China had “arrogantly” disrupted regional peace and stability, he said, calling on Beijing to not flex its military muscles. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has also called on the international community to “support
DRILLS CONTINUE: China’s creation of a restricted zone across the median line of the Taiwan Strait challenges a 70-year-old fact, a ministry of defense official said The nation’s military fully complies with international rules and guidelines when responding to Chinese military drills, the Ministry of National Defense said yesterday, vowing to continue defending Taiwan in accordance with international law. China on Thursday launched four days of military drills around Taiwan proper in response to US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taipei. The drills were expected to end on Sunday, but neither Beijing nor Taipei confirmed their conclusion, although the Ministry of Transportation and Communications said it had seen some evidence suggesting at least a partial drawdown. However, China yesterday said the drills would continue, saying “the