More than 60 academics and members of civic groups launched a petition yesterday to boycott the Chinese-language China Times newspaper over recent controversial remarks by its owner, Tsai Eng-meng (蔡衍明), concerning the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre.
Tsai, chairman and chief executive of the Want Want Group (旺旺集團) and owner of multiple media outlets including the China Times, said in an interview last month with the Washington Post that the 1989 crackdown on June 4 in Beijing did not constitute a massacre.
A joint petition drafted by academics and civic groups, including the Taipei Society and pro-democracy advocates, yesterday called for a “boycott of the crooked China Times.”
Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times
Petitioners called on the public to reject such an “unfaithful medium,” accusing the China Times of abandoning its responsibilities as a media outlet and allowing itself to become a tool for Tsai to ingratiate himself with a totalitarian regime.
Taipei Society director Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) appealed for more academics to join their efforts to blacklist the China Times, adding that they might petition government agencies in the near future.
National Chengchi University’s Department of Radio and Television associate professor Kuo Li-shin (郭力昕) said Tsai’s remarks had damaged the professionalism, autonomy and freedom of journalism.
Kuo also called on columnists perceived as pan-blue to back the boycott by “not writing or publishing” in the China Times in a bid to heal a split within society that divides people into either pan-blue or pan-green camps.
“This is just the first step,” Kuo said, adding that Tsai’s constant attempts to acquire and merge different media outlets have monopolized the supposedly diversified public voices of Taiwanese society.
Chiou Wen-tsong (邱文聰), an assistant researcher at Academia Sinica, expressed concern over how little attention the media have paid to Tsai’s remarks, describing the phenomenon as “the gradual collapse of Taiwan’s defense mechanism for its democracy.”
With the owner of a media outlet being in total control of its editorial line and monitoring what its reporters can put in their -articles, it appears as if Taiwanese are under the control of a totalitarian regime again, National Chengchi University professor Ku Chung-hwa (顧忠華) said.
Wang Dan (王丹), a student leader in Tiananmen Square in 1989 who initiated the boycott against the China Times last month via a post on his Facebook page, yesterday wrote on his Facebook page: “In my opinion, people are entitled to express their stance on historic incidents and to defend their freedom of speech in their own manner. It’s not necessary to force columnists currently working at the China Times to quit writing because of public pressure. So long as they can ensure that their articles are not altered or removed, we should respect their choices.”
Meanwhile, according to a reporter working at the China Times, employees scarcely talked about the controversy triggered by Tsai, adding that Tsai’s remarks and the China Times’ pro-China stance had caused jeering among his co-workers.
“We are only trying to make a living,” the anonymous reporter said, adding that Tsai, who last week said his remarks had been distorted and taken out of -context by the Washington Post and that he would communicate with people who misunderstood him, should keep his word and clearly explain his remarks.
Translated by Stacy Hsu, Staff Writer
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
EMBRACING TAIWAN: US lawmakers have introduced an act aiming to replace the use of ‘Chinese Taipei’ with ‘Taiwan’ across all Washington’s federal agencies A group of US House of Representatives lawmakers has introduced legislation to replace the term “Chinese Taipei” with “Taiwan” across all federal agencies. US Representative Byron Donalds announced the introduction of the “America supports Taiwan act,” which would mandate federal agencies adopt “Taiwan” in place of “Chinese Taipei,” a news release on his page on the US House of Representatives’ Web site said. US representatives Mike Collins, Barry Moore and Tom Tiffany are cosponsors of the legislation, US political newspaper The Hill reported yesterday. “The legislation is a push to normalize the position of Taiwan as an autonomous country, although the official US
CHANGE OF TONE: G7 foreign ministers dropped past reassurances that there is no change in the position of the G7 members on Taiwan, including ‘one China’ policies G7 foreign ministers on Friday took a tough stance on China, stepping up their language on Taiwan and omitting some conciliatory references from past statements, including to “one China” policies. A statement by ministers meeting in Canada mirrored last month’s Japan-US statement in condemning “coercion” toward Taiwan. Compared with a G7 foreign ministers’ statement in November last year, the statement added members’ concerns over China’s nuclear buildup, although it omitted references to their concerns about Beijing’s human rights abuses in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong. Also missing were references stressing the desire for “constructive and stable relations with China” and
RSS