The Red Cross Society of the Republic of China (ROC), which has raised nearly NT$1.7 billion (US$58.5 million) for disaster victims in Japan, more than all other Taiwanese charities combined, is facing criticism that most of the money has yet to leave Taiwan.
The complaints that only about a quarter of the money earmarked for Japan had been given to charitable aid efforts by yesterday came as attention focused on how the organization is managing the fund and how it plans to allocate the money.
“Every dollar we receive ultimately goes to Japan, but the donation drive is still ongoing and as a result, the dates and numbers are still subject to changes,” Red Cross Society of the ROC deputy secretary-general Lin Hsiu-fen (林秀芬) said.
The organization, partially state-run, has raised more than half of the NT$3 billion — including NT$300 million given by the government — pledged in aid by Taiwanese for Japan after a devastating earthquake and tsunami on March 11.
However, figures from the organization show that only US$15 million has been transferred to the Japanese Red Cross Society, the bulk of which was only wired yesterday after an internal decision was made on March 31.
The rest of the funds are sitting in a bank account as the group awaits more information on the kind of aid that Japanese relief groups require, officials with the Red Cross Society of the ROC said.
The interest earned from the money would be included in the final donation, Lin said.
However, the delay has infuriated online groups, with more than 20,000 people, as of yesterday, having joined a Facebook group calling on the organization to either immediately wire the remaining amount to Japan or refund all donations.
“What was given to Japan belongs to Japan,” Chiang Pin (江斌), posted on the Facebook group. “How Japan chooses to use that money is their business. [Taiwan’s Red Cross] should cough up.”
Another, Chen Jui-hsiung (陳瑞雄), said: “This time I donated directly to Japan’s representative office. Based on experience, I already had no confidence in the Red Cross Society.”
Phones were ringing around the clock at the Red Cross offices in Taipei, where volunteers were scrambling to answer calls about how the donations were being used. On average, it took four or five tries before callers were able to get through.
“As per our long-standing policy, we will honor refund requests. Our donors’ wishes are important to us and we will cooperate,” Lin said in response to the Facebook group, adding that the request would increase administrative costs.
The Red Cross Society of the ROC has come under fire in past.
In 2007, it was accused of misusing government subsidies. Financial statements from the organization showed that up to a third of its annual disaster relief fund had been set aside for office expenses between 2003 and 2006, in direct violation of caps on expenses.
The organization has also been criticized for its ongoing policy of giving kickbacks for fundraisers, which reached 15 percent in its Taipei chapter in 2005 before the practice attracted the attention of regulators.
At a press conference at the legislature yesterday, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers said they were concerned about the transparency of the fund for Japan and questioned how much would be lost in administrative and overhead costs.
“There are many valid concerns and I think [the Red Cross] needs to make themselves very clear,” DPP Legislator Yeh Yi-jin (葉宜津) said. “If they can’t, we will call on the public to boycott all donations to this secretive organization.”
Red Cross Society of the ROC officials said that many concerns were based on misconceptions about how the organization operates.
As per past practice, it has always distributed large disaster relief funds in stages depending on the needs of each particular relief operation. In the case of Japan, more funds will be distributed once long-term reconstruction efforts are finalized.
“The goals of the Red Cross’ efforts in Japan are not just disaster relief, but also long-term reconstruction efforts. We give the money in stages depending on the needs of disaster-zone residents over time,” the organization said in a statement.
Regarding claims by DPP Legislator Gao Jyh-peng (高志鵬) that senior organization administrators made as much as NT$200,000 a month, Red Cross Society of the ROC officials said that most senior administrators “would be happy if they earned half that amount.”
However, organization officials declined to answer questions on what percentage of the NT$1.7 billion received so far would be diverted to overhead costs and how much would eventually be wired to Japan.
It would be “unfair” to separate the fund this way, they said.
Organization officials said a final tally of the fund would be made on May 10 when the donation program ended.
Detailed documents on how the money was spent would be made public at that time, officials said.
Minister of Foreign Affairs Timothy Yang (楊進添) said he believed the Red Cross Society of the ROC would handle the money properly according to the needs of Japan in its disaster relief and reconstruction projects.
“Both the Red Cross Society of the ROC and the Japanese Red Cross Society are trustworthy,” Yang said.
Whether donations should be sent to Japan in instalments and how the money should be spent are decisions that should be made by the Red Cross Society of the ROC and Japanese Red Cross Society, Yang said.
Additional reporting by Shih Hsiu-chuan
Indonesia has sent hundreds of riot police to a tiny island after protests broke out against a China-backed project that would displace thousands of residents. About 1,000 people protested in Batam City on Monday over a plan to develop Rempang island into a Chinese-funded economic zone, including the construction of a multibillion-dollar glass factory, that would displace about 7,500 people. Some protesters clashed with security forces outside a government agency, wielding machetes, Molotov cocktails and stones, police said, adding that dozens were arrested. Beijing has poured money into infrastructure and resource projects in Southeast Asia’s biggest economy and its investments have previously caused
‘HARASSMENT’: A record 103 Chinese warplanes were detected in 24 hours, posing severe challenges to security in the Taiwan Strait and the region, the ministry said Taiwan yesterday told China to stop its “destructive unilateral actions” after more than 100 Chinese warplanes and nine navy ships were detected in areas around the nation. The Ministry of National Defense (MND) described the number of warplanes detected in 24 hours as a “recent high,” while Beijing has so far refrained from issuing any official comment on the sorties. “Between the morning of September 17th to 18th, the Ministry of National Defense had detected a total of 103 Chinese aircraft, which was a recent high and has posed severe challenges to the security across the Taiwan Strait and in the region,”
China would be making “a grave strategic mistake” if it tried to attack Taiwan, US Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Mark Milley said in an interview with CNN that aired on Sunday. Asked by host Fareed Zakaria whether the US could repel a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, Milley said: “It is entirely possible.” Milley reiterated that the US still maintains the Taiwan Relations Act, and that it wants “a peaceful outcome between Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China, and whatever that is between those two peoples.” “Militarily, I think China would make a grave strategic mistake if they attempted to
‘CRITICAL TRADE PARTNER’: The proposal had momentum due to a bipartisan consensus on boosting the economic partnership with Taiwan, a US senator said The US Senate Committee on Finance on Thursday passed the US-Taiwan Expedited Double Tax Relief Act, with US officials saying that it would ease pressure on investors and boost the partnership between Taipei and Washington, although Taiwan needs to enact reciprocal legislation for it to take effect. The bill — which was developed by US senators Ron Wyden, the committee’s chairman, and ranking member Mike Crapo, along with US representatives Jason Smith, chairman of the US House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means, and ranking member Richard Neal — was passed in a 27-0 vote. The proposal had momentum because of