Labor groups and opposition lawmakers expressed anger toward Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) yesterday over his comment that the inventor of unpaid leave should receive a Nobel prize.
The premier’s effort to downplay the incident did little to quell the anger.
“Premier Wu should apologize to all workers or step down. Treating workers like they are disposable should not be legally allowed,” said Son Yu-lian (孫友聯), secretary-general of the Taiwan Labour Front, referring to Wu’s remark on Tuesday during a meeting with firms that won the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ award for creating substantial job opportunities.
PHOTO: CHOU MIN-HUNG, TAIPEI TIMES
Wu said those who created the system deserved the Nobel Prize because the system helped businesses retain ties to their employees amid the global economic crisis, without having to pay a lot of money to lay off staff, with the added benefit that employees could return to their jobs when the economy improved.
Many high-tech and manufacturing companies put their workers on unpaid leave, with the result that salaries fell close to or below the minimum wage level. As many as 240,000 workers were on unpaid leave in March last year, a period in which firms slashed production targets because of falling demand.
Labor activists called the premier “brain dead,” saying he was insensitive to workers’ plight.
Taiwan Confederation of Trade Unions secretary-general Hsieh Chuang-chih (謝創智) said that if there were a Nobel prize for those who caused the most destruction to labor rights, the inventor of unpaid leave would be a sure winner.
“The premier himself has said that if workers on unpaid leave were counted as unemployed, then jobless rates would soar to 8 percent rather than 5 percent,” Hsieh said. “So it is not surprising that the government has praised the concept of unpaid leave because it paints a false picture of prosperity.”
While some companies were on the brink of collapse and could not survive without reducing labor costs, many others enjoyed huge profit margins, but joined the wave of unpaid leave to take advantage of the labor savings.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers called Wu’s comment a setback for the labor movement and asked him to retract his comment, apologize to workers nationwide or resign.
DPP Legislator Chen Ting-fei (陳亭妃) said the comment showed just how out of touch Wu was with the rest of the country. The government should be more focused on economic recovery instead of trying to trim back hard-won concessions from the working class, Chen said.
“These remarks come at a time when so many families have suffered from these unpaid holidays … so many people can’t pay their mortgage and are concerned about their next paycheck,” Chen said.
DPP Legislator Huang Wei-cher (黃偉哲) suggested Wu trying some unpaid leave himself.
“If Wu thinks that this idea should win a Nobel Prize … he should immediately take a two month unpaid holiday to see how it feels,” Huang said. “This might be of even greater benefit to Taiwan’s society and economy.”
DPP spokesperson Tsai Chi-chang (蔡其昌) said the party opposed Wu’s stance because the premier had failed to take into account the growing difference between the “haves and have-nots,” and unpaid leave unfairly benefited corporate interests.
KMT Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) joined in the criticism, saying Wu was disrespectful to laborers and had “hurt laborers’ feelings.”
However, KMT Legislator Ho Tsai-feng (侯彩鳳) defended Wu, saying the premier might be saying that the system helped employees secure their jobs amid the downturn.
Ho said the inventor of unpaid leave did deserve to be honored, but added that she hoped companies would no longer use the system because forcing employees to take unpaid leave was the same as forcing them to take a pay cut.
Meanwhile, Wu tried to defend himself yesterday, saying he did not really mean to recommend the companies try for a Nobel Prize.
“[The system] helped [laborers] keep their labor insurance and maintained companies’ ties with the employees amid harsh economic times. [Employees] can go back to work afterwards,” Wu said when approached by reporters for a comment. “God … People need to have more of a sense of humor.”
Taiwan is projected to lose a working-age population of about 6.67 million people in two waves of retirement in the coming years, as the nation confronts accelerating demographic decline and a shortage of younger workers to take their place, the Ministry of the Interior said. Taiwan experienced its largest baby boom between 1958 and 1966, when the population grew by 3.78 million, followed by a second surge of 2.89 million between 1976 and 1982, ministry data showed. In 2023, the first of those baby boom generations — those born in the late 1950s and early 1960s — began to enter retirement, triggering
ECONOMIC BOOST: Should the more than 23 million people eligible for the NT$10,000 handouts spend them the same way as in 2023, GDP could rise 0.5 percent, an official said Universal cash handouts of NT$10,000 (US$330) are to be disbursed late next month at the earliest — including to permanent residents and foreign residents married to Taiwanese — pending legislative approval, the Ministry of Finance said yesterday. The Executive Yuan yesterday approved the Special Act for Strengthening Economic, Social and National Security Resilience in Response to International Circumstances (因應國際情勢強化經濟社會及民生國安韌性特別條例). The NT$550 billion special budget includes NT$236 billion for the cash handouts, plus an additional NT$20 billion set aside as reserve funds, expected to be used to support industries. Handouts might begin one month after the bill is promulgated and would be completed within
NO CHANGE: The TRA makes clear that the US does not consider the status of Taiwan to have been determined by WWII-era documents, a former AIT deputy director said The American Institute in Taiwan’s (AIT) comments that World War-II era documents do not determine Taiwan’s political status accurately conveyed the US’ stance, the US Department of State said. An AIT spokesperson on Saturday said that a Chinese official mischaracterized World War II-era documents as stating that Taiwan was ceded to the China. The remarks from the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan drew criticism from the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation, whose director said the comments put Taiwan in danger. The Chinese-language United Daily News yesterday reported that a US State Department spokesperson confirmed the AIT’s position. They added that the US would continue to
IMPORTANT BACKER: China seeks to expel US influence from the Indo-Pacific region and supplant Washington as the global leader, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said China is preparing for war to seize Taiwan, Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said in Washington on Friday, warning that Taiwan’s fall would trigger a regional “domino effect” endangering US security. In a speech titled “Maintaining the Peaceful and Stable Status Quo Across the Taiwan Strait is in Line with the Shared Interests of Taiwan and the United States,” Chiu said Taiwan’s strategic importance is “closely tied” to US interests. Geopolitically, Taiwan sits in a “core position” in the first island chain — an arc stretching from Japan, through Taiwan and the Philippines, to Borneo, which is shared by
RSS