A US think tank has published a report based on the possibility that China might attempt a military takeover of Taiwan in less than 10 years time. Such a takeover is one of the “principal strategic challenges” the US could confront in the coming decades, the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) said.
The paper is aimed at pushing the Pentagon and Congress into discussion and debate on possible longer-term military crises as they decide what weapons systems to buy.
Evan Montgomery, a research fellow at CSBA and writer of the report, opens with an imagined news report dated August 2019.
It says the US faces conflict with China because Beijing has announced a blockade of Taiwan and demanded that Taipei accept incorporation into China as a “special administrative region.”
“Caught off-guard and cognizant that time is not on the side of Washington or Taipei, senior US officials are now frantically attempting to determine whether to intervene and, if so, how,” the paper says.
“The [People’s Republic of China] PRC seems determined to bring Taiwan’s de facto independence to an end and has spent over twenty years developing the means to do so,” the paper says.
The paper predicts that by 2019 China will have over-the-horizon radars, satellites and unmanned aerial vehicles for maritime and aerospace surveillance; thousands of surface-to-surface ballistic missiles, land-attack and anti-ship cruise missiles, anti-ship ballistic missiles and surface-to-air missiles; large numbers of fourth-generation fighter planes; six nuclear-powered attack submarines; anti-satellite weapons; and cyber warfare and electronic attack capabilities.
Montgomery suggests that China might opt for the blockade — after years of being considered a “responsible and peaceful nation” — as a result of growing internal strain caused by slowing economic growth and an increasingly dissatisfied population. In his scenario, Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leaders in 2017 and 2018 could increase both the frequency and volatility of their nationalist rhetoric as promised reforms are slow to materialize and economic growth rates continue to decline.
The report supposes that in August 2019, China’s president announces a “comprehensive trade enforcement operation” aimed at Taiwan. Any ship or aircraft not explicitly authorized by the Chinese government to enter Taiwan’s territorial waters or airspace “would do so at its own risk.” China says that the policy will continue until Taiwan’s “misguided” leaders accept incorporation into the PRC.
“In effect, China has placed a blockade around Taiwan that threatens its economic lifeline. CCP and People’s Liberation Army leaders appear to have calculated that by offering Taiwan considerable autonomy and placing the onus on others to fire the first shot, neither Washington nor anyone else will intervene,” Montgomery writes.
Faced with economic collapse in a matter of a few weeks, Montgomery speculates Taiwan would appeal to the US for support. Washington would try to solve the situation diplomatically while at the same time it would examine the possibility of breaking the blockade and neutralizing the most threatening of China’s weapons systems.
The Pentagon would also need a plan to defend US bases in the region as well as the territory of key allies while applying pressure on the PRC by threatening its sea-borne energy supplies and commercial exports, the report says.
Montgomery concludes that the US would have only a limited amount of time to prepare options and credibly demonstrate — to both Beijing and Taipei — a willingness and ability to resist China’s coercive efforts before Taiwan capitulated to Beijing’s demands — “a development that could fundamentally alter the balance of power and influence in the region.”
Entitled Defense Planning for the Long Haul: Scenarios, Operational Concepts and the Future Security Environment, the study comes just weeks before the Pentagon sends its Quadrennial Defense Review to Congress next month.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive