In a countdown toward war, President George W. Bush is ready to order a massive military strike against Iraq if Saddam Hussein refuses to surrender power by a deadline of 1am GMT ( 9am Taiwan time) tomorrow. Wary of retaliation, Bush braced Americans for possible terrorist attacks.
Yesterday, Iraq's leadership rejected Bush's ultimatum. Iraqi television said the decision was made in a joint meeting of the Revolution Command Council -- Iraq's highest executive body -- and the leadership of the ruling Baath party. Saddam chaired the meeting, it said.
Bush, in a prime-time speech Monday night, vowed to strike Iraq with "the full force and might" of the US military unless Saddam and his two sons leave Iraq within 48 hours. More than 250,000 American forces are poised for action in the Gulf. "The tyrant will soon be gone," the president pledged
PHOTO: AP
Having abandoned diplomacy at the stubbornly divided UN Security Council, Bush set about trying to win over an equally divided American public. A CNN-USA Today-Gallup poll found Americans just about evenly split on whether the United States should unleash military action without a new UN vote. Forty-seven percent supported such an action and 50 percent opposed it.
In Geneva a group of international jurists said yesterday that any US-led attack on Iraq was illegal without UN Security Council backing.
"In the absence of such Security Council authorization, no country may use force against another country, except in self-defense against armed attack," the Geneva-based International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) said.
PHOTO: AFP
"This rule was enshrined in the United Nations Charter in 1946 for a good reason: to prevent states from using force as they felt so inclined," said ICJ Secretary-General Louise Doswald-Beck in a statement.
Washington and its main allies, Britain and Spain say resolution 1441, warning of "serious consequences" if Iraq did not disarm, give sufficient grounds.
But the ICJ, a group of 60 eminent international legal experts, said resolution 1441, approved last November, was not enough, particularly as three permanent members of the Security Council -- France, Russia and China -- issued a statement at the time spelling this out.
Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, lamented the breakdown of diplomacy, as did India, France and Mexico.
Japan supported the US position. "It was a decision that had to be made," Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi said.
German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder had the opposite view.
"Does the threat posed by the Iraqi dictator justify a war, which is sure to kill thousands of innocent children, women and men? My answer in this case was and is: No," Schroeder said.
French President Jacques Chirac said a war without the support of the UN would undermine future efforts at peaceful disarmament. France led an effort to give UN weapons inspectors in Iraq more time to uncover banned weapons.
"To act without the legitimacy of the UN, to favor the use of force over law, is taking a heavy responsibility," Chirac said.
At the Vatican, which is against war in Iraq, spokesman Joaquin Navarro-Valls said "whoever decides that all peaceful means available under international law are exhausted assumes a grave responsibility before God, his own conscience and history."
In Tokyo, Koizumi described the ultimatum as "a very difficult decision" for Bush and reiterated his government's position that there was no need for a new UN resolution authorizing an attack.
Japan's constitution bars its armed forces from fighting in foreign wars, but Koizumi's government reportedly was considering humanitarian missions.
China's new premier called for "every effort" to avoid a conflict and said that UN weapons inspections must continue even as he acknowledged that the situation appeared dire.
"The arrow has already been placed on the bow," said Wen Jiabao in a speech on his second full day as China's prime minister. "As long as there is one glimmer of hope, we will not give up our efforts for a peaceful settlement."
In Mexico City, President Vicente Fox said that he regrets that the conflict appears headed for war, but that his nation's opposition to military action would not strain relations with the US.
Mexico, a member of the UN Security Council, had struggled with its position on Iraq, as Fox walked a fine line between offending voters at home who overwhelmingly oppose war and antagonizing the US, which accounts for about 75 percent of Mexico's trade.
"We maintain our belief that the diplomatic means to achieving (the goal) have not been exhausted," Fox said.
In Indonesia, a government spokesman lamented the apparent breakdown of diplomacy. "We still believe that a solution to the crisis should be found within the UN Security Council," spokesman Marty Natalegawa said.
Outside Jakarta's main mosque an Islamic activist made a dire warning.
"Don't blame the Muslims if the coming war in Iraq gives birth to thousands of new Osama bin Ladens," said Habib Rizieq Shihab of the Islamic Defenders Front.
The countdown to war has raised the prospect of a backlash by Muslims in Indonesia and Malaysia, making it difficult to crack down on radical groups.
"I don't understand how someone can want war like Bush does," said Srisu Sapti, a maid in Jakarta. "Women and children will be killed."
In New Zealand, Prime Minister Helen Clark said it was "highly debatable" whether a US-led strike on Iraq would be justified under international law.
India issued a veiled criticism of US unilateralism, while Pakistan planned an emergency session of Parliament today to discuss Iraq.
DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: Taiwan shares the same values as those that fought in WWII, and nations must unite to halt the expansion of a new authoritarian bloc, Lai said The government yesterday held a commemoration ceremony for Victory in Europe (V-E) Day, joining the rest of the world for the first time to mark the anniversary of the end of World War II in Europe. Taiwan honoring V-E Day signifies “our growing connections with the international community,” President William Lai (賴清德) said at a reception in Taipei on the 80th anniversary of V-E Day. One of the major lessons of World War II is that “authoritarianism and aggression lead only to slaughter, tragedy and greater inequality,” Lai said. Even more importantly, the war also taught people that “those who cherish peace cannot
STEADFAST FRIEND: The bills encourage increased Taiwan-US engagement and address China’s distortion of UN Resolution 2758 to isolate Taiwan internationally The Presidential Office yesterday thanked the US House of Representatives for unanimously passing two Taiwan-related bills highlighting its solid support for Taiwan’s democracy and global participation, and for deepening bilateral relations. One of the bills, the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, requires the US Department of State to periodically review its guidelines for engagement with Taiwan, and report to the US Congress on the guidelines and plans to lift self-imposed limitations on US-Taiwan engagement. The other bill is the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which clarifies that UN Resolution 2758 does not address the issue of the representation of Taiwan or its people in
US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo on Friday expressed concern over the rate at which China is diversifying its military exercises, the Financial Times (FT) reported on Saturday. “The rates of change on the depth and breadth of their exercises is the one non-linear effect that I’ve seen in the last year that wakes me up at night or keeps me up at night,” Paparo was quoted by FT as saying while attending the annual Sedona Forum at the McCain Institute in Arizona. Paparo also expressed concern over the speed with which China was expanding its military. While the US
‘FALLACY’: Xi’s assertions that Taiwan was given to the PRC after WWII confused right and wrong, and were contrary to the facts, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday called Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) claim that China historically has sovereignty over Taiwan “deceptive” and “contrary to the facts.” In an article published on Wednesday in the Russian state-run Rossiyskaya Gazeta, Xi said that this year not only marks 80 years since the end of World War II and the founding of the UN, but also “Taiwan’s restoration to China.” “A series of instruments with legal effect under international law, including the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Declaration have affirmed China’s sovereignty over Taiwan,” Xi wrote. “The historical and legal fact” of these documents, as well
RSS