The Government Information Office (GIO) is considering ending its funding of the Golden Horse film festival, after the event's organizing committee reportedly rejected a request to invite President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to its award ceremony in Kaohsiung tomorrow.
"We will consider ending our sponsorship of the event because of this," GIO Director-General Arthur Iap (
"The film festival is a non-governmental event. It would be great for us to see such events operate independently. No disputes over political issues would be caused if we stop our sponsorship," he said.
The GIO exclusively organized the festival from 1962 to 1989, after which civic organizations began hosting the event. The GIO has contributed NT$16 million a year since 1990 to fund the festival, which this year cost NT$31 million.
Wang Ying-hsiang (
"It's not a big deal at all. Dropping the sponsorship would be easier for us," Wang said.
The foundation is in charge of the Taipei Golden Horse Film Festival Executive Committee.
According to the Chinese-language media, the committee declined a request by the government for Chen to attend the award ceremony and to give a speech at the event, saying that the event preferred to "maintain its independence from politics."
The Presidential Office, however, told reporters yesterday that the president decided on Monday to attend an Aboriginal event in Miaoli that would be hosted at the same time as the award ceremony.
"There shouldn't be any problem with [the committee's] refusal," it said.
Premier Yu Shyi-kun also cancelled his scheduled attendance at the award ceremony yesterday. He said he made the decision on Wednesday after reading reports of Chen being denied an invitation.
"There are other events for the premier to attend Saturday night," said an aide at the premier's office who declined to be identified.
"We thought the film festival is important for the premier to attend, but the schedule was changed after today's incident," the aide said.
The organizers said that they welcomed all politicians to attend but have to follow the event's tradition that politicians cannot give speeches.
"We have followed three principles since 1997, that politicians may not go on stage, give speeches or award prizes. No politicians have taken the stage in the past five years," Wang said.
Wang said the principles had been adopted because of security problems in 1995 and 1996, when former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and former premier Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) attended the events.
Another sponsor of the event, Kaohsiung City Government, said yesterday that Kaohsiung City Mayor Frank Hsieh (
Kaohsiung City Government has injected NT$15 million into the event this year.
TSU lawmakers yesterday called for an end to the government's funding of the event because they believed the organizers had succumbed to Chinese pressure.
TSU Legislator Lo Chih-ming (羅志明) accused the organizers of caving into a reported demand from China that no government officials should speak at the event, lest Chinese actors decide not to attend.
Lo urged professionals in cultural circles not to accept such humiliation, adding that the TSU would suggest the GIO cut public funding for the event.
However, KMT Legislator Cheng Feng-shih (鄭逢時) said cultural events should not be politicized.
He said the Academy Awards in the US had never invited a US president to speak.
In 1990 the GIO officially gave the Motion Picture Development Foundation of the ROC the responsibility of organizing the event.
It invites movies from China, Hong Kong and Taiwan for the competition every year.
AIR SUPPORT: The Ministry of National Defense thanked the US for the delivery, adding that it was an indicator of the White House’s commitment to the Taiwan Relations Act Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) and Representative to the US Alexander Yui on Friday attended a delivery ceremony for the first of Taiwan’s long-awaited 66 F-16C/D Block 70 jets at a Lockheed Martin Corp factory in Greenville, South Carolina. “We are so proud to be the global home of the F-16 and to support Taiwan’s air defense capabilities,” US Representative William Timmons wrote on X, alongside a photograph of Taiwanese and US officials at the event. The F-16C/D Block 70 jets Taiwan ordered have the same capabilities as aircraft that had been upgraded to F-16Vs. The batch of Lockheed Martin
GRIDLOCK: The National Fire Agency’s Special Search and Rescue team is on standby to travel to the countries to help out with the rescue effort A powerful earthquake rocked Myanmar and neighboring Thailand yesterday, killing at least three people in Bangkok and burying dozens when a high-rise building under construction collapsed. Footage shared on social media from Myanmar’s second-largest city showed widespread destruction, raising fears that many were trapped under the rubble or killed. The magnitude 7.7 earthquake, with an epicenter near Mandalay in Myanmar, struck at midday and was followed by a strong magnitude 6.4 aftershock. The extent of death, injury and destruction — especially in Myanmar, which is embroiled in a civil war and where information is tightly controlled at the best of times —
Taiwan was ranked the fourth-safest country in the world with a score of 82.9, trailing only Andorra, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar in Numbeo’s Safety Index by Country report. Taiwan’s score improved by 0.1 points compared with last year’s mid-year report, which had Taiwan fourth with a score of 82.8. However, both scores were lower than in last year’s first review, when Taiwan scored 83.3, and are a long way from when Taiwan was named the second-safest country in the world in 2021, scoring 84.8. Taiwan ranked higher than Singapore in ninth with a score of 77.4 and Japan in 10th with
SECURITY RISK: If there is a conflict between China and Taiwan, ‘there would likely be significant consequences to global economic and security interests,’ it said China remains the top military and cyber threat to the US and continues to make progress on capabilities to seize Taiwan, a report by US intelligence agencies said on Tuesday. The report provides an overview of the “collective insights” of top US intelligence agencies about the security threats to the US posed by foreign nations and criminal organizations. In its Annual Threat Assessment, the agencies divided threats facing the US into two broad categories, “nonstate transnational criminals and terrorists” and “major state actors,” with China, Russia, Iran and North Korea named. Of those countries, “China presents the most comprehensive and robust military threat