May 27 to June 2
A man surnamed Tsou (鄒) was riding in the second to last carriage when terrified passengers began rushing in from the front of the train. A fire had broken out a few cars ahead, they said.
As Tsou pushed his way to the last car, the southbound train came to a halt atop the Sindian River Bridge (新店溪橋). He saw people jumping off the train into the river and sandbanks below.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Tsou did not jump; he and a group of passengers managed to exit from the tail of the train, walking over the tracks on the bridge to safety. The train then detached the burning carriages and continued forward, leaving behind four completely charred cars.
While the official death count was 21, an additional 43 missing passengers were presumed dead, making the May 28, 1948 event the most lethal train accident in Taiwanese history. The cause is believed to be passengers either bringing camphor powder or gasoline onto the train, and it didn’t help that the fire broke out on a bridge with little space to evacuate.
Donations for the victims and their families poured in over the following week, and the Taiwan Railways Administration also offered compensation. Tsou visited the Public Opinion Press (公論報) office the following day to contribute to their fundraiser, and also sat down to provide his first-hand account of the events. He reportedly gave them all the money he had on him, telling them to give half to the dead and half to the wounded.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
SAFETY ISSUES
Prior to the Sindian River Bridge accident, the worst train accident in Taiwan happened on June 21, 1918, as a southbound train ascended a steep slope between Yingge (鶯歌) and Taoyuan stations. A train connector snapped, hurtling loose carriages down the hill all the way back to Yingge Station. Most reports show 13 dead and hundreds injured. This spurred the Japanese colonial government to move the station and rebuild the tracks using a gentler circular slope. Completed in 1922, the new route is still in use today.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) took over the railway system when it arrived in 1945. At first, the newcomers worked alongside the Japanese and Taiwanese staff, but most Japanese had been sent home by the end of 1947.
In March 1948, the Railway Administration Council was upgraded to the Taiwan Railways Administration. Wen Wen-yu (溫文佑) writes in Study on Taiwan’s post-war railway history (戰後台灣鐵路史之研究) that one of the things the first chief, Lang Chung-lai (郎鍾騋), did was to establish a Traffic Safety Committee and promulgate comprehensive rules for disaster preparation and response. Lang noted that although accidents and malfunctions were frequent, they were mostly due to human error and could be prevented through stricter enforcement.
A particularly pesky issue was children stacking rocks on the tracks. This had been a problem since the Japanese era, Wen writes, but there were seven incidents due to this behavior in 1949 alone. On Dec. 9, 1957, a group of five and six year olds were playing on the tracks near Yingge, and the stones they left behind caused a serious derailment that killed 18 and injured more than 100.
TRAGEDY STRIKES
There was already a close call with a fire just 16 days before the Sindian River Bridge incident. The southbound train had just left Taipei station when someone accidentally spilled lighter fluid onto a pile of woven rush hats. The rims of these hats were supported with highly flammable film stock, which burst into flames. Fortunately the fire was put out quickly and nobody was hurt. The TRA subsequently banned such hats onboard.
Initial reports from the Public Opinion Press (公論報) show complete chaos on the train as the fire spread. There were about 300 people crammed into the affected carriages, and panic ensued as everyone clamored to escape.
Even before the train stopped, people began jumping out the windows into the river, and many drowned. Others were stuck in the crowd and burned alive.
TRA personnel soon arrived to remove the wreckage and retrieve bodies from the river. The exact cause of the fire remained under investigation for weeks, but the May 30 edition of the newspaper surmised that it was camphor powder or oil that ignited. Witnesses recall the smell of “burning celluloid,” which is partially made of camphor.
AFTERMATH
In a letter to the editor, a reader criticized the TRA’s enforcement efforts, saying that they spent more resources going after illegal vendors selling snacks on board instead of thoroughly checking for dangerous items.
Taoist memorials to transmute the souls of the dead were held on both sides of the river the following month, and dragon boat races were held alongside other performances.
In the ensuing months the TRA posted notices in all stations regarding dangerous substances and urged all staff to be vigilant in checking passenger luggage. It also began rewarding passengers who successfully reported any suspicious materials or behavior.
Firefighting equipment in the carriages were upgraded with all staff undergoing training. The TRA held regular safety competitions and rewarded workers for accident-free periods of varying duration.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that either have anniversaries this week or are tied to current events.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
RSS