Humans like to think we have a monopoly on understanding ourselves — that explanations for all our inner workings, including when things go awry, lie within our genetic code. We might like to think that, but we’re wrong. Whether it’s the diminutive bumblebee bat, the lightning-fast cheetah or even a lumbering hippo, mammals hold important clues to what makes us tick.
That’s the message of a massive data release from a project called Zoonomia, in which some 100 scientists at dozens of institutions spent over a decade collecting, sequencing and analyzing the genomes of 239 mammals (and one human thrown in for comparison). The ambitious work makes clear that animals have a lot to teach us about the more mysterious parts of our own genomes.
The initial findings are a welcome reminder that no matter how improbable, all of us have things in common. And maybe it gives us yet another reason to prioritize preserving the earth for every living being.
To be fair, the project isn’t only about understanding humans. The 11 papers released in the initial collection, published together in the prestigious journal Science, explore a wide range of topics. Researchers studied, for example, what gave the Alaskan sled dog Balto his speed and endurance; and how an animal’s genome can provide clues about its risk of extinction. (There is also an ongoing effort to study the long tooth of a narwhal, which scientists assure me is a real mammal and not just some figment of a child’s imagination.)
MUCH TO LEARN
But back to what it means for humans.
You might wonder why we have so much to learn from mammals. After all, we humans have sequenced millions of our own genomes, the expansive instructions for human development and functioning. Shouldn’t that tell us all we need to know?
The problem is we’ve only just scratched the surface, with the lion’s share of our genome still to be deciphered. We now have a pretty good understanding of the regions that encode for proteins, but that accounts for less than 2 percent of our DNA. It’s like being able to read only a few words on a page full of text — we might understand some of them, but lack the context and clues to deciphering all the rest.
This new collection of mammal genomes can help us home in on some of the more mysterious parts of our DNA — in particular, the regions that orchestrate when, where and by how much a certain protein should be made. Imagine your cell as a piece of music, with a conductor signaling for the volume to be turned up on certain proteins, or gesturing for others to quiet down. Disease brings discord — say, the strings have gotten too loud — and a cell might proliferate out of control or send the wrong signals.
We need animals’ genomes to understand that part of our own genome because they have so much more history behind them. Over the last 100 million years, ever single letter in their codes of life should have changed many, many times. So when researchers encounter a stretch of letters or even a single letter that’s stayed the same, it’s like a giant neon arrow pointing to something that is essential for life. They can reasonably assume that those areas are responsible for critical functions, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, the scientific director of vertebrate genome biology at the Broad Institute, and a leader of the Zoonomia project, says.
Humans, by comparison, only have about 200,000 years of existence under our belt. That means our genomes have undergone far fewer tweaks, making it much harder to look across a lot of them to decipher which areas might be important.
In other words, our animal friends can put our own genomes into better context. To be clear, just because researchers have identified those key, common parts of the genome that haven’t changed across species (also called “constrained regions”), doesn’t mean we necessarily know their function. Still, they can be useful for understanding human disease.
That could be especially true in cancer. Oncologists sequence the DNA from a patient’s tumor to look for mutations that could be causing cells to grow out of control. But that doesn’t always lead to easy answers — sometimes, it just leads to a long list of mutations that may or may not be driving someone’s cancer.
Zoonomia’s massive mammalian dataset offers a way to significantly narrow down that group, perhaps from 100 to just 10, or even to one, Lindbald-Toh says.
“You basically have a blueprint of whether something is important or not,” she says.
In one of the 11 Zoonomia papers, Lindbald-Toh and her colleagues used this concept to identify distinct genetic drivers for children versus adults with a type of brain cancer called medulloblastoma. They also showed that those tumors were likely to respond to specific cancer drugs, opening the door to using this new data to predict the best treatment course for patients. Lindbald-Toh now wants to repeat the exercise across many more kinds of tumors.
There are numerous other ways that this project can inform human health, disease, and potentially point to new ideas for medicines. The Zoonomia team offered a good example of how quickly the data could be used in the real world during COVID-19, when they were able to assess whether others species might be vulnerable to infection with the virus. Within weeks, their genome crunching showed that many were, with wildlife and endangered species at highest risk.
The strength of what can be learned from the project, and what can be learned about own health will only improve as more animals are added to the genomic zoo. Researchers are particularly keen to add more primates. Currently, only 43 are included, but they’d love to add some of the other 200 or so because they’ve been a particularly powerful guide to the most crucial parts of our genome.
Ideally, the genetic menagerie will eventually be broad enough to allow us to extract even more precise knowledge about ourselves — and thank mammals, of course, for the favor?
This month the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) announced a new policy ostensibly aimed at influencing the upcoming presidential election. A top-notch Voice of America (VOA) report observed “China launched a series of influence campaigns against Taiwan last week, unveiling a plan to promote integrated development across the Taiwan Strait.” The plan, a “demonstration zone,” offers incentives for Taiwanese to live, work and invest in Fujian Province, across the Strait from Taiwan, along with supplies of water, electricity and gas. Using cooperative zones to poach technology and influence Taiwanese is an old plan that has appeared in various
While participating in outrigger canoe activities in Hawaii, Yvonne Jiann (江伊茉) often heard indigenous locals say that their ancestors came from Taiwan. “I didn’t really understand why,” the long-time US resident tells the Taipei Times. Growing up in Taipei, she knew little about indigenous culture. “Only when I returned to Taiwan did I learn about our shared Austronesian cultural background and saw the similarities.” Jiann visited Taiwan just before the COVID-19 pandemic shut down international travel. Unable to leave and missing her canoe family across the Pacific Ocean, she started the Taiwan Outrigger Canoe Club (TOCC) and began researching how
SEPT. 25 to OCT. 1 Joyce McMillan was greatly moved by the pleas of the Taiwanese pastor and doctor who preached at her church in the summer of 1954. Hsieh Wei (謝緯) had just completed his medical residency in Buffalo, New York and stopped by Berkeley to raise funds and recruit staff for the tuberculosis treatment center the Presbyterian Church planned to open in his hometown of Puli, Nantou County. McMillan, who was a nursing aide, had the dream of being an overseas missionary since she was 7 years old. She also had a close friend die of tuberculosis. She expressed
Small things can mean a lot, and all revolutions start somewhere. So it is that the humble pocket, a repository for small things and once a minor consideration in clothes design, has become big news. A growing movement decrying the lack of proper pockets in women’s clothing has begun to find disciples in the world of high fashion, as well as among mainstream chains. A new study of the feminist question of pockets, published on Sept. 14, has already made a sizeable impact, despite the modest aims of the author, American academic Hannah Carlson. “I was very careful to make each chapter