Kuo Min-jung (郭敏容) was stumped when she learned of this year’s theme for the International Human Rights Film Festival (國際人權影展): “Power of Museums.” The previous topics were straightforward enough — climate change, transnational migration, medical rights and so on, but what did museums have to do with human rights?
“The room fell silent, and we looked at each other blankly,” Kuo recalls. “We considered giving up and going with something else, but suddenly we felt this determination to accept the challenge … especially since the festival is sponsored by [the National Human Rights Museum].”
After much digging, Kuo and the three other curators came up with five feature films and one animated short for the “Whose Museum is it?” section of the festival, which runs from today through Sunday at Spot Huashan Cinema in Taipei. The annual “Human Rights Lens” section explores issues that are pertinent today and also continues with some of the previous year’s topics.
Photo courtesy of International Human Rights Film Festival
For the first time since the festival’s inception in 2017, there will be a feature film — and a horror flick, no less. Set in post-apartheid South Africa, Good Madam is an eerie, psychological tale that delves into issues of race and class.
For those who can’t make it this weekend, the festival will go on-line from Sept. 26 to Oct. 10 on documentary streaming platform Giloo. There will also be collaborative screenings at different locales afterward.
FINDING THE RIGHT FILMS
Photo courtesy of International Human Rights Film Festival
Kuo says curators should always prioritize the quality of the films and let them speak for the topic, instead of letting the theme drive the selection.
But this time, the team started by getting their hands on any museum-related film they could find, and they first noticed that museums are a popular backdrop for commercial action, spy and romance flicks. There were also quite a few films that explored the history of certain museums, how they started, where their objects came from and other important and interesting events.
They then found films featuring museums that explored relevant issues such as climate change, but it still wasn’t exactly what they wanted. Finally, they came across the Dutch production, The Treasures of Crimea. In 2014, a museum in the Netherlands borrowed a collection of Crimean artifacts for a special exhibit. Just months later, Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine, leading to an international legal battle on whether the museum should return the artifacts to Crimea or to Ukraine.
Photo courtesy of Visit Films
“It features a museum, it’s connected to current events, the plot is exciting, the director is well-known and it’s relatively new,” Kuo says.
She noted that while international opinion overwhelmingly condemns Russia, especially with the ongoing war, this film avoids taking sides, instead exploring the conflict through identity and cultural relations with the artifacts.
“For a Crimean person, perhaps they voted to join Russia, but that doesn’t cut off their emotional connection to their cultural treasures,” Kuo says. “We had finally found a possible direction, and began discovering other films that followed this theme.”
The Colonial Institute is a layered examination on scientific research and artifact collection during Germany’s brutal colonization of Africa, with the German narrator constantly questioning and musing on the issue.
“You might have to watch it a few times,” Kuo says. “It makes us think about how many museums have more or less of a dark, violent history.”
Restitution: Africa’s Fight For Its Art is an info-packed primer on the same issue and explores the politics, language sensitivities and other concerns behind Western museums returning artifacts to their original owners.
On the contrary, in anthropologist Hu Tai-li’s (胡台麗) Returning Soul (讓靈魂回家), the Amis people of Tafalong don’t necessary want their historic column back from Academia Sinica — it’s more important to be able to guide its soul back to the village.
Finally, Girls Museum and Muteum challenge established structures in modern museums. By doing so, the films seek to bring in more diverse perspectives, whether gender, race or class.
“If you finish the entire section, you can probably get accepted to a museum studies graduate program,” quips co-curator Chen Chun-jung (陳俊蓉).
Chen says that the “Human Rights Lens” section is comparatively less academic, and the selections mainly discuss climate change, transitional justice and state violence.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless