Motorists discard cigarette butts and beverage containers along roadsides. Millions of people consume fossil fuels and single-use plastics, without stopping to think about the long-term impact on the planet. As recently as 2020, at least 126 companies were discharging pollutants into northern Taiwan’s Tamsui River (淡水河) — and surely most of them knew what they were doing.
Stricter enforcement of existing laws could reduce littering and polluting, but carrots and sticks aren’t the only tools available to policymakers. Taiwan’s government hopes that, by educating its citizens, the country can move closer to some of its environmental goals.
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION
Photo courtesy of Friendly SEED
The highest level of officialdom recognized the importance of environmental education (EE) more than three decades ago.
In Taiwan’s Struggle: Voices of the Taiwanese, David Chang-yi Chang (張長義) writes that Eugene Chien (簡又新), during his 1987-1991 tenure as the first minister of the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA), “pushed very hard for environmental education [believing that in] the long run, it is necessary to change peoples’ attitudes toward the environment and the best time to start is when people are young.”
However, the Environmental Education Act (環境教育法) didn’t go into effect until June 2011.
Photo courtesy Society of Wilderness
The act requires government units, state-owned enterprises, schools and NGOs that receive 50 percent of their funding from the government to arrange annual environmental education programs for all employees and students, and that classes or activities last at least four hours. These programs reach about one in six Taiwanese.
A March 2013 Global Views Monthly report on the act’s ramifications quoted Chou Ju (周儒), then a professor at National Taiwan Normal University’s (NTNU) Graduate Institute of Environmental Education, as hoping it’d help schools move beyond a common but mistaken belief that garbage separation and recycling count as environmental education.
On top of mandatory programs — and lessons in school textbooks that explain climate change and how to reduce food waste — several NGOs prioritize environmental education.
Photo courtesy of Friendly SEED
Society Of Wilderness (SOW, 荒野保護協會, www.sow.org.tw) is one of them. In addition to protecting habitats and natural ecosystems, the organization aims to “promote awareness of nature conservation, and provide opportunities and environments needed for nature education to the general public,” its Web site says.
Before the pandemic, the society’s 11 branches in Taiwan held regular indoor lectures, on-site activities and training courses for volunteers.
“We’ve designed a lot of content for children and parents. That, in addition to our environmental initiatives, has helped a greater number of people understand our ideas and objectives,” says SOW Secretary-General Lua Jane-lung (劉建隆).
Photo courtesy Society of Wilderness
In 2018 and 2019, total attendance at SOW events was 419,875. Because COVID-19 reduced the scale of in-person events, the combined tally for 2020 and last year was 261,348.
So they can continue their work in spite of restrictions on gatherings, SOW has been putting out podcasts, online videos and livestreams. The “Good Morning Wilderness” (早安荒野) podcast, launched last year, has covered topics such as land crabs, the waterbirds that flock to 52-jia Important Wetland (五十二甲溼地) in Yilan County and the Four-Spot Midget (四斑細蟌).
A rare damselfly, the Four-Spot Midget is found in just a handful of brackish estuaries in East Asia, including a few around Taipei. Alongside research, education and publicity are central to SOW’s efforts to protect both the species and the ecologically-sensitive places it inhabits.
Photo: Courtesy Society of Wilderness
To meet their obligations under the Environmental Education Act, or their own corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability goals, some institutions and companies work with organizations like Friendly SEED (環境友善種子, www.friendlyseed.com.tw), a social enterprise that specializes in providing environmental education services.
Friendly SEED’s clients include Carrefour, E.Sun Commercial Bank (玉山銀行), Guandu Nature Park (關渡自然公園), Hitachi, HSBC and the Taiwan Black Bear Conservation Association (台灣黑熊保育協會).
Since 2014, Kimberly-Clark and Tetra Pak have sponsored 185 Friendly SEED events in local elementary schools. These classes stress the importance of woodland conservation and the role of the Forest Stewardship Council, an international NGO that promotes responsible management of the world’s forests.
Photo: Steven Crook
Friendly SEED also customizes programs for corporate clients’ employees and their families. Because office workers aren’t so willing to attend conventional classes, the social enterprise has learned to “implant environmental concepts in outdoor activities, and offer a less structured curriculum,” says Chiu Yun-hsuan (邱韻璇), the organization’s southern office director.
Common activities include beach and mountain cleanups, tree-planting and the removal of invasive species.
ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS
Joking that teaching in the traditional manner is “probably the most useless way,” Chiu explains that: “Behavior starts with awareness, so — as much as possible — we hope to create first-hand environmental experiences.”
Rather than focus on a practical issue like habitat conservation, Friendly SEED endeavors to cultivate environmental ethics.
“We’re more concerned about the relationship between humans and the environment, and our courses and activities cultivate participants’ sensitivity and concern,” she says.
The definition of environmental education that appears on the Taiwan EPA Web site is similar: It should help citizens “develop the concept of environmental ethics and the consensus of public participation in environmental protection.”
“It’s difficult to change attitudes and actions in a single lesson or activity. But when we hold a one-off event, we hope at least to arouse awareness of the environment and get people to pay attention to environmental issues, so they’ll carry this concern into their daily lives,” Chiu says.
To bring about effective change, Chiu says, it’s necessary to create opportunities for long-term cooperation between NGOs, schools, companies and government departments. Through such cooperation, she says, “participants can understand their relationship with the environment and deepen their willingness to participate.”
Unfortunately, COVID-19 has prompted many of the companies that Friendly SEED works with to suspend or postpone planned events. There’s a strong preference for real-life activities over online education, Chiu says.
Proponents of environmental education say it can benefit participants as well as help the planet. Youngsters who join these events, they say, are less likely to develop biophobia or suffer from nature-deficit disorder. Getting them outside and active may reduce the incidence of obesity and depression.
A 2018 survey of environmental literacy among undergraduate students, led by scholars at National Taiwan Normal University and Shih Hsin University, found a strong preference for outdoor experiential learning and visits to museums and conservation centers over lectures or online learning. The survey also discovered that most students derived their environmental knowledge from television programs (including news reports) and information seen online, instead of NGOs, textbooks or lectures.
A paper analyzing the survey results, published in Sustainability in May 2018, noted that female students appeared to outperform males in all categories of environmental literacy. Saying that this was consistent with previous studies, the paper’s authors speculated that it could be a consequence of gender roles, because women in Taiwan have “traditionally been taught to love and maintain cleanliness” and take care of their homes.
Survey findings also revealed “no significant correlations between knowledge and attitudes or between knowledge and behavior. However, a higher level of environmental knowledge correlated significantly with a higher degree of pro-environmental behavior [and] stronger attitudes.”
In other words, a little environmental education might be a waste of time, but drumming in key messages could have an effect on people’s actions.
Arguing that simply imparting scientific knowledge often fails to elicit the “values and behavior which constitute a substantial part of environmental literacy,” the paper’s authors recommended that attitudes “be enhanced through interaction with the environment,” so students “develop a sense of responsibility, and increase a personal and collective sense of competence for promoting responsible environmentally-friendly behavior.”
To build environmental awareness, it’s imperative to get people out of their offices and classrooms. And there’s no need to travel to a national park: A guided visit to the nearest polluted waterway or garbage incinerator may be just as effective.
Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks. The views expressed here are his own.
Last week, Viola Zhou published a marvelous deep dive into the culture clash between Taiwanese boss mentality and American labor practices at the Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) plant in Arizona in Rest of World. “The American engineers complained of rigid, counterproductive hierarchies at the company,” while the Taiwanese said American workers aren’t dedicated. The article is a delight, but what it is depicting is the clash between a work culture that offers employee autonomy and at least nods at work-life balance, and one that runs on hierarchical discipline enforced by chickenshit. And it runs on chickenshit because chickenshit is a cultural
My previous column Donovan’s Deep Dives: The powerful political force that vanished from the English press on April 23 began with three paragraphs of what would be to most English-language readers today incomprehensible gibberish, but are very typical descriptions of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) internal politics in the local Chinese-language press. After a quiet period in the early 2010s, the English press stopped writing about the DPP factions, the factions changed and eventually local English-language journalists could not reintroduce the subject without a long explanation on the context that would not fit easily in a typical news article. That previous
By far the most jarring of the new appointments for the incoming administration is that of Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) to head the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF). That is a huge demotion for one of the most powerful figures in the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Tseng has one of the most impressive resumes in the party. He was very active during the Wild Lily Movement and his generation is now the one taking power. He has served in many of the requisite government, party and elected positions to build out a solid political profile. Elected as mayor of Taoyuan as part of the
April 29 to May 5 One month before the Taipei-Keelung New Road (北基新路) was set to open, the news that US general Douglas MacArthur had died, reached Taiwan. The military leader saw Taiwan as an “unsinkable aircraft carrier” that was of huge strategic value to the US. He’d been a proponent of keeping it out of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) hands. Coupled with the fact that the US had funded more than 50 percent of the road’s construction costs, the authorities at the last minute renamed it the MacArthur Thruway (麥帥公路) for his “great contributions to the free world and deep