July 29 to Aug 4
While the Chinese were doing everything they could during the Cultural Revolution to destroy their cultural heritage, Taiwan launched the Chinese Cultural Renaissance Movement to do the opposite.
On the surface, the goal of the movement was to establish Taiwan’s Republic of China (ROC) government as the rightful heir and protector of Chinese culture and morals, but as Lin Kuo-hsien (林果顯) shows in “Study of the Council on Promotion of the Chinese Cultural Renaissance Movement” (中華文化復興運動推行委員會之研究), it also had a political agenda.
Photo courtesy of National Central Library
With reclaiming China pretty much out of the question, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) launched the movement as a “‘cultural counterattack’ [against China] to keep people’s spirits mobilized in order to continue its wartime provisions, and to build up the image of its leader as the successor of traditional Confucian morals to solidify the legitimacy of [KMT] rule,” he writes.
The council was established in late July 1967, with Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) presiding over 11 committees covering aspects of life including education, mass media, youth activities, women’s issues and public morals.
After many changes in structure and objectives, the council still exists today as the General Association of Chinese Culture (中華文化總會). Its mission today shows that like many organizations in Taiwan, it retains the word “Chinese” only in name: “To continue to enhance and cultivate Taiwan’s cultural power; to continue to facilitate cultural exchanges and cooperation between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait; and to strengthen exchanges between Taiwan and the international community.”
Photo courtesy of National Central Library
LEGITIMIZING AUTHORITARIANISM
Taiwan was a contradiction in the 1960s. It had obtained US support by championing free and democratic values and staunchly opposing communism — the “authoritarian and brutal” Chinese Communist Party. However, Taiwan remained under martial law, the ROC National Assembly had not held elections since 1947 and Chiang established himself as president-for-life under wartime provisions even though he had reached his term limit in 1960.
While the KMT had little hope of retaking China, it used propaganda to maintain the illusion that war could break out at anytime to justify its military rule and keep its population united and patriotic. The Cultural Revolution broke out in China in 1966, giving the KMT a perfect opportunity to launch the Chinese Cultural Renaissance Movement as a countermovement.
Photo courtesy of National Central Library
It was not the first not the first of its kind. The KMT had launched the Cultural Reform Movement (文化改造運動) and the Cultural Cleansing Movement (文化清潔運動) in the 1950s. These movements share the common goals of shaping the world view of its constituents by repeatedly promoting KMT founder Sun Yat-sen’s (孫逸仙) Three Principles of the People (三民主義), fostering unwavering allegiance to Chiang and carrying out the ultimate goal of defeating the Chinese communists.
The council was made up of scholars, cultural experts and a large number of high-level KMT officials. In addition to promoting traditional Chinese arts, it sought to instill the ancient “Four Principles and Eight Virtues” (四維八德) among the populace.
These ideals were heavily integrated into the school curriculum, and students participated in patriotic essay contests and singing competitions. Since many young Taiwanese had never lived in China, the association steered them toward identifying with China, which for ROC leaders included Taiwan. In this way, the students would view reclaiming “the motherland” as their own personal mission, Lin writes.
Photo courtesy of David Schroeter via Flickr
The council even claimed that Taiwan’s indigenous people came from China, and aimed to eradicate local languages in favor of Mandarin. It also established guidelines on how people should conduct themselves, ranging from respecting the flag and anthem to personal hygiene and manners such as refraining from eating while walking. It also focused on international propaganda at a time when the world’s powers started to question the KMT’s legitimacy in representing China.
POST-CHIANG YEARS
Chiang died in 1975, and his successor Yen Chia-kan (嚴家淦) took over as council head. The ROC’s standing in the world had changed dramatically — it had broken ties with the US and withdrawn from the UN while domestically it faced a proliferation of democracy protests and publications. Premier Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) was more focused on building the economy and political reform, and declined to take over as committee head when he became president in 1978, indicating that the movement’s importance had diminished.
“Chiang Kai-shek, who led both the party and the military and was also the protector of traditional morals, was irreplaceable,” Lin writes. Yen, who many saw as a lame duck president, actually remained as council head until 1990 despite not holding any political position after 1978.
The younger Chiang was less interested in promoting traditional morals, instead pushing a modern “cultural construction” (文化建設) program that would set up libraries, concert halls, museums and other institutions in every county and city. This also included setting up cultural festivals, awards and fostering talent. Chiang understood the importance of involving Taiwanese in government affairs, and his policies also paid attention to local folk culture and historic relics instead of being completely Chinese-oriented.
Nevertheless, the council continued to operate as it did before. One notable program it undertook in the early 1980s involved endorsing the plum blossom — the national flower, which blooms in cold weather — as a defining symbol of Chinese culture.
In 1991, the council was downsized and restructured as the General Association of Chinese Cultural Renaissance (中華文化復興運動總會) with then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) as head. While the mission was still to promote Chinese culture and build national character, Lin notes that the budget allocated to promoting Taiwanese culture was significantly larger than the one for Chinese culture.
Chiang Kai-shek would surely turn in his mausoleum upon hearing that!
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
The Ministry of Education last month proposed a nationwide ban on mobile devices in schools, aiming to curb concerns over student phone addiction. Under the revised regulation, which will take effect in August, teachers and schools will be required to collect mobile devices — including phones, laptops and wearables devices — for safekeeping during school hours, unless they are being used for educational purposes. For Chang Fong-ching (張鳳琴), the ban will have a positive impact. “It’s a good move,” says the professor in the department of
Article 2 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China (中華民國憲法增修條文) stipulates that upon a vote of no confidence in the premier, the president can dissolve the legislature within 10 days. If the legislature is dissolved, a new legislative election must be held within 60 days, and the legislators’ terms will then be reckoned from that election. Two weeks ago Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) proposed that the legislature hold a vote of no confidence in the premier and dare the president to dissolve the legislature. The legislature is currently controlled
RSS