American students are getting cold feet about studying Chinese in China, with many study abroad program in the country seeing a substantial drop in enrollment over the last few years.
At the University of California Education Abroad Program (UCEAP), student enrollment in programs in China are expected to be less than half the level they were only four years ago. Washington-based CET, another leading study abroad group, says interest in China has been falling since 2013.
The apparent waning of interest worries some China watchers. Given the importance of the US-China relationship, having a group of Americans across different industries who speak Chinese and understand the culture is “a matter of national interest,” says Robert Daly, director of the Kissinger Institute on China and the United States at the Wilson Center in Washington.
Photo: REUTERS
“We can’t respond coherently, effectively and fully to China unless we understand China on its own terms,” he said.
The Institute of International Education says the number of US students studying in China fell 3.2 percent in 2012 to 2013 to 14,413, even as overall study abroad numbers rose modestly.
American students’ apparent loss of interest contrasts with Chinese students’ clamor for a US education. The number of Chinese studying in the United States jumped 16.5 percent in 2013 to 2014 to more than 274,000.
LESS NEED FOR FOREIGNERS
For US students, China’s notorious pollution is a concern. Job opportunities are another. As multinationals in China hire mostly local Chinese, a growing percentage of whom have studied abroad, they have less need for foreigners who speak Chinese.
“I came to China thinking I could learn Chinese and get a high paying job. I learned very quickly that was not the case,” said Ian Weissgerber, a 25-year-old American graduate student in China. “A lot of Chinese can speak English just as well as I can, and Chinese is their native tongue too.”
Gordon Schaeffer, research director at UCEAP, says surveys suggest the decline in study abroad programs in China might also reflect students’ migration to science and technology majors, where courses need to be taken in sequence.
Some study abroad executives say a move towards more direct enrollment in Chinese universities could also, in part, account for fewer students taking traditional programs that typically offer a summer or semester overseas.
Wang Huiyao, president of the Center for China and Globalization and the author of a report on foreign students in China, says there are too few agents in the United States bringing students to China to study, and bemoans the US government’s inability to force universities to send more American students there.
NO PAY-OFF?
When students do come to China, they are increasingly coming for shorter periods of time, and often for trips that involve more travel than language study, study abroad executives say.
After a burst of enthusiasm a decade ago, interest in learning Chinese appears to be waning among US students. Enrollment in entry level Chinese is almost half the level of 2007 at Middlebury College, a private liberal arts college in Vermont renowned for its language instruction.
Last year’s total Chinese enrollment was “the lowest in a decade,” said Professor Thomas Moran, chair of Middlebury’s Chinese department.
Between 2002 and 2006, Chinese language study at US institutes of higher education jumped 50 percent, according to the Modern Language Association (MLA); it grew a further 16 percent between 2006 and 2009.
But from 2009 to 2013, growth in enrollment had slowed to just 2 percent, an MLA study released last month shows.
Enrollment in all foreign language courses at US higher education institutions fell 6.7 percent between 2009 and 2013, according to the MLA study.
“It really comes down to money,” says John Thomson, a veteran China study abroad executive. “You’re taking yourself out of the job market for a couple years to study an extremely difficult language with no guaranteed pay-off at the end.”
Buffeted by earthquakes and the potential of conflict with China, Taiwan’s leaders want to accelerate plans to make the island more resilient to communications breakdowns and direct attacks on its digital infrastructure. It could be an impossible task. Audrey Tang (唐鳳), the head of the Ministry of Digital Affairs, says she wants the country’s US$740 billion economy to be able to handle the possible collapse of all its communications in the event of an emergency by the end of next year. The threat isn’t theoretical: the Matsu Islands found themselves digitally adrift after two of their submarine internet cables were severed by boats
May 28 to June 3 Taiwan provincial governor Chen Cheng (陳誠) was adamantly opposed to the state-run Central Daily News (中央日報) moving from Nanjing to Taipei in 1949. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) already had a mouthpiece in Taiwan, the China Daily News (中華日報), and he argued that the relocation of the Central Daily News “would have absolutely no function besides affecting the morale of the people,” according to the book 1949: An Earth-Shattering Year (1949: 石破天驚的一年) by Lin Po-wen (林博文). Chen likely had a grudge against the paper too. Despite editor-in-chief Tao Hsi-sheng’s (陶希聖) “central first, then daily” policy prioritizing the
A fine-grained opinion piece in United Daily News (UDN) in December was packed with data that tells the story of the coming voter shifts in this election. The piece cited another UDN poll from early last year that surveyed residents of the six municipalities. The overall data identified four areas of major concern: housing prices (named by 50.6 percent), low salaries and insufficient career opportunities (32.2 percent), transportation problems (26.5 percent) and air pollution (25.1 percent). The next more important issue was public order at 10.1 percent. None of these issues have become a signature issue for any of the presidential
A while back, I came up with a ratio to determine whether it’s worthwhile to visit a particular location, what I call the transit-to-travel ratio. It’s simple: at a minimum, only one-tenth of the time should be spent in transit — car, bus, plane, train. A 20-minute MRT ride to Taipei’s Elephant Mountain, for example, and then a four-hour hike on the Taipei Grand Trail, counts as “making the ratio.” A High Speed Rail trip down to Kaohsiung and back and then several hours driving to and from the base of Jade Mountain to hike for one day is the