Dance and choreography are often described in terms of liquidity or fluidity of movement. This afternoon a group of young Taiwanese dancers will use their bodies to focus attention on the most precious fluid of all — water — and the need for safe drinking water for everyone, as part of a 24-hour worldwide event, Global Water Dances.
The project is the brainchild of 11 Laban Movement analysts who were inspired by a dance and the environment conference they attended in England in 2009. (Labanotation and Laban Movement Analysis were first developed by Rudolf Laban in the early 20th century as a way of describing, notating and recording human movement used by dancers, physical therapists and others.) The 11 all had experience with Laban’s idea of Movement Choirs, which are events aimed at creating social cohesion through community dances. Planning for tomorrow’s event began last year with the creation of a Web site and networking.
Global Water Dances begins in Pacific Rim nations and travels westward around the world, involving dancers, musicians and other artists in 60 cities. It can be followed online at globalwaterdances.org.
Photo Courtesy of Chen Yi-shu, Dancecology
The Taiwanese portion has been organized by a two-year-old troupe called Dancecology (舞蹈生態系創意團隊), founded and directed by Peng Hsiao-yin (彭筱茵), a former member of the Neo-Classical Dance Company (新古典舞團) who received her MFA from the Graduate Institute of Choreography at Taipei National University of the Arts (TNUA). She wanted to move beyond the traditional limits of stage-bound performance to focus on environmental theater, hence the thinking behind the troupe’s name — dance plus ecology, or Dancecology.
Since the group’s founding, it has performed at the 2009 Kuandu Arts Festival, the Taipei Fine Arts Museum, Juming Museum and, earlier this year, at the Taipei International Flora Expo. It was selected as the 2009-2010 artist-in-residence at the TNUA KD Art Culture Industry Innovation Incubation Center. The company joined the Global Water Dances lineup at the end of last year.
Peng’s work is usually site specific and today’s show will take place in the viewing area in front of Zhuwei Wharf (竹圍碼頭) in Tamsui, which is a short walk along the bikeway from the Zhuwei MRT Station (竹圍捷運站). It is also the site of Plum Tree Creek (樹梅坑溪), which was the inspiration for Peng’s portion of the program.
Photo Courtesy of Chen Yi-shu, Dancecology
In her program notes Peng said the creek, a branch of the Tamsui River, was once the only source of fresh water in the Zhuwei area, but rapid development has left it little more than a gutter. Starting last year, several historians, artists and local residents banded together to draw awareness to the creek’s plight and push for its restoration.
Eight dancers and two musicians will be performing this afternoon, joined by children from Zhuwei Elementary School for sections three and four (“The Water Dance” and “Confluence”), which are the global collective portions of the program.
Peng choreographed the first two sections: “Flowing with Water,” which she said will gather the energy of participants and flow along with the Plum Tree Creek, and “The Story of Plum Tree Creek,” telling how humans change and damage nature.
To encourage people to get involved in helping to save the creek and protect Taiwan’s environment, audience members will be invited to join the dancers at several points during the show. For example, when the dancers who are portraying the creek are being polluted by the dancers who are playing the role of garbage, “we’ll invite the audience to save them,” Peng said. In “Confluence,” the troupe’s dancers will lead the audience in a group dance. In “The Water Dance,” dancers and volunteers will perform the same moves that are being danced around the world today.
In addition, after the show audience members will be invited to take a pledge to treasure water resources and reduce daily water pollution. Those who do will be invited to add their handprints to a long roll of paper.
The idea is to turn the paper into a “river of hands,” Peng said.
Dancecology notified us after the paper went to press that because of the advent of Typhoon Meari, their performance will be postponed until next Saturday, July 2, at 5pm at the same location.
Buffeted by earthquakes and the potential of conflict with China, Taiwan’s leaders want to accelerate plans to make the island more resilient to communications breakdowns and direct attacks on its digital infrastructure. It could be an impossible task. Audrey Tang (唐鳳), the head of the Ministry of Digital Affairs, says she wants the country’s US$740 billion economy to be able to handle the possible collapse of all its communications in the event of an emergency by the end of next year. The threat isn’t theoretical: the Matsu Islands found themselves digitally adrift after two of their submarine internet cables were severed by boats
May 28 to June 3 Taiwan provincial governor Chen Cheng (陳誠) was adamantly opposed to the state-run Central Daily News (中央日報) moving from Nanjing to Taipei in 1949. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) already had a mouthpiece in Taiwan, the China Daily News (中華日報), and he argued that the relocation of the Central Daily News “would have absolutely no function besides affecting the morale of the people,” according to the book 1949: An Earth-Shattering Year (1949: 石破天驚的一年) by Lin Po-wen (林博文). Chen likely had a grudge against the paper too. Despite editor-in-chief Tao Hsi-sheng’s (陶希聖) “central first, then daily” policy prioritizing the
A fine-grained opinion piece in United Daily News (UDN) in December was packed with data that tells the story of the coming voter shifts in this election. The piece cited another UDN poll from early last year that surveyed residents of the six municipalities. The overall data identified four areas of major concern: housing prices (named by 50.6 percent), low salaries and insufficient career opportunities (32.2 percent), transportation problems (26.5 percent) and air pollution (25.1 percent). The next more important issue was public order at 10.1 percent. None of these issues have become a signature issue for any of the presidential
A while back, I came up with a ratio to determine whether it’s worthwhile to visit a particular location, what I call the transit-to-travel ratio. It’s simple: at a minimum, only one-tenth of the time should be spent in transit — car, bus, plane, train. A 20-minute MRT ride to Taipei’s Elephant Mountain, for example, and then a four-hour hike on the Taipei Grand Trail, counts as “making the ratio.” A High Speed Rail trip down to Kaohsiung and back and then several hours driving to and from the base of Jade Mountain to hike for one day is the