Established in 1127 after a military collapse that precipitated the loss of its northern heartlands to the nomadic Jurchen people, the Southern Song Dynasty (南宋) was very much an empire on the defensive. This sense of being an island of civilization amid a rising tide of barbarism made it super sensitive to the achievements of Chinese culture, and even as it battled incursions on its borders, it took the glittering traditions of the Tang (唐) and Northern Song (北宋) dynasties and further refined them.
The Southern Song Dynasty, beleaguered militarily from without, and plagued by political dissension from within, produced artists who reached a pinnacle of creativity and technical skill that has, arguably, never been equaled.
The exhibition Dynastic Renaissance: Art and Culture of the Southern Song (文藝紹興 — 南宋藝術與文化特展), which opened last week in the main gallery of the National Palace Museum (國立故宮博物院), has brought together a staggering amount of material from this relatively short-lived dynasty (the Southern Song lasted 153 years before being overcome by the Mongols under Kublai Khan). To complement its own extensive holdings of Southern Song artifacts, the museum has arranged loans from 10 other institutions, including the Tokyo Museum and Kyoto National Museum in Japan, and the Shanghai Museum (上海博物館), Liaoning Provincial Museum (遼寧省博物院), Zhejiang Provincial Museum (浙江省博物館) and Fujian Museum (福建省博物院) in China. The exhibition comprises a total of 410 items spread over 10 galleries.
PHOTO COURTESY OF NPM
This is an important exhibition for anyone interested in Chinese culture, but perhaps more significantly still, it is very accessible for those without specialist knowledge. Credit must go to the curators who worked long and hard in the presentation and layout of the objects, and for the English language explanatory materials, which are more extensive and helpful than usual.
The most appealing aspect of the artifacts is the profound “humanism” that pervades Southern Song art. This is not a reference to the humanism of Enlightenment Europe, but more generally a sense of individuality and the importance of self-cultivation, aspects of Southern Song life that jive very closely with modern sensibilities.
A number of emperors during the Southern Song Dynasty were artists of the first rank, as in the case of Gao Zong (宋高宗), whose letter Imperial Order Presented to Yue Fei (賜岳飛手敕) is cherished not just as an important historical document, but for its outstanding penmanship, which combines a clear understanding of the finest calligraphic tradition with the charm of a unique personality. What’s more, one can even guess at the type of man Gao Zong might have been from the fine official portrait of the emperor that is included in the exhibition. He was one of the first Chinese emperors for whom we have trustworthy contemporary likenesses that go beyond merely ritual images of imperial dignity.
PHOTO COURTESY OF NPM
There are many other fine works of calligraphy on display, which apart from their artistic accomplishment, also provide an insight into the mixture of precariousness and self-belief that characterized the Southern Song.
Calligraphing Poetry (字書詩), written by the administrator and poet Lu You (陸游), is a calligraphic exercise of transcription that records ancient poems, which might otherwise have been lost.
Another interesting piece of calligraphy is the Letter to Shoichi Kokushi (無準師範與聖—國師尺牘), by the monk Wuzhen Shifan (無準師範), who expresses gratitude to Japanese Buddhist master Shoichi Kokushi for sending timber from Japan to assist in the reconstruction of the Jinshan Temple (徑山寺), which had been destroyed by fire. This work, on loan from the Tokyo National Museum and only on display until Nov. 23, is classified as a national treasure in Japan, and testifies to the important influence the Southern Song exerted even in the days before the dynasty’s final demise (the letter is dated 1242, 32 years before the dynasty fell).
Southern Song artists excelled in making guan (官), ceramic vessels decorated with the famous pale blue-green celadon glaze. The shape of many of these vessels imitates that of vessels traditionally made from bronze and used at formal state functions.
Impecunious and on the run from their aggressive northern neighbor, the Southern Song hadn’t the funds to create vastly expensive bronze ritual vessels, and passed the job of creating substitutes to highly talented master potters, who from unpromising materials sourced in the vicinity of the dynasty’s new capital at Lin-an (臨安), modern day Hangzhou (杭州), created a class of ceramic ware that is esteemed as some of the most beautiful ever made by mankind.
The ceramic vessels’ minimalist and impromptu beauty is immediately understandable in our contemporary setting — more so, indeed, than the bronze originals.
Another area where the Southern Song seem to be particularly modern is in the dynasty’s exploration of what might be variously described as a mannerist, decadent or minimalist style of visual expression. A particularly interesting explanatory diagram in the exhibition shows the shift from the central placement of the subject in a landscape painting in the Northern Song Dynasty, to asymmetrical compositions that increasingly emphasized either specific details or empty space as the Southern Song Dynasty progresses. Painters such as Li Song (李嵩) took this to extremes in paintings such as West Lake (西湖圖), in which the whole central area of the painting is left blank.
There are also many works that might almost be described as avant-garde in their forceful indifference to representational norms.
Immortal in Splashed Ink (潑墨仙人) by Liang Kai (梁楷) is informed by Zen Buddhist philosophy. Its boldly minimalist composition is expressive, especially when seen in the original, where every brush stoke is evidence of the artist’s physical engagement with the work.
There is much that is enormously spectacular in this show, but what is most surprising is the immediacy and power of the artifacts.
From its position of almost constant crisis, the Southern Song Dynasty created one of the most vibrant centuries in the development of Chinese art, and one that is particularly resonant today. While fighting for its life, the civilization discovered whole new forms of expression that continued to exert an influence on art in the succeeding centuries.
Above all, there is a transcendent sadness to the exhibition. Amid all this beauty, one thinks of the elusive lines from the late Tang Dynasty poet Li Shang-yin (李商隱), which, roughly translated, read: “The sunset is indescribably beautiful; alas, there follows the night” (夕陽無限好/只是近黃昏). For many of the Southern Song artists represented in this exhibition, the darkness of night was never far away.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,